Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

The Post (2017) movie poster

Plot Summary

The Post (2017) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2017 · 116 min · Chinese
Echo score 80
Loading streaming availability…
Directed by
Steven Spielberg
Starring
Tom Hanks, Carrie Coon, Michael Stuhlbarg, Alison Brie, Zach Woods, Bradley Whitford
Budget
$50M

In this gripping drama, Steven Spielberg directs Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks in the true story of Katharine Graham, the publisher of The Washington Post. Facing immense pressure, she partners with editor Ben Bradlee to challenge government secrecy and publish the Pentagon Papers. This high-stakes decision puts their careers and the newspaper’s future at risk as they expose decades of concealed information.

On this page (6)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Movies like The Post
  6. 6 Every angle
Loading streaming availability…

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in The Post: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of The Post (2017) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

In late 1965, during the midst of the Vietnam War, Daniel Ellsberg (Matthew Rhys) finds himself in Hau Giang Province alongside other soldiers, tasked with monitoring the battle's progress for his role at the Embassy. One night, while traversing the dark forest, they come under fire from unseen enemy snipers.

On his return flight, Ellsberg converses with Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (Bruce Greenwood), sharing insights with the Chief of Staff about the disheartening realities of the war. Despite Ellsberg's declaration that "nothing has changed," McNamara grimly notes that this signifies a deteriorating situation. Upon arrival, McNamara misleads the press, asserting that conditions are improving.

Later, filled with determination, Ellsberg covertly exits the Pentagon armed with classified Vietnam War documents. In secrecy, he collaborates with colleagues to reproduce these papers. As he delves into their contents, he uncovers a troubling truth: four U.S. presidents—Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson—had allegedly concealed significant facts about the war from both the public and the press.

Fast forward to 1971, Washington, D.C., where Kay Graham (Meryl Streep) is poised to take The Washington Post public. During a meeting with a colleague, she learns from Chief of Staff that President Nixon is displeased with her newspaper's potential coverage of his daughter's wedding. In a session with her managing editor, Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks), she contemplates broadening their content to attract a diverse readership.

In a tense board meeting dominated by men, one associate, Arthur Parsons (Bradley Whitford), voices his skepticism regarding Graham's leadership, attributing his doubts partly to her gender and the stigma of being the widow of the former publisher, who tragically passed away under mysterious circumstances.

Furthermore, McNamara makes an unexpected visit to Graham at her residence, warning her that the following day’s paper might contain unfavorable coverage about him. Meanwhile, Bradlee dispatches an intern to the New York Times for insight into an impending report by journalist Neil Sheehan ([Michael Stuhlbarg]). The intern returns with intelligence that the Times is preparing a groundbreaking piece regarding McNamara.

As events unfold, The Times publishes its explosive story about the Pentagon Papers, revealing the government's extensive cover-up. During dinner with Times editor Abe Rosenthal, Graham learns that Nixon intends to take legal action against the publication.

Post journalist Ben Bagdikian (Bob Odenkirk) relentlessly pursues Ellsberg until they can meet in a motel where Ellsberg entrusts him with more than 1,000 printed documents. Excitedly, Bagdikian informs Bradlee, rallying fellow journalists such as Meg Greenfield (Carrie Coon) and Howard Simons (David Cross) to strategize about the impending story.

As they brace for possible legal repercussions, Bradlee enlists lawyers Roger Clark (Jesse Plemons) and Anthony Essaye (Zach Woods). Amid this turbulence, Graham shares her trepidations with her daughter Lally (Alison Brie), expressing her struggles in managing the publication while honoring her late husband’s legacy. Lally reassures her mother, providing much-needed support.

Despite the looming threat of litigation, Graham resolves to proceed with publishing the explosive story. The following day, The Post releases its front-page article, sparking a domino effect that compels other newspapers to follow suit.

Graham finds herself in the Supreme Court as the stakes rise for both The Post and The Times. When a call comes in at The Post announcing that the court has ruled in their favor, Greenfield triumphantly reveals a quote from a justice stating, > "the court rules in favor of the governed, not the governors."

In a moment of camaraderie, Bradlee meets Graham at the publishing station, and they stroll together, deep in conversation. Meanwhile, tensions bubble over in the White House as Nixon orders that anyone from The Post be barred from his presence. The culmination of these events leads to a critical encounter at the Watergate Hotel, where a guard discovers a break-in, setting the stage for further upheaval.

Last updated: November 03, 2024 at 23:29

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

The Post Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about The Post (2017): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why did Daniel Ellsberg leak the Pentagon Papers?

Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers because he discovered that four U.S. presidents, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson, had systematically concealed the true nature of the Vietnam War from the public and Congress. After experiencing the war's harsh realities firsthand in Vietnam and witnessing Secretary McNamara lie to the press about progress, Ellsberg felt a moral obligation to expose the decades-long government deception. His decision was driven by a belief that the public had a right to know the truth about a war that was costing thousands of American lives.

Foreshadowing: Earlier scenes show Ellsberg witnessing the disconnect between what he saw in Vietnam and what McNamara told the press, planting the seed of his eventual action.

  • daniel ellsberg
  • pentagon papers
  • leak
  • vietnam war
  • government deception
Q2

What did the Pentagon Papers reveal?

The Pentagon Papers were a classified Department of Defense study detailing the history of U.S. involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. The documents revealed that multiple presidential administrations had systematically misled the public about the war's progress, including overstating success and downplaying the likelihood of victory despite internal knowledge that the war was unwinnable. The revelation exposed a profound breach of public trust between the government and the American people.

  • pentagon papers
  • vietnam war
  • government cover-up
  • classified documents
  • president kennedy
  • president johnson
Q3

Why was Kay Graham hesitant to publish the Pentagon Papers?

