Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

The Best Man (1964) movie poster

Timeline

The Best Man (1964) Timeline Explained – Every Event in Order

Release, runtime and language
1964 · 102 mins · English
Directed by
Franklin J. Schaffner
Starring
Howard K. Smith, Kevin McCarthy, Henry Fonda, Mahalia Jackson, Gore Vidal, Gene Raymond

Amid a chaotic party convention, five candidates compete for the presidential nomination. With no clear majority after the first ballot, the leading contenders must weigh how far they’re willing to go to secure the nomination and ultimately the White House, exposing their ambitions and alliances.

On this page (5)
  1. 1 Events in order (12)
  2. 2 Timeline questions answered
  3. 3 Movie threads
  4. 4 Movies like The Best Man
  5. 5 Every angle

12 events in order · contains spoilers

The Best Man Timeline: Events in Chronological Order

Every key event of The Best Man (1964) in order, scene by scene, with when and where it takes place. Use it to untangle flashbacks, time jumps and parallel storylines, to refresh your memory before the sequel or to find the exact scene you are thinking of.

  1. Russell and Cantwell emerge as frontrunners

    In May 1964, former Secretary of State William Russell and Senator Joe Cantwell rise to the top of their party's presidential race. Both carry serious vulnerabilities: Russell's personal indiscretions and past nervous breakdown, Cantwell's ruthless, populist opportunism. The stage is set for a brutal contest at the convention.

    When
    May 1964
  2. Convention opens in Los Angeles

    At the nominating convention in Los Angeles, the campaigns jockey to win over undecided delegates while the aging former President Art Hockstader watches warily. He grapples with which candidate to back, warning of the risks in both approaches. In the end, he refuses to endorse either man, complicating both campaigns.

    When
    Nomination convention, May 1964
    Where
    Los Angeles
  3. Cantwell uses illegal psychological reports against Russell

    Cantwell attacks Russell using illegally obtained psychological reports, hoping to smear his opponent's character. He assumes Hockstader will endorse him, but the former president declares his neutrality and refuses to be a tool for either side. The exchange hardens the contest into a test of nerve and principle.

    When
    During private talks at the convention
    Where
    Convention suite
  4. Undecided delegates become battleground

    Undecided delegates become the campaign's focal point as balloting begins. Russell appeals to delegates' principles and integrity, while Cantwell relies on blackmail and fear to gain influence. The fighting continues with no clear winner in sight.

    When
    First ballot phase
    Where
    Convention floor, Los Angeles
  5. Hockstader offers VP slots to minor candidates

    Art Hockstader informs the campaign teams that he would consider multiple paths, including offering the vice-presidential spots to the three minor candidates: Oscar Anderson, John Merwin, and T. T. Claypoole. Russell's aides learn of the backroom maneuvering, highlighting the extent of backstage deals at the convention. The offers illustrate how the race blends ideology with pragmatic power plays.

    When
    During the convention
    Where
    Convention floor, Los Angeles
  6. Bascomb surfaces as a potential smear

    One of Russell's aides discovers Sheldon Bascomb, who could link Cantwell to homosexual activity during his World War II service in Alaska. The allegation creates a looming threat that could derail Cantwell’s momentum. Cantwell's team counters, while Russell weighs how and when to use the information.

    When
    Conventional proceedings, early ballots
    Where
    Campaign offices
  7. First ballot ends in deadlock

    After the first ballot, neither candidate has enough votes to win, though Cantwell holds a slim lead. The deadlock exposes the campaign's divide between a hard-edged strategy and a principled stance. The convention descends into a tense stalemate as rounds continue.

    When
    First ballot
    Where
    Los Angeles Convention Center
  8. Private meeting; confrontation over the smear

    Russell arranges a private meeting with Cantwell to address the charges, while Bascomb confronts Cantwell face-to-face about the allegations. Cantwell counters that Russell will not pull the trigger and taunts him for avoiding a fight. Russell warns Cantwell that he could release the charge if Cantwell blunders, signaling a brutal back-and-forth.

    When
    Between ballots
    Where
    Private meeting room, convention
  9. Cantwell's momentum persists amid ongoing balloting

    As more ballots are cast, Cantwell maintains a slender lead and the momentum seems to favor him. Russell's anti-corruption appeal still resonates with some delegates, but Cantwell's relentless tactics keep him ahead. The race tightens into a tense standoff on the floor.

    When
    Mid-balloting rounds
    Where
    Convention floor, Los Angeles
  10. Russell rejects Cantwell's VP offer; backs Merwin

    Cantwell privately offers Russell the second spot on his ticket, but Russell shocks him by releasing his delegates and urging support for Merwin instead. The move repudiates Cantwell's backroom bargain and triggers a dramatic realignment. Merwin rises as a leading contender as delegates swing behind him.

