The Congress

The film unfolds in a near-future era where digital likenesses can be licensed and animated into CGI stars. It follows a twenty-year arc: from the initial digitization of Robin's persona to a later revival in a world dominated by synthetic realities. The time frame blends contemporary industry ambitions with speculative technology, illustrating how memory and identity can be manipulated over decades. The story uses this timeline to explore the erosion of personal autonomy when fame becomes a programmable asset.

Abrahama City is an animated, surreal utopia born from imagination, accessible through hallucinogenic states that let users become avatars. The city blends dreamlike landscapes with real-world pressures, creating a mutable reality where identity can be reshaped at will. Miramount Studios sits as the dominant real-world power behind the digitization of Robin's likeness, turning actors into perpetual, programmable performances. The two settings intersect as a critique of corporate control over art and the commodification of celebrity.

🪙 Identity & Commodification

The movie centers on Robin's sale of her own likeness, transforming a living person into a marketable asset. It probes what happens to individuality when art becomes a tradable commodity. The ethical implications of digital copying, ownership, and consent are questioned as the line between actor and product blurs. The story asks whether true identity can survive when memories, voice, and appearance are monetized.

🌀 Reality vs Illusion

A hallucinogenic, animated world offers an escape from a deteriorating real life, challenging what is considered 'real.' Characters navigate shifting boundaries between dreamlike avatars and tangible consequences. The film uses disorienting visuals to question authenticity and the nature of experience. It suggests that illusion can be both seductive and dangerous.

✊ Resistance & Control

Robin confronts Miramount's monopoly over art and the surveillance of creative labor. Rebels interrupt the Congress, representing broader resistance against corporate domination. The narrative contrasts a utopian fantasy with a dystopian real world ruled by elite power. It explores the costs of defying a system that treats art as property.

🎭 Ethics of Art & Consent

The film raises questions about consent in a world where a person can be re-cast as a digital character without ongoing participation. Robin's crisis of conscience centers on whether transforming herself into a product can ever be justified. The consequences of unchecked technological advancement are weighed against the freedom art can offer. The story warns that the pursuit of perpetual stardom may erode fundamental human rights.