Graham faced multiple sources of hesitation: she was new to publishing leadership as the widow of the former publisher, male colleagues questioned her competence in board meetings, and the newspaper was about to go public, making legal liability a major financial risk. Additionally, President Nixon had expressed personal displeasure about her paper's coverage of his daughter's wedding, creating political pressure. She also feared the personal and professional consequences of defying a sitting president during a time of intense government scrutiny.

Foreshadowing: Earlier scenes show Arthur Parsons openly challenging her leadership in a boardroom dominated by men, highlighting the institutional resistance she faced.

  • kay graham
  • washington post
  • hesitation
  • publishing
  • legal risk
  • nixon
Q5

How did the Supreme Court rule in favor of The Post?

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of The Washington Post and The New York Times, declaring that the government had failed to meet the heavy burden of proof required to prior restrain the press. The ruling emphasized that the press serves as a check on government power and that "the court rules in favor of the governed, not the governors." This landmark decision affirmed the First Amendment right to publish matters of public importance, even when the government claims national security concerns.

  • supreme court
  • ruling
  • first amendment
  • press freedom
  • constitution
  • governed
Q6

Why did McNamara visit Kay Graham to warn her?

McNamara visited Graham to warn her that the next day's paper might contain unfavorable coverage about him, likely referencing his role in the Vietnam War deception documented in the Pentagon Papers. This visit was strategically timed to create personal pressure on Graham, leveraging their social relationship to influence her editorial decision. It demonstrated how deeply connected the government cover-up was to individuals still in positions of power who had much to lose from publication.

  • robert mcnamara
  • kay graham
  • warning
  • vietnam war
  • pentagon papers
Q7

What is the connection between the Pentagon Papers and Watergate?

The film ends with a guard discovering a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate complex, which directly led to Nixon's resignation. While the Pentagon Papers exposed past government deception, Watergate revealed ongoing illegal activities by the Nixon administration. The connection is symbolic: the publication of the Pentagon Papers emboldened journalists to investigate further, and the same investigative spirit eventually brought down a president. Both events represent the press's role in holding government accountable.

  • watergate
  • nixon
  • connection
  • democratic national committee
  • break-in
  • resignation
Q8

Why was Kay Graham's leadership at The Post questioned?

Graham's leadership was questioned primarily because she was a woman in a male-dominated industry during the early 1970s, and she had inherited the newspaper through her late husband rather than earning it through traditional journalistic credentials. Board member Arthur Parsons explicitly voiced skepticism about her abilities, citing both her gender and the stigma of being a widow who took over a family business. Additionally, her lack of experience in editorial decisions made some believe she was unprepared for the high-stakes moment.

  • kay graham
  • leadership
  • the post
  • gender discrimination
  • board
  • arthur parsons
Q9

How did The Post's publication affect other newspapers?

The Post's decision to publish the Pentagon Papers created what became known as the "Washington Post effect", a domino situation where newspapers across the country rushed to publish their own stories about the documents. The Post's brave decision validated other news organizations to follow suit despite the legal risks, transforming a single newspaper's act of courage into a nationwide journalistic movement. This collective action demonstrated the power of a free press to collectively challenge government secrecy.

  • newspapers
  • publication
  • domino effect
  • washington post
  • other papers
  • media
Q10

What happened to Daniel Ellsberg after leaking the documents?

Ellsberg was charged with theft, conspiracy, and violating the Espionage Act, facing up to 115 years in prison. His trial became a symbol of the government's attempt to suppress whistleblowers, but the case was dismissed in 1973 due to prosecutorial misconduct, including illegal evidence gathering by the Nixon administration. His actions, while controversial, are credited with helping to end American involvement in Vietnam and inspiring future whistleblowers.

  • daniel ellsberg
  • after
  • charges
  • trial
  • espionage act
  • prison
  • whistleblowers

Movie threads

More Movies Like The Post, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes The Post tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Urgent race against time movies like The Post

Stories where characters face immense pressure as a deadline looms. If you liked the tense, high-pressure atmosphere of The Post, explore these movies featuring urgent countdowns and high-stakes deadlines. These films capture a similar feeling of racing against the clock where characters face immense consequences.

  • urgent
  • high-stakes
  • tense
  • anxious
  • gripping
  • determined
  • Tone: tense, urgent, anxious
  • Pacing: steady, methodical, building
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Narratives in this thread typically center on a rapidly approaching deadline or a critical window of opportunity. The plot is driven by the escalating pressure as characters work tirelessly, often facing obstacles that threaten to derail their mission at any moment.

Why they belong together: Movies are grouped here for their shared emphasis on urgency and high-pressure scenarios. They create a consistent, tense mood where the pacing and intensity are driven by the ticking clock, making the viewer feel the characters' anxiety and determination.

Movies about moral courage like The Post

Individuals risking everything to expose corruption and uphold principles. For viewers who appreciated the theme of ethical courage in The Post, this list highlights similar films about individuals standing up to powerful institutions. Discover movies that explore the heavy weight and high stakes of moral decisions.

  • thought-provoking
  • determined
  • high-stakes
  • tense
  • moral dilemma
  • gripping
  • Tone: tense, thought-provoking, determined
  • Pacing: steady, deliberate
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern follows an individual or small group uncovering a deep-seated injustice or lie. They face intense pressure from a powerful establishment, leading to a climactic confrontation where their ethics and resolve are tested, often culminating in a hard-won victory for truth.

Why they belong together: These films are connected by their central theme of moral fortitude in the face of systemic opposition. They share a heavy emotional weight, a tense tone, and a focus on the personal journey of making a principled, world-changing decision.

If you liked this

Movies Like The Post

Similar movies to The Post: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

The Post (2017) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about The Post in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app