Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

The Interview (1998) movie poster

Plot Summary

The Interview (1998) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
1998 · 104 mins · English
Loading streaming availability…
Directed by
Craig Monahan
Starring
Hugo Weaving, Michael Caton, Aaron Jeffery, Tony Martin, Peter McCauley, Robert Davis

Two minds… one truth A duel between a suspected murderer and a detective pressed by people who want results. But whose skin is really wanted?

On this page (6)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Movies like The Interview
  6. 6 Every angle
Loading streaming availability…

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in The Interview: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of The Interview (1998) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

Edward Rodney Fleming is a man living alone after losing his job and his wife. One morning, John Steele, a Detective Sergeant, and his subordinate, Wayne Prior, break into Fleming's apartment. They rough him up, ransack his belongings, and haul him away to the police station in handcuffs.

At the station, Steele and Prior question Fleming in an interrogation room. The police claim a witness saw Fleming with Beecroft, the owner of a stolen car, and they argue that Fleming’s handwriting matches forged sales correspondence between Beecroft and a fake buyer — a buyer whose alias matches one Fleming used as a teenager to steal a car for a joyride. Fleming denies any knowledge of the theft and, in the meantime, simply asks for food, having not eaten since the previous day. Steele feigns empathy while Prior intensifies the pressure when the room’s recorder is off.

In the midst of questioning, Det. Insp. Jackson orders Steele to handle an intrusive reporter named Barry Walls. Steele complains about Walls’ reckless reporting, and Walls reveals he overheard Prior questioning Steele behind his back, suggesting he can be useful if provided with information. Steele privately confronts Prior, pins him to the wall, and warns him against future disloyalty.

As the interrogation continues, Steele reveals Fleming that the car’s owner is missing — a clue Fleming quickly reads as evidence that he is being suspected of murder and tied to other missing persons cases in the news. Fleming asks for a lawyer. His attorney advises him to stay silent until he is released, but Steele persuades Jackson to grant more time with Fleming.

Fleming’s confidence grows. Despite the lawyer’s advice, he asserts that the missing persons were murdered and mocks the police for chasing a vague motive. He hints that he might share more after he has eaten. When Steele finally brings food, Fleming recounts how Beecroft picked him up while he was hitchhiking, and how he killed Beecroft on a whim. He then stole Beecroft’s car and wallet, disposing of the body. He casually admits to killing five or six other victims over the years, claiming he cannot remember all the details, but consistently “beat them to death after hitchhiking with them.” Fleming agrees to provide a video-recorded confession as well.

However, during the videotaping, Jackson interrupts to speak with Fleming. Fleming immediately retracts everything, saying he only told Steele and Prior what they wanted to hear because they brutalized him, threatened him, and refused to feed him. Jackson forces Steele and Prior to end the questioning.

Later, Steele learns that the entire day’s interrogation was filmed without his knowledge, due to an ethics investigation into his conduct. The officer in charge, Det. Hudson, determines that Steele’s interview is inadmissible in court because of coercive tactics, misdirection, and other questionable methods. Steele blames Jackson for ruining the interview and not standing up for him, while Jackson offers to testify that Steele tried to rein in Prior’s aggression. Believing Fleming’s guilt and furious that he might walk free, Steele secretly passes the case materials and the audio recording of the confession to Walls, even at the risk of consequences for himself.

In a final interview, Det. Hudson confronts Steele, who accuses the ethics investigator of having a personal grudge. Hudson shuts off the recorder, insults Steele, and warns him that he will be fired. Unknown to Hudson, Steele has another recorder running, capturing Hudson’s abusive outburst. The scene ends with Steele planning how to use that recording to defend himself.

Fleming leaves the station with an ambiguous, unsettling grin. In the film’s closing moments, he is shown hitchhiking again, the viewer left to wonder about his true guilt or innocence. The story casts a cold light on who is tested, who tells the truth, and how power and fear can distort the line between justice and entrapment.

Last updated: October 09, 2025 at 09:18

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

The Interview Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about The Interview (1998): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why did Fleming suddenly confess to killing Beecroft and other hitchhikers?

