Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

Rain Without Thunder (1992) movie poster

Timeline

Rain Without Thunder (1992) Timeline Explained – Every Event in Order

Release, runtime and language
1992 · 85 mins · English
JustWatch #33,408 1
Directed by
Gary O. Bennett
Starring
Steve Zahn, Jeff Daniels, Austin Pendleton, Betty Buckley, Frederic Forrest, Graham Greene

This evocative faux documentary envisions a near‑future America where the state surveils every woman’s sexual activity. Central to the film is Allison Golding (Ali Thomas), condemned to life imprisonment for undergoing an abortion. Through interviews with politicians, journalists and other influential voices, the piece traces the policies and cultural shifts that paved the way for this all‑encompassing authoritarian regime.

On this page (6)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 Events in order (12)
  3. 3 Timeline questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Movies like Rain Without Thunder
  6. 6 Every angle

Where to watch

Where to Watch Rain Without Thunder (1992)

Where can you watch Rain Without Thunder? Stream, rent or buy it in the US, including on fuboTV, MGM Plus and Philo: current JustWatch availability with up-to-date prices.

Streaming availability powered by JustWatch

12 events in order · contains spoilers

Rain Without Thunder Timeline: Events in Chronological Order

Every key event of Rain Without Thunder (1992) in order, scene by scene, with when and where it takes place. Use it to untangle flashbacks, time jumps and parallel storylines, to refresh your memory before the sequel or to find the exact scene you are thinking of.

  1. Pregnancy revealed and initial discussions

    Allison discovers she is pregnant and discusses options with her boyfriend Jeremy Tanner and her family. They consider the possibility of an abortion abroad due to U.S. fetal murder laws, setting up the plan to travel for the procedure. The moment establishes the central dilemma driving the early part of the story.

    Where
    Allison's family home
  2. Decision to travel abroad for termination

    Allison and Beverly decide to go overseas to terminate the pregnancy, seeking safety from restrictive domestic laws. Tanner’s later denial complicates the memory of support, while the family remains invested in the plan. The choice marks a bold break from the domestic legal landscape.

    Where
    Home
  3. Societal trajectory against civil liberties

    Interviews reveal a society slowly curtailing civil liberties in the name of fighting 'hypercrime'. The narrative frames a broader context where reproductive rights become increasingly vulnerable. This backdrop foreshadows the legal shifts impacting Allison and Beverly.

    When
    Early 21st century
    Where
    United States
  4. Warrants loosened and abortion criminalized

    Restrictions on warrants are loosened and several states pass laws criminalizing abortion. Initially, only abortionists are targeted, and feminists underestimate how quickly the situation will worsen. The legal climate grows harsher for those seeking abortions.

    Where
    United States
  5. Church influence weakens feminism

    The Roman Catholic Church accepts barrier contraception, contributing to a weakening of feminist power and support. This shift accelerates anti-abortion sentiment and legislative momentum. The cultural landscape becomes more hostile to reproductive rights.

    Where
    United States
  6. Personhood amendment and legal shifts

    A wave of anti-abortion legislation culminates in a constitutional amendment defining personhood at conception. This fundamental redefinition tightens the restrictions on abortion and reshapes legal rights surrounding pregnancy. The punitive framework expands beyond doctors to others involved.

    Where
    United States
  7. Laws target women seeking abortions

    Following the amendment, laws are enacted that directly target women seeking abortions, and feminism becomes politically incorrect with revisionist narratives about its impact. The enforcement landscape broadens to penalize those pursuing termination.

    Where
    United States
  8. New York classifies going abroad as fetal kidnapping

    New York passes a law that classifies traveling abroad for an abortion as 'fetal kidnapping'. Beverly is aware of the change but doubts when it would be enforced. The legal risk becomes more concrete for families seeking abroad options.

    Where
    New York
  9. Walker Point cases illustrate enforcement bias

    Interviews from Walker Point show how fetal murder laws are applied in ways that disproportionately affect poor minority women. The stories illustrate the human cost and inconsistencies in enforcement. The environment underscores the urgency of legal reform or resistance.

    Where
    Walker Point
  10. DA Murdoch begins prosecution of the Goldrings

    African American district attorney Andrea Murdoch discovers the Goldrings' actions and prosecutes them under the new fetal murder framework. Critics question her motives, while she is portrayed as responding to systemic disparities in enforcement. The case highlights race and class dynamics in the application of the law.

    Where
    New York
  11. The trial: Allison testifies and confesses

    During the trial, Allison takes the stand and confesses to what she did. She does not express remorse at the time and later explains a sense of relief from speaking out. Her confession condemns both Allison and Beverly to potential prison sentences.

    Where
    Courtroom
  12. Pathology and aftermath

    The Swedish clinic later determines the fetus had been dead for almost three weeks prior to the procedure. The Goldrings are released, but Murdoch vows to prosecute them for attempted fetal kidnapping based on their intent. The ending frames ongoing legal peril despite a procedural outcome.

    Where
    Court / Clinic

Last updated: October 09, 2025 at 09:23

Was this helpful?

