Criminal Justice (1990) Timeline Explained – Every Event in Order

The defendant changed his strategy the moment he saw Denise Moore enter the courtroom. After catching sight of his accuser face-to-face, he urged his attorney David Ringel to negotiate a plea bargain to stop the proceedings. This sudden shift suggests he may have been facing the emotional weight of a live confrontation with the victim, or perhaps realized the trial would proceed regardless of his denials. The plea bargain offered a faster resolution with a known sentence rather than risking a potentially harsher outcome if convicted after a full trial.

Foreshadowing: The defendant had maintained his innocence throughout arraignment and refused earlier plea offers, making his sudden change in approach striking.

• plea bargain
• defendant
• courtroom
• Denise Moore
• trial

Despite concerns about her drug use and credibility, Denise Moore remained confident that the accused was her attacker. She had just been robbed and slashed in the vestibule moments after buying drugs, giving her a clear and recent opportunity to observe her attacker. The attack left her with a disfiguring slash across her face, a traumatic event that would create a strong, memorable impression. Even as the defense questioned her lifestyle and truthfulness about being in the building, she maintained certainty in her identification.

• Denise Moore
• identification
• witness
• lineup
• attack

At arraignment, the defendant's bail was set at an amount he could not pay, keeping him in custody throughout the pre-trial phase. This appears to be a strategic decision by the court, likely based on the severity of the charges (aggravated robbery and slashing), concerns about the defendant fleeing, and the nature of the crime itself. The high bail effectively ensured the defendant remained detained while the case progressed, limiting his ability to prepare a defense outside of jail and increasing pressure to accept a plea deal.

• bail
• arraignment
• custody
• defendant
• court

The film deliberately leaves the question of the defendant's guilt ambiguous. While Denise Moore identified him from a photo lineup and later in court, the prosecution's case rested entirely on her testimony, which was challenged due to her drug lifestyle and questions about why she was in the building. The defendant maintained his innocence throughout, and his public defender pushed to test the strength of the evidence at trial rather than accept a quick plea. The guilty plea at the end could reflect either actual guilt or a pragmatic decision to avoid the risk of a longer sentence if convicted.

• guilt
• defendant
• innocence
• evidence
• testimony

The defense consistently challenged Denise Moore's reliability as a witness because of her drug lifestyle. She had purchased drugs just before the attack, raising questions about her presence in the building and her ability to accurately perceive and recall events. The prosecution worried that the victim may not have been truthful about her reason for being in the vestibule. Her drug use created reasonable doubt about her perceptual clarity and credibility, making the case fundamentally dependent on whether the jury believed her identification despite these weaknesses.

• testimony
• credibility
• drug use
• witness
• defense

The ending left both parties feeling the resolution was unsatisfying. From Denise Moore's perspective, the 3½ to 7-year sentence may have felt inadequate given the permanent disfigurement she suffered and the violation she experienced. From the defendant's mother's viewpoint, her son had accepted a plea to crimes she believed he did not commit, and the system had failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The film uses this dual dissatisfaction to illustrate how a case built entirely on a single, contested identification leaves both sides feeling that true justice was not served.

• verdict
• sentence
• complainant
• mother
• justice

The District Attorney pursued the case aggressively despite knowing the weaknesses in the evidence. The victim's identification was the sole link connecting the defendant to the crime, and there were significant doubts about her credibility due to her drug use and questionable presence in the building. However, once the identification was made and the defendant was charged, the DA felt compelled to test the case in court rather than dismiss it entirely. This reflects how prosecutors sometimes proceed with marginal cases rather than admit they cannot prove guilt, particularly when a victim has identified a suspect.

• prosecution
• evidence
• DA
• case
• charges

The attack left Denise Moore with a deep, disfiguring slash across her face that scarred her permanently. Beyond the physical injury, the assault occurred immediately after she purchased drugs, placing her in a vulnerable and illegal situation that complicated her role as a credible witness. The trauma of being robbed and slashed, combined with the subsequent court process, created lasting emotional and psychological consequences that the film explores from her perspective.

• injury
• slash
• face
• victim
• trauma

The film probes whether the legal system itself becomes complicit in injustice. A case built entirely on a single, contested identification from a drug user led to a guilty plea and prison sentence, yet neither party felt justice was served. The defendant may have been innocent but accepted a plea to avoid worse consequences, while the victim received a modest sentence for a brutal attack. The narrative highlights how bail amounts, plea pressures, and reliance on imperfect witness testimony can produce outcomes that satisfy no one and may convict the wrong person.

• justice system
• wrongful conviction
• plea
• trial
• fairness

At arraignment, the defendant denied any wrongdoing and refused to accept any plea bargain offered by the prosecution. His public defender, David Ringel, insisted that the system must test the strength of the evidence rather than accept a quick deal. This stance reflected the defendant's claim of innocence and a belief that the case against him was weak. His position changed only after witnessing Denise Moore arrive in court, at which point he suddenly requested a plea negotiation.

• innocence
• plea bargain
• David Ringel
• arraignment
• defense