Fleming confessed after receiving food from Steele, breaking his previous silence. He explained that he killed Beecroft on a whim after being picked up while hitchhiking, stole his car and wallet, and disposed of the body. He casually admitted to five or six other killings, claiming he couldn't remember all the details. However, he later recanted, stating he only told Steele and Prior what they wanted to hear because they brutalized, starved, and threatened him.

Foreshadowing: Earlier in the interrogation, Fleming hints he might share more after eating, foreshadowing his decision to confess.

  • confession
  • serial killer
  • hitchhiking
  • interrogation coercion
  • edward fleming
Q2

Why did Fleming take back his confession during the video recording?

When Jackson interrupted the videotaped session, Fleming immediately retracted everything. He explained that he only told Steele and Prior what they wanted to hear because they had brutalized him, threatened him, and refused to feed him until he complied. This recantation shifted the entire case direction, as his detailed confession was no longer usable as evidence.

Foreshadowing: The shift occurs right when Jackson enters, suggesting Fleming was waiting for an authority figure to give him an out.

  • recantation
  • confession
  • coerced statement
  • jackson
  • interrogation room
Q3

Why was Fleming's confession thrown out as inadmissible?

Detective Hudson determined that the interrogation was inadmissible in court due to coercive tactics, misdirection, and other questionable methods used by Steele and Prior. An ethics investigation had been secretly filming the entire day's proceedings, and Hudson concluded that the detectives' conduct violated proper procedure. This meant the confession couldn't be used against Fleming legally.

Foreshadowing: The early scene establishes the coercive atmosphere with the rough breakup, ransacking of belongings, and deprivation of food.

  • ethics investigation
  • inadmissible evidence
  • detective hudson
  • coercive tactics
  • police misconduct
Q4

Why did Detective Steele give the case file and confession recording to journalist Barry Walls?

Despite knowing the confession was inadmissible and that he would likely be fired, Steele still believed firmly in Fleming's guilt. He passed the case materials and audio recording to Walls because he didn't care about the consequences for himself, he wanted to ensure Fleming would face public scrutiny and potential justice through the press rather than through the corrupted legal system.

Foreshadowing: Steele's earlier complaint about Walls' reckless reporting hints at his complex relationship with media manipulation.

  • steele
  • barry walls
  • leak
  • reporter
  • case file
  • whistleblowing
Q5

What does the ending imply when Fleming starts hitchhiking again?

The closing shot shows Fleming leaving the police station with an unsettling grin and resuming his hitchhiking, the same method he used to lure his alleged victims. This ambiguous ending deliberately leaves his true guilt or innocence unresolved. It suggests either his continued danger to society if guilty, or his successful manipulation of the entire justice system if innocent. The image轮回 a cold, cynical view of whether true justice was ever served.

Foreshadowing: Fleming's confession described how he met victims through hitchhiking, making the final image particularly ominous.

  • ending
  • ambiguous
  • hitchhiking
  • guilt
  • fleming
  • serial killer
Q6

Why did police target Fleming for the stolen car and potential murders?

Police claimed a witness saw Fleming with Beecroft, the owner of a stolen car. They also argued that Fleming's handwriting matched forged sales correspondence between Beecroft and a fake buyer, an alias Fleming had used as a teenager to steal a car for a joyride. When told the car owner was missing, Fleming correctly inferred he was suspected of murder connected to other disappearances in the news.

Foreshadowing: The forged correspondence uses an alias from Fleming's past, creating the circumstantial link.

  • arrest
  • evidence
  • handwriting
  • beecroft
  • stolen car
  • alias
Q7

Why did Steele secretly record his conversation with Detective Hudson?

Steele intentionally ran a second recorder during his interview with Hudson, capturing the supervisor's abusive outburst after Hudson turned off the official recorder. When Hudson insulted Steele and threatened to fire him, Steele was secretly documenting everything. This recording became his ammunition to defend himself against the ethics findings and potentially expose Hudson's misconduct.