    When
    Late-stage balloting
    Where
    Convention floor
  11. Merwin secures the nomination

    With Russell's delegates backing Merwin, the former governor secures the party's nomination. Cantwell watches in frustration as his strategy to derail the process falters. Hockstader maintains neutrality, neither endorsing the nominee nor throwing his support behind Cantwell.

    When
    Nomination decision
    Where
    Los Angeles
  12. Final stage: VP slots and the aftermath

    The party acknowledges the three minor candidates—Anderson, Merwin, and Claypoole—and cites the VP slot offers that shaped the race. The film closes by underscoring the cost of ambition and the fragility of principle in modern political campaigning. The outcome of the race remains uncertain, shaped by loyalties and backroom compromises.

    When
    Post-nomination
    Where
    Convention site

Last updated: October 09, 2025 at 09:20

Was this helpful?

Timeline questions answered

The Best Man Timeline Explained: Your Questions Answered

When does it happen, and why in that order? The questions people ask about the chronology of The Best Man (1964): time jumps, flashbacks, cause and effect between scenes and the correct order of events, each answered with spoilers.

Q1

Why does William Russell refuse to use the smear campaign against Cantwell?

Russell is portrayed as a principled intellectual who refuses to compromise his moral integrity. When his aides suggest using the Sheldon Bascomb allegations about Cantwell's past, Russell resists the temptation, recognizing that engaging in such tactics would make him indistinguishable from his opponent. This principled stance ultimately costs him the nomination but preserves his character.

Foreshadowing: Earlier scenes establish Russell as a man of strict principles, contrasting sharply with Cantwell's ruthless approach.

  • william russell
  • smear campaign
  • bascomb
  • political ethics
  • integrity
Q2

Why does former President Hockstader refuse to endorse either candidate?

Hockstader is wary of both candidates: he recognizes Russell's indecision and rigid principled stance as potential weaknesses for a president, while Cantwell's hard-edged ruthlessness troubles him despite its effectiveness. He refuses to become a tool for either side and maintains neutrality, even as the race becomes increasingly contentious.

Foreshadowing: Hockstader's warning about the risks of both approaches hints at his ultimate refusal to commit.

  • art hockstader
  • endorsement
  • convention
  • party politics
Q3

Why does Joe Cantwell use illegal psychological reports against Russell?

Cantwell relies on aggressive, any-means-necessary tactics to secure the nomination. He orders his brother and campaign manager Don Cantwell to obtain and use illegally acquired psychological reports about Russell's past nervous breakdown, hoping to destroy Russell's credibility and character in the eyes of delegates.

Foreshadowing: Cantwell's reputation as a ruthless populist who promises to win by any means necessary establishes his willingness to use dirty tricks.

  • joe cantwell
  • psychological reports
  • russell
  • blackmail
  • illegal tactics
Q4

Why does Russell reject Cantwell's VP offer and endorse Merwin instead?

Russell refuses to join Cantwell's ticket because he finds Cantwell's smear tactics and backroom bargaining unacceptable. Rather than accept the vice-presidential spot as a compromise, Russell releases his delegates and urges them to support Governor John Merwin, blocking Cantwell's path to victory and ensuring a more principled candidate advances.

Foreshadowing: Russell has consistently refused to engage in dirty politics throughout the film, making this rejection consistent with his character.

  • russell
  • cantwell
  • merwin
  • vp offer
  • nomination
  • delegates
Q5

What is the missile gap referenced in the film?

The missile gap was a perceived discrepancy in nuclear missile capabilities between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Cantwell uses this as a central campaign issue, promising to close the gap and win the presidency by projecting strength, appealing to voters' national security fears.

Foreshadowing: Cantwell's populist anti-communist platform emphasizes military strength and toughness as essential qualities for leadership.

  • missile gap
  • cold war
  • cantwell
  • national security
  • campaign issue
Q6

What would the Sheldon Bascomb allegations have revealed about Cantwell?

Sheldon Bascomb could potentially link Cantwell to homosexual activity during his World War II service in Alaska. This information represented a devastating smear weapon that Russell's team could have used to derail Cantwell's campaign, but Russell ultimately refused to deploy it.

Foreshadowing: Cantwell's rivals push Bascomb to testify, creating a looming threat that could have derailed Cantwell's momentum.

  • sheldon bascomb
  • cantwell
  • allegations
  • smear
  • homosexuality
  • wwii
Q7

Why is Russell's past nervous breakdown significant to voters?

