Section 375

A principled senior criminal barrister who insists that law is a fact and justice is abstract. He probes the accuser's case with cool logic, challenging evidence and witness testimony. His professional detachment clashes with his empathy for fairness, shaping a methodical but morally loaded defense.

Anjali Dangle is the assistant costume designer who files the rape allegation against Rohan. Her actions drive the case and push the legal system into a confrontation over consent, power, and reputation. She navigates vulnerability and agency as the legal battle unfolds.

A fervent lawyer who prosecutes the case and was once Tarun's trainee. She fights for justice with passion, choosing to engage emotionally in the proceedings, which clashes with Tarun's philosophy. Her evolution from firm associate to a more morally engaged advocate is central to the conflict.

The accused, a powerful figure who belittles Anjali and uses his influence to try to derail the case. His confidence collapses as evidence mounts and the court examines his actions and promises. He embodies the conflict between privilege and accountability.

Rohan's wife who indicates she will not aid him and ultimately distances herself from him. She represents a domestic, relational lens on the case and the social repercussions of a public accusation. Her stance signals the personal cost of the legal battle.

A session court judge who weighs the initial verdict and deals with case complexities, maintaining formal decorum amid public scrutiny. He grapples with balancing the letter of the law against the pressures of public opinion. His rulings demonstrate the weight of precedent in a high-profile case.

A member of the bench who deliberates with the other judges and contributes to the verdict. She embodies judicial restraint, focusing on the evidentiary record and legal standards. Her involvement underscores the complexities of delivering a decision in a case that captures national attention.