Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

Icarus (2017) movie poster

Plot Summary

Icarus (2017) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2017 · 121 min · English
Echo score 62

A compelling sports-thriller-documentary hybrid unfolds as a small town's pursuit of wind power energy reveals a tangled network of personal connections. The story explores the ambitions of a driven politician, the potential of a young intern, a farmer determined to protect her land, her son searching for his identity, and a construction manager hoping for a fresh start. Their lives become intertwined, exposing the complexities and consequences of progress.

On this page (6)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Movies like Icarus
  6. 6 Every angle

Where to watch

Where to Watch Icarus (2017)

Where can you watch Icarus? Stream, rent or buy it in the US, including on Hoopla, Fandango at Home Free and Tubi TV: current JustWatch availability with up-to-date prices.

Streaming availability powered by JustWatch

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in Icarus: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of Icarus (2017) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

Lance Armstrong, celebrated for clinching the Tour de France title seven times, seemed invincible as he never failed a doping test—despite being subjected to over 500 examinations. It wasn't until his teammates turned whistleblowers that the truth surfaced, highlighting the glaring flaws within the anti-doping system. As Don Catlin, the head of the drug testing labs, asserts, "all athletes take drugs, and with the right knowledge, one can consistently bypass the tests."

In 2014, amateur cyclist Bryan Fogel embarked on a grueling challenge at the Haute Route, a grueling seven-day, 1000-mile cycling race. Despite competing clean, he found himself exhausted and ranked 14th. In an audacious attempt to expose the vulnerability of drug testing, he approached Catlin to devise a personalized doping strategy, intended to enable him to outsmart any tests and claim victory. Yet, as Catlin reconsidered his involvement fearing for his reputation, he directed Bryan towards Grigory Rodchenkov, the director of Russia's national anti-doping lab.

Embarking on an investigation into the hidden realm of sports doping, Bryan quickly befriended Rodchenkov, who divulged the means to take banned substances clandestinely, allowing Bryan to showcase the inadequacies in current testing methods. With instant improvements in his performance, Fogel was instructed by Rodchenkov to freeze his urine at calculated intervals and was led to understand the sophisticated doping strategies employed by Armstrong.

As Bryan trained, his bond with Grigory deepened, resulting in shocking revelations about a state-sponsored doping initiative from Russia. Following international media scrutiny regarding the allegations, when WADA's president, Craig Reedie, felt compelled to act, their investigation led to the commission being established. Even as investigations circled Grigory, he remained an integral part of Bryan's doping regimen.

In May 2015, Grigory visited the U.S. to retrieve urine samples from Bryan, unveiling his history with Catlin and the elaborate training he underwent in the American anti-doping system. As Bryan prepared for the Haute Route just weeks away, Grigory's guidance on when to administer his final doses proved vital. Although Bryan managed a commendable 11th position in the initial stage of the race, equipment failures sent him spiraling down the ranks, ultimately finishing 27th.

By November 2015, a commission report confirmed widespread corruption and systematic doping practices in Russia, resulting in Grigory facing dismissal from his position. As pressures mounted, he warned Bryan about potential danger from Russian authorities. Amid escalating tensions, Grigory's plea for escape intensified when subsequent natural threats emerged, culminating in Bryan arranging for his safe arrival in the U.S.

Once safely in Los Angeles, their collaboration with the U.S. Department of Justice, alongside the New York Times, exposed decades of Olympic fraud by the Russian state, alleging that a startling number of medals won were tainted by their doping strategies. Grigory detailed the intricacies of the doping programs, revealing historical connections to former programs that had exploited athletes while maintaining an image of integrity.

As the 2016 Olympics loomed, Grigory's precarious situation escalated, highlighted by the mysterious death of a colleague and threats looming overhead. In a dramatic turn, he opted to go public, divulging details before being summoned to testify before a grand jury. His revelations regarding the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics, including scandalous state-sanctioned doping operations, further unveiled the depth of the Olympic fraud.

