Running

In the gritty middle‑class streets of 1970s America, a slim, determined runner prepares for the biggest test of his life: the 1976 Montreal Olympic marathon. Michael Andropolis is a seasoned athlete whose talent once promised a place among the world’s elite, yet his world has shifted from triumph to uncertainty. The looming Games pulse like a distant beacon, a symbol of redemption that could rewrite his story if he can find the stamina to chase it.

At home, the tension is palpable. His marriage has unraveled, and Susan is firm in her decision to end the partnership, leaving Michael to grapple with the ache of personal loss while he struggles to stay afloat financially. The bureaucratic maze of the unemployment office adds a cold, relentless pressure that mirrors the harsh discipline of his sport. Adding to the mix, his coach, Coach Walker, watches his progress with cautious skepticism, unsure whether Michael’s impulsive nature can be harnessed for Olympic success.

Inside the training camp, the rhythm of early mornings, endless mileage, and the whisper of competition creates a world where every breath feels like a negotiation between instinct and strategy. Michael’s temperament—a fierce drive that often burns out before the final stretch—forces him to confront not only the physical limits of his body but also the deeper question of who he is when the crowds fade. The film’s tone balances tense, almost claustrophobic moments of personal doubt with the expansive, hopeful vistas of the open road, suggesting that the true race may be as much internal as it is on the track.

Against this backdrop of strained relationships, institutional obstacles, and the looming pressure of an international arena, Michael stands at a crossroads. The story invites viewers to wonder whether the pursuit of a single, defining victory can mend fractured bonds and reveal an authentic self, or if the journey itself will become the measure of his worth.

Last Updated: December 04, 2025 at 17:53