Court

Narayan Kamble, a teacher, activist and protest singer, is arrested on charges that he prompted Vasudev Pawar to commit suicide through his songs. The prosecution argues that his music influenced the worker to take his own life. The arrest marks the initial spark of a courtroom drama revolving around motive, influence, and accountability.

Kamble is brought before a court and granted bail after a hearing. The defense argues for his release while the investigation continues. The decision highlights the tension between civil liberty and ongoing criminal inquiry.

During testimony Kamble concedes he sang several songs about suicide but cannot confirm he sang that specific day or intended to provoke self-harm. He asserts he does not act with the intent to incite others and says his memory of the day is unclear. The exchange underscores the central question of whether art can influence real-world actions.

A witness testifies that he saw Pawar singing Kamble's song, attempting to connect the artist to the alleged influence. The testimony raises questions about what the witness observed and whether it establishes Kamble's responsibility. The defense challenges the credibility and weight of this account.

In the next hearing, the investigating officer reveals a link between Kamble and incarcerated Ashwin Bhagat through a letter accusing them of planning illegal activity in the city. The discovery broadens the case beyond the original suicide charge and suggests a wider alleged conspiracy. The development intensifies pressure on Kamble and his defense.

Vora explains that Bhagat was requesting Kamble to take care of his ailing mother while Bhagat was in jail, providing context to the letter. The defense argues this demonstrates Kamble's non-violent intent and personal connection rather than criminal collaboration. The exchange aims to reframe Kamble's relationship with Bhagat.

Nutan, the public prosecutor, states that Kamble possessed two banned books, raising concerns about illicit influences. Vora counters that one book is about Yoga and the other critiques certain rituals, arguing that possession does not prove criminal intent. The exchange reveals the tension between censorship, scholarly interest, and the case's political overtones.

Vora is beaten by members of the Goyamaris, illustrating the volatile atmosphere surrounding the trial and the risks faced by Kamble's defense. The assault reinforces the sense that outside groups are exerting pressure on the legal process. The incident prompts concerns about security and fairness in proceedings.

Pawar's widow testifies that her husband worked without safety gear and died from exposure to poisonous sewer gases, having lost an eye in the process. She describes him as an alcoholic who never spoke of suicide or Kamble's influence. Her testimony challenges the narrative that Kamble pushed Pawar toward death.

The autopsy report indicates Pawar died from respiratory failure due to inhalation of hydrogen sulphide, with no signs of self-harm. The medical findings undermine the prosecution's suicide theory and provide a counterpoint to earlier testimony. The defense uses the report to cast doubt on the charge of provoking suicide.

The court notes that the witness who testified against Kamble is a stock witness with a history of testifying in multiple cases, casting doubt on his reliability. The defense argues this undermines the prosecution's case against Kamble. The atmosphere in the courtroom grows tenser as credibility becomes a focal point.

Considering Kamble's deteriorating health, the court grants bail of ₹100,000 (US$1,200) with Vora posting the money. He is later arrested again on charges of conducting seditious camps under the cover of folk-artist workshops and is remanded to police custody. The sequence underscores the volatility of the case and the fragility of Kamble's situation.

The judge tells Kamble to appeal to the High Court for relief, outlining the procedural path forward. Kamble's legal team weighs this option, hoping for a more favorable review given health concerns and what has transpired in court. The guidance signals a potential strategic pivot in the case.

The film cuts to a scene showing the judge enjoying a family holiday, creating a stark contrast with the courtroom drama. Some mischievous children wake him, and he slaps one of them before the others flee. The moment adds a human, unsettling dimension to the judge's character.