Thanks to extensive evidence provided by Grigory—including spreadsheets and emails—WADA was forced to take action, resulting in an unprecedented ban on the entire Russian Track and Field team from participating in the Olympic games. The world watched as Grigory entered protective custody, stricken by the realization that Russia’s denial of culpability persisted, despite overwhelming evidence. The film concludes with the stark reminder of Grigory's ongoing plight while the Russian athletics team prepares for the 2018 events amidst continued global scrutiny.

Last updated: November 08, 2024 at 00:42

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

Icarus Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about Icarus (2017): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why did Bryan Fogel decide to take performance-enhancing drugs?

Bryan Fogel decided to dope himself as an experiment to expose vulnerabilities in anti-doping testing. After finishing 14th in the Haute Route race while competing clean, he wanted to prove that with the right knowledge and guidance, athletes could consistently bypass drug tests. He collaborated with Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov to develop a personalized doping regimen that would allow him to pass any examination.

Foreshadowing: Earlier in the film, Don Catlin states that all athletes take drugs and that testing can be beaten with the right knowledge.

  • bryan fogel
  • doping
  • haute route
  • experiment
  • anti-doping testing
Q2

How did Grigory Rodchenkov become a whistleblower?

Grigory Rodchenkov was the director of Russia's national anti-doping laboratory. After the November 2015 commission report confirmed widespread corruption in Russian doping, he faced dismissal and threats from Russian authorities. When Bryan Fogel arranged for his escape to the United States, Rodchenkov chose to cooperate with the U.S. Department of Justice and go public with evidence of the state-sponsored doping program.

Foreshadowing: Early in their collaboration, Grigory warned Bryan about potential danger from Russian authorities as investigations circled closer.

  • grigory rodchenkov
  • whistleblower
  • russia
  • threats
  • escape
Q3

What was Russia's state-sponsored doping program?

Russia's state-sponsored doping program was a systematic operation where the Russian government, through its anti-doping laboratory, helped athletes use banned substances while evading detection. Grigory Rodchenkov revealed that thousands of Russian athletes across multiple Olympic cycles were involved, with the program designed to win medals and national glory. The program included swapping dirty urine samples with clean ones at the Sochi Winter Olympics.

  • russia
  • state-sponsored doping
  • sochi olympics
  • whistleblower
  • athletes
Q4

How did the Icarus documentary expose Russian doping?

The documentary exposed Russian doping through a two-pronged approach: Bryan's personal doping experiment demonstrated how easily tests could be circumvented, while Grigory provided internal evidence including spreadsheets and emails detailing the Russian program. This evidence forced WADA to launch investigations that confirmed systematic doping, leading to unprecedented sanctions against Russia.

  • documentary
  • expose
  • wada
  • evidence
  • investigation
Q5

What happened to Grigory Rodchenkov after going public?

After Grigory Rodchenkov went public with evidence of Russian doping, he was placed in protective custody in the United States due to credible threats against his life. He testified before a grand jury and his revelations led to the ban of the Russian Track and Field team from the Olympics. Despite overwhelming evidence, Russia continued to deny culpability, and Grigory remained in hiding as his life was permanently altered.

  • grigory rodchenkov
  • protective custody
  • testify
  • life in danger
Q6

Why was the Russian track and field team banned from the Olympics?

The Russian track and field team was banned from the Olympics because Grigory Rodchenkov provided extensive evidence, including spreadsheets, emails, and detailed testimony, revealing a systematic, state-sponsored doping program. WADA used this evidence to investigate and confirm widespread corruption, resulting in an unprecedented ban on the entire Russian Track and Field team from competing in the Olympic games.

  • russian track and field
  • ban
  • olympics
  • wada
  • sanctions
Q7

How is Lance Armstrong connected to the Icarus documentary?

Lance Armstrong serves as the film's starting point and context for the doping investigation. His case, winning seven Tour de France titles while passing over 500 doping tests, demonstrated the flaws in the anti-doping system. When Armstrong's teammates became whistleblowers, it revealed how even the most celebrated athletes could dope undetected, which inspired Bryan Fogel's own experiment.

