Roar

American naturalist living on a nature preserve in Tanzania, Hank studies lion behavior and strives to keep his family safe. He is pragmatic, hands-on, and deeply committed to protecting the lions he studies, even at personal risk. His leadership is tested when external pressures and animal threats collide with family safety.

Hank's wife and the children's mother, Madeleine remains a steady and protective presence during the crisis. She relies on Hank's judgment while safeguarding her children and adapting to the chaotic situation. Her resolve helps anchor the family's survival strategy.

A resourceful older child who takes initiative during the crisis, including seeking help on Hank's motorcycle. He shows courage and a practical mindset that helps the family navigate threats. His quick actions reflect his growing resilience under pressure.

The middle child who reacts quickly to danger and participates in the family’s attempts to confront threats. He contributes to the group’s improvisational survival efforts. His curiosity and courage surface in moments of crisis.

The youngest member of the family, Melanie is frightened yet observant, adapting to the peril around the house. Her presence underscores the stakes of safety and the need for calm under stress. She gradually finds ways to cope and contribute to the group's survival.

Hank's local ally who warns of the committee and helps safeguard the pride. He serves as a practical partner, guiding the family and assisting in defensive maneuvers while distracting predators. His local knowledge proves crucial during the escape attempts.

A committee member who distrusts Hank's lions and advocates hunting or removing the animals. His stance reflects a conservation debate that prioritizes immediate safety over wildlife preservation. He dies during the attack, highlighting the risks of extreme positions.

Another committee member who supports aggressive action against the lions, participating in the violence that erupts. His actions embody the ethical extremes of the debate over wildlife management. He also dies during the confrontation.

Leader of the lion pride, Robbie defends his group against threats and ultimately stands up to Togar in a pivotal confrontation. He embodies the territorial instinct and communal loyalty of the pride. His presence drives much of the tension between conservation and danger.

A rogue lion whose aggressive behavior destabilizes the pride and creates direct danger for humans. Togar's confrontations with Robbie and the committee propel the crisis forward. He represents the unpredictable, mercurial side of wild predators.

Airport staff who interact with Hank's family as they try to reach safety, offering guidance and practical support during the escape maneuvers. Their presence marks the intersection of everyday life with the crisis.

A second airport staff member who assists the family during the travel disruptions caused by the crisis. Their actions help move the family toward safety, reflecting the broader community's role in survival.

Committee member present during the grant evaluation, whose presence signals the formal scrutiny of Hank's work. His role adds to the tension between scientific oversight and field realities.

Committee member whose involvement amplifies the procedural aspect of the grant review. Her stance contributes to the debate over how to balance conservation with public safety.

Committee member representing perspectives on wildlife management within the grant review process. His presence underlines the diverse viewpoints shaping Hank's fate.

Committee member whose views contribute to the overarching tension between funding conservation and risk mitigation. His stance helps frame the film's ethical discussions.

Committee member whose insights highlight the procedural and policy dimensions of wildlife research funding. Her involvement adds to the complexity of Hank's situation.

Committee member who contributes to the multi-faceted discussion on how to manage dangerous animals in a research setting. Their input reflects the external pressures on Hank's work.

Committee member whose presence adds to the ensemble of perspectives evaluating Hank's lion study. Their stance participates in the broader conversation about conservation ethics.