Russell carries the shadow of a prior nervous breakdown, which Cantwell exploits using illegal psychological reports. This vulnerability challenges Russell's image as a steady, capable leader and provides Cantwell with ammunition to question Russell's fitness to handle the pressures of the presidency.

Foreshadowing: Russell is described as having a nervous breakdown that lingers over his public bearing from the film's opening.

  • russell
  • nervous breakdown
  • psychological reports
  • fitness to lead
  • cantwell attack
Q8

How does John Merwin secure the presidential nomination?

Merwin wins when Russell releases his delegates and explicitly endorses him instead of accepting Cantwell's VP offer. This dramatic realignment causes delegates to swing behind Merwin, propelling the dark horse candidate to victory. The move represents Russell's final strategic play to block Cantwell rather than pursue personal advancement.

Foreshadowing: Hockstader had offered VP slots to the three minor candidates, including Merwin, hinting at their potential viability.

  • john merwin
  • nomination
  • delegates
  • russell endorsement
  • dark horse
Q9

Why does the convention remain deadlocked through multiple ballots?

Neither Russell nor Cantwell can secure a majority of delegates despite several ballots. Russell's principled appeal resonates with some delegates, while Cantwell's relentless tactics and blackmail maintain his slender lead. The deadlock exposes the fundamental divide between the two candidates' approaches to politics.

Foreshadowing: The first ballot shows neither candidate with enough votes, establishing the stalemate that drives the film's tension.

  • convention
  • deadlock
  • ballots
  • delegates
  • russell
  • cantwell
Q10

What makes Russell and Cantwell such bitter rivals?

Russell and Cantwell represent opposing philosophies: Russell is a principled intellectual who resists dirty tactics, while Cantwell is a ruthless populist willing to use blackmail and fear. Neither trusts the other, and both question the other's fitness to lead. Their rivalry defines the entire race, with each man's character and methods constantly tested against the other's.

Foreshadowing: From the opening, both men emerge as frontrunners with serious vulnerabilities that make them vulnerable to each other's attacks.

  • russell
  • cantwell
  • rivalry
  • philosophy
  • politics
  • nomination

Movie threads

More Movies Like The Best Man, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes The Best Man tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Procedural Political Dramas with High-Stakes Betrayal like The Best Man

Stories of power struggles and moral compromises within tense political systems. If you liked the tense convention politics and moral quandaries in The Best Man, explore more movies like it. This list features similar political dramas and riveting stories about power struggles, backroom deals, and the personal costs of ambition in high-stakes settings.

  • tense
  • strategic
  • cynical
  • observational
  • morally conflicted
  • anxious
  • Tone: tense, cynical, observational
  • Pacing: steady, procedural
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative follows a procedural, often step-by-step unfolding of a political contest or institutional crisis. Tension builds not from action, but from strategic revelations, ethical dilemmas, and the suspense of who will outmaneuver whom. Character arcs typically involve a confrontation between idealism and the pragmatic, often corrupting, demands of power.

Why they belong together: Movies are grouped here by their shared focus on the 'how' of power—the processes, negotiations, and betrayals. They create a specific kind of intellectual and ethical tension, appealing to viewers who enjoy observing complex strategies and the moral decay that can accompany the pursuit of influence.

Movies with Bittersweet Endings After a Costly Moral Victory like The Best Man

Characters preserve their integrity but sacrifice their ambitions, leading to a pragmatic resolution. Find films with endings similar to The Best Man, where characters choose integrity over ambition. If you liked the bittersweet conclusion, these movies explore similar themes of moral compromise and pyrrhic victories, featuring stories where doing the right thing leads to a satisfying yet poignant resolution.

  • bittersweet
  • morally conflicted
  • poignant
  • thought-provoking
  • cynical
  • idealistic
  • Tone: bittersweet, morally conflicted
  • Pacing: steady, character-driven
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The central conflict forces the main character to choose between achieving a deeply desired goal through unethical means or maintaining their principles at the expense of success. The narrative arc culminates in this choice, resulting in an ending that feels simultaneously righteous and disappointing—a personal win but a pragmatic, sometimes unsatisfying, real-world result.

Why they belong together: These films are connected by a specific emotional and thematic payoff. They explore the complex price of integrity and deliver an ending that is emotionally resonant precisely because it is not a simple, happy conclusion. They appeal to viewers who appreciate nuanced resolutions that reflect real-world compromises.

If you liked this

Movies Like The Best Man

Similar movies to The Best Man: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

The Best Man (1964) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about The Best Man in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app