Shotyi Bole Shotyi Kichhu Nei

A High Court judge at the center of a high-profile murder case, he is haunted by duty, memory, and the nagging question of whether verdicts can ever be purely objective. The party and subsequent dream jury reveal his vulnerability and the weight of responsibility in shaping justice. His introspection drives the tension between law, morality, and personal bias.

A flamboyant fashion designer who acts as a provocateur and moral compass within Brajeswar's subconscious. He challenges homogeneity and invites radical perspectives on guilt, innocence, and societal norms. Satya’s presence reframes the deliberations, forcing the group to confront hidden prejudices and the fragility of truth.

The accused in the central case, a young Muslim boy whose act becomes a touchstone for discussions of communalism and justice. Within the dream jury, Noor's portrayal triggers debates about motive, prejudice, and the societal forces that shape perceptions of guilt. His role embodies the collateral impact of a high-stakes verdict on a marginalized young man.

A guest representing urban elitism and the social cocktail of privilege, Taposh embodies the class dynamics at play during the party. His presence highlights how affluence and social networks influence discussions of morality and justice in the dreamscape. He pushes the group to consider exterior judgments as part of the Verdict process.

A guest whose pragmatic and skeptical outlook mirrors contemporary urban doubt about the legal system. Sumit represents the intellect side of deliberations, challenging assumptions and demanding rigor in the questionable nature of truth. His contributions underscore the film's theme that justice is not simply binary but a spectrum of perspectives.

A guest whose perspective foregrounds gender and class intersections within the jury's deliberations. Arundhati's presence reveals how social identities influence interpretations of motive, evidence, and guilt. Her contributions stress the need to acknowledge structural inequalities in the pursuit of a fair verdict.

A guest who embodies a female viewpoint within the social ensemble, offering insight into how women experience justice and judgment in a culturally charged context. Roopa's input sharpens the debate on bias and responsibility in the courtroom-turned-dreamscape.

A guest who represents wealth and corporate influence within the jury's circle. His attitudes illuminate how money and power can sway perceptions of morality and legal outcomes in modern society. Gaurang's presence adds a layer of economic critique to the deliberations.