  • lance armstrong
  • tour de france
  • whistleblowers
  • anti-doping system
Q8

What evidence did Grigory Rodchenkov provide to WADA?

Grigory Rodchenkov provided WADA with concrete evidence including detailed spreadsheets documenting athletes' doping schedules, emails revealing the coordination of the state program, and firsthand testimony about how the doping operation functioned. He also explained the specific methods used to swap urine samples at the Sochi Winter Olympics, providing a detailed roadmap of the fraudulent operations.

  • evidence
  • spreadsheets
  • emails
  • wada
  • sochi winter olympics
Q9

How did the doping scandal affect the 2016 Rio Olympics?

The revelations from Grigory Rodchenkov and the subsequent WADA investigation led to the ban of the Russian Track and Field team from the 2016 Rio Olympics. While some Russian athletes were allowed to compete under a neutral flag after proving they were clean, the scandal created intense scrutiny and controversy around the integrity of the games, with the broader Russian Olympic team also facing restrictions.

  • 2016 rio olympics
  • russia ban
  • neutral flag
  • athletics
Q10

Why was Grigory Rodchenkov in danger after the documentary?

Grigory Rodchenkov faced danger because he exposed a state-sponsored program backed by the Russian government. After the November 2015 commission report confirmed Russian doping corruption, he was dismissed from his position and warned Bryan about active threats. The mysterious death of a colleague further highlighted the risks he faced. His decision to go public placed him in direct conflict with powerful interests willing to use extreme measures to maintain secrecy.

  • danger
  • threats
  • russian government
  • whistleblower safety
  • mysterious death

Movie threads

More Movies Like Icarus, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes Icarus tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Thrilling Documentary Investigations like Icarus

Real-world investigations unfold with the tension and pacing of a heart-pounding thriller. If you enjoyed the high-stakes tension of Icarus, explore more movies like it that blend documentary authenticity with thriller pacing. These films feature real-world investigations, dangerous exposés, and the urgent race to reveal the truth, creating a similarly suspenseful and impactful viewing experience.

  • suspenseful
  • investigative
  • urgent
  • dangerous
  • exposing
  • paranoid
  • Tone: tense, urgent, exposing
  • Pacing: fast, driven by revelations
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative typically follows a linear but escalating investigative path. A protagonist, often an outsider or insider turned whistleblower, begins questioning a system. As they dig deeper, they uncover a complex conspiracy, facing increasing threats and moral dilemmas, culminating in a public revelation that carries significant personal and societal costs.

Why they belong together: Movies in this thread are grouped by their unique hybrid nature—they are rooted in factual storytelling but are crafted to deliver the suspense, pacing, and emotional intensity of a classic thriller. They share a common feeling of urgent, dangerous discovery.

Bittersweet Whistleblower Dramas like Icarus

Stories of profound personal sacrifice for a truth that brings a pyrrhic victory. For viewers who appreciated the emotional weight and bittersweet ending of Icarus, this section features similar movies about whistleblowers. These stories explore the profound personal sacrifice involved in exposing corruption, leading to victories that are morally necessary yet devastatingly costly for the individuals involved.

  • somber
  • tense
  • moral conflict
  • sacrifice
  • isolated
  • pyrrhic victory
  • Tone: tense, somber, bittersweet
  • Pacing: steady, character-driven
Why these movies?

The story pattern: A central character, initially embedded within a system, discovers a grave injustice or crime. Their moral awakening leads them to become a source, but the act of whistleblowing irrevocably destroys their former life, safety, and relationships. The story ends with the truth exposed, but the protagonist is left isolated, bearing the heavy scars of their choice.

Why they belong together: These films are connected by their core thematic focus on the paradox of whistleblowing: a necessary act for the greater good that results in profound personal ruin. They share a heavy emotional weight, a tense atmosphere of betrayal, and a conclusively bittersweet or bleak ending feel.

If you liked this

Movies Like Icarus

Similar movies to Icarus: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

Icarus (2017) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about Icarus in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app