Timeline questions answered

Rain Without Thunder Timeline Explained: Your Questions Answered

When does it happen, and why in that order? The questions people ask about the chronology of Rain Without Thunder (1992): time jumps, flashbacks, cause and effect between scenes and the correct order of events, each answered with spoilers.

Q1

Why does the prosecutor continue pursuing charges after the Swedish clinic confirms the fetus was already dead?

District Attorney Andrea Murdoch prosecutes the Goldrings for attempted fetal kidnapping based on their intent to commit the crime, regardless of the actual outcome. The legal framework in this society treats the act of traveling abroad to terminate a pregnancy as a separate offense from whether the fetus was viable. This reflects the film's central theme: the system prioritizes ideological enforcement over factual circumstances. Murdoch's decision to pursue intent-based charges demonstrates how the law has evolved to punish not just actions but thoughts and plans, leaving individuals vulnerable even when the original crime technically did not occur.

  • attempted fetal kidnapping
  • prosecution intent
  • Andrea Murdoch
  • legal framework
  • state enforcement
Q2

Why does Allison confess on the stand and show no remorse for having the abortion?

Allison confesses during the trial because she wants to publicly affirm her decision rather than hide behind legal technicalities. She experiences relief in finally voicing her choice openly, which contrasts sharply with the legal system's attempt to frame her as a criminal. Her lack of remorse reflects her belief that she did nothing wrong, it was her body and her choice. However, her confession carries severe consequences for both herself and her mother Beverly, as it provides direct evidence that could convict them under the fetal murder statute.

  • Allison Goldring
  • confession
  • trial testimony
  • remorse
  • bodily autonomy
Q3

How did abortion become criminalized as fetal murder in this society?

The society depicted in the film gradually criminalizes abortion through a series of legal and cultural shifts. It starts with anti-abortion legislation targeting abortionists, while feminists underestimate how quickly the situation will worsen. The Roman Catholic Church's acceptance of barrier contraception weakens feminist momentum. This culminates in a constitutional amendment defining personhood at conception, followed by laws that directly target women seeking abortions. The film shows how civil liberties are progressively trimmed in the name of fighting 'hypercrime,' with warrants becoming looser and several states passing increasingly restrictive laws.

  • fetal murder law
  • personhood amendment
  • anti-abortion legislation
  • criminalization timeline
Q4

What is fetal kidnapping and why does traveling abroad for an abortion qualify as this crime?

Fetal kidnapping is a legal category created to criminalize any attempt to circumvent abortion restrictions by traveling to jurisdictions where the procedure remains legal. In New York, the law classifies going abroad for a termination as 'fetal kidnapping,' treating the act of crossing state or national borders to obtain an abortion as a crime against the fetus. This represents an expansion of fetal murder statutes beyond actual procedures performed within the country, effectively criminalizing the intention and planning involved in seeking reproductive care elsewhere.

  • fetal kidnapping
  • traveling abroad
  • abortion law
  • crossing state lines
  • legal jurisdiction
Q5

Why does District Attorney Andrea Murdoch choose to prosecute the Goldrings?

Andrea Murdoch, an African American district attorney, prosecutes the Goldrings under the new fetal murder framework. While critics question whether her motives are purely legal, the film suggests she is responding to broader concerns about biased enforcement of these laws, particularly how they have disproportionately affected poor minority women, as illustrated by the Walker Point cases. However, her pursuit of the Goldrings also raises questions about whether prosecutorial ambition and the desire to make a political statement within a flawed system drive her decisions.

  • Andrea Murdoch
  • district attorney
  • prosecutorial motives
  • racial dynamics
  • Walker Point cases
Q6

What are the Walker Point cases and why are they significant to the story?

The Walker Point cases are real legal proceedings featured in interviews that illustrate how fetal murder laws have been disproportionately applied to poor minority women. One woman describes using a dangerous abortifacient called a 'baby bomb,' while another was convicted for using an IUD, a stark example of how the law casts an extremely wide net. These cases demonstrate the racial and class biases inherent in the enforcement of anti-abortion legislation, showing that the system targets vulnerable women while potentially allowing more privileged ones to evade consequences.

  • Walker Point
  • fetal murder enforcement
  • class bias
  • racial disparity
  • poor women
Q7

Why does the Church accepting barrier contraception weaken the feminist movement in the film?

The Roman Catholic Church's acceptance of barrier contraception removes a major point of contention between religious institutions and reproductive rights advocates. This shift weakens feminist political momentum because one of the movement's key arguments, that the Church's opposition to birth control represented an attack on women's autonomy, loses its urgency. With the Church no longer actively opposing contraception, feminist unity and political leverage diminish, allowing anti-abortion legislation to advance more easily.

  • Catholic Church
  • barrier contraception
  • feminist movement
  • religious politics
  • reproductive rights
Q8

What is hypercrime in this dystopian society and how does it affect citizens?

Hypercrime is the umbrella term used by officials to justify expanding state surveillance and eroding civil liberties. The film portrays hypercrime