Two desperate, ambitious filmmakers stumble upon the perfect subject for their first big project: a 33-year-old cannibalistic serial killer, Anthony McAllister, Anthony Alviano who agrees to let them document every facet of his violent life. What starts as a dare or a chance to win credibility quickly spirals into a deeply unsettling portrait of a man who wears his gruesome acts as part of a broader philosophy.
At first, the filmmakers approach their subject with a mix of fear and curiosity. They begin to see Anthony not merely as a monster, but as a person with a stubbornly coherent worldview. He articulates his beliefs with a chilling calm, presenting ecological and philosophical justifications for his cannibalistic lifestyle. His explanations are persuasive enough to blur the lines between horror and rational argument, drawing the filmmakers into a troubling empathy as they listen, question, and slowly rethink what they thought they knew.
As the documentary rolls on, the tension intensifies. The filmmakers push back against Anthony’s shifting narratives and inconsistent past, challenging him on the contradictions that surface with every retelling. The dialogue grows sharper, the atmosphere grows tenser, and the lines between observer and observed begin to blur. Their questions threaten to expose more than they anticipated, and the power dynamics of the interview room tilt in unsettling ways as Anthony’s defenses and justifications falter under scrutiny.
In the midst of these confrontations, the crew conducts an awkward interview with Merle, Paul Fowles, the father of a young girl who was abducted and never found. Merle’s personal tragedy adds a haunting weight to the film, and his willingness to host and share his story offers a brief, human touch in a narrative otherwise saturated with menace. The scene is emotionally charged, giving even Anthony a rare glimpse of vulnerability and eliciting a reaction that hints at the humanity that lies beneath his chilling exterior.
As the documentary nears its end, the killer becomes acutely aware of how much of his life has been laid bare on camera. The process of revealing so much of himself begins to feel dangerous, and the atmosphere shifts from investigative curiosity to a charged, existential pressure. In the final interview, the tension erupts into a deadly confrontation, leaving behind a broken camera and the silenced remnants of the footage that once promised to tell a definitive story. The result is a haunting artifact that captures both the disturbing subject and the fragile line between truth and narrative.
