Shootout at Lokhandwala

Following Operation Blue Star in 1984, Sikh extremists flee to Bombay and violence and extortion surge in the city. The death of Khan's best officer at the hands of the attackers spurs him to act, and he seeks clearance from the police commissioner to confront those responsible. This sets the stage for a targeted crackdown on organized crime in the city.

To counter the rising threats, Khan forms the ATS by hand-picking 27 of Bombay Police's best enlisted men, inspired by the LAPD SWAT concept. He believes a focused, elite unit can tackle organized crime and terrorism more effectively. He presents the plan to the police commissioner to secure the necessary support and authority.

To confront the criminals responsible for his officer's death, Khan obtains formal clearance from Police Commissioner Krishnamurthy, giving the ATS its mandate. This authorization legitimizes their upcoming operations against the syndicate. The unit prepares for a high-stakes confrontation with armed criminals in the city.

Khan asks journalist Meeta Mattoo to cover the impending operation to deter future violence and bring public attention to the crackdown on crime. Her presence adds a media dimension to the ATS's actions and the city’s response. The intention is to pressure criminal networks through public scrutiny.

Maya, the second-in-command of Dawood Ibrahim's syndicate, runs the gang's operations in Bombay while seeking independence from Dubai and greater control over the city. His ambitions put him at odds with the police and the growing push to curb gang violence. The conflict with the ATS becomes a central focus of the crackdown.

An informant connects a string of murders in the city to Maya's gang, drawing the ATS’s attention and signaling a direct threat to public safety. The linkage justifies intensifying surveillance and raids against the gang’s operations. The investigation narrows to Maya’s network as the primary target.

The ATS closes in on a gang member, triggering Maya to retaliate by killing the informant’s relative. The violence underscores the brutal stakes of the confrontation and the risk to officers working to dismantle the network. Tensions between law enforcement and the gang escalate rapidly.

The ATS reaches out to the gang members’ families to persuade surrender, but Maya’s crew escalates the conflict by threatening officers and attempting to bribe them. The exchange reveals the gang’s willingness to deploy pressure beyond the battlefield. Public safety considerations become a central concern for the crackdown.

An informant tips off authorities that Maya's gang is located in a flat in Swati building, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri, triggering a focused police operation. The tip creates a concrete target for the ATS’s siege plan. The city watches as the noose tightens around the gang.

In November 1991, the ATS lays siege to the flat with a large force, intending to overwhelm Maya’s group. The operation draws on the unit’s training and planning to neutralize the threat with minimal collateral damage. The tense standoff showcases the city’s direct confrontation with organized crime.

Wadhwani’s son is killed during the operation, an outcome the police contest and Maya’s persistence seems to justify. Maya had allowed the child to leave to see if any occupants would surrender, but tragedy still strikes. The event underscores the human cost of the confrontation.

The gang tries to escape by various means, including contacting Dubai and bribing a senior officer, and even firing a rocket-propelled grenade as a distraction. Despite these efforts, the siege tightens, and escape becomes increasingly unlikely. The standoff tests both sides’ resolve and endurance.

Ultimately, Maya and every member of his gang are killed in the siege, bringing a violent chapter in Bombay’s crime war to a close. The operation eliminates the primary threat to the city’s safety from this network. The city breathes a sigh of relief as the immediate danger dissolves.

During the inquiry, Dhingra defends Khan and the ATS, arguing that such officers are necessary to safeguard the public. In court, Khan and the ATS are acquitted, highlighting the ongoing debate between strict policing and civil liberties. The case cements the narrative that bold, controversial measures can be vindicated over time.