Foreshadowing: The earlier scene where Steele complains about Walls' reporting hints at his willingness to use media and recordings strategically.

  • recording
  • steele
  • hudson
  • ethics
  • evidence
  • self-defense
Q8

What is Barry Walls' role in the investigation and Steele's plan?

Barry Walls is an intrusive reporter who approaches Steele seeking information. He reveals he overheard Prior questioning Steele behind his back and offers to be useful in exchange for information. Steele initially resents Walls' recklessness but later secretly gives him the case file and confession recording, using the reporter as a conduit to expose Fleming publicly despite the legal case collapsing.

Foreshadowing: Walls' earlier offer to be useful if provided with information sets up his later role in Steele's scheme.

  • barry walls
  • reporter
  • media
  • leak
  • investigation
Q9

Why did Fleming ask for a lawyer mid-interrogation, then continue talking?

After realizing he was suspected of murder connected to missing persons cases, Fleming asked for a lawyer. His attorney advised him to stay silent until released. However, Steele persuaded Jackson to grant more time, and Fleming's confidence grew. Despite the lawyer's advice, he chose to continue engaging with Steele, eventually confessing and then recanting, a strategy that protected him legally while confounding the investigation.

Foreshadowing: Fleming's quick deduction that he was suspected of murder shows his intelligence and strategic thinking.

  • lawyer
  • rights
  • interrogation
  • strategy
  • confession
Q10

Why did Steele confront Prior about disloyalty during the interrogation?

After Jackson mentioned that Walls overheard Prior questioning Steele behind his back, Steele privately confronted Prior, pinning him to the wall and warning him against future disloyalty. This internal tension revealed the toxic dynamic between the detectives and heightened the atmosphere of mistrust within the investigation, foreshadowing how personal conflicts would ultimately undermine the case.

Foreshadowing: This confrontation establishes the power struggle that runs beneath the interrogation's surface.

  • steele
  • prior
  • loyalty
  • confrontation
  • internal conflict

Movie threads

More Movies Like The Interview, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes The Interview tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Claustrophobic psychological duels like in The Interview

Two characters locked in a high-stakes battle of wits and wills. If you liked the tense, confined battle of wits in The Interview, explore movies like it. These films focus on high-stakes psychological confrontations, often set in single locations, where the truth is elusive and the power dynamic constantly shifts.

  • claustrophobic
  • psychological
  • tense
  • unsettling
  • mind games
  • oppressive
  • Tone: tense, unsettling, cynical
  • Pacing: steady, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Narratives in this thread revolve around a direct, intellectual confrontation. The plot is driven by dialogue, revelation, and psychological manipulation rather than physical action. The story unfolds in a tight space, creating a pressure cooker atmosphere where one character's gain is the other's loss.

Why they belong together: Movies are grouped here for their shared focus on a contained, cerebral conflict. They deliver a similar experience of high tension, moral ambiguity, and a feeling of being trapped in a room with two minds warring for dominance.

Bleak justice system thrillers similar to The Interview

Grim crime stories where the system is as corrupt as the crime. For viewers who appreciated The Interview's grim portrayal of a corrupt justice system. These movies explore similar themes of police brutality, psychological manipulation, and the ambiguous line between detective and criminal in dark, suspenseful crime stories.

  • grim
  • cynical
  • unsettling
  • corruption
  • police brutality
  • moral ambiguity
  • Tone: grim, cynical, tense
  • Pacing: steady, deliberate
Why these movies?

The story pattern: These narratives often follow a flawed investigator navigating a corrupt institution. The quest for justice becomes morally compromised, leading to an ambiguous or bleak conclusion that questions the very foundations of law and order. The villain may be within the system itself.

Why they belong together: These films are united by their heavy, grim atmosphere and their thematic focus on the failures and corrupting nature of the justice system. They share a tone of cynicism, feature unsettling violence, and leave the audience with a sense of unresolved moral unease.

If you liked this

Movies Like The Interview

Similar movies to The Interview: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

The Interview (1998) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about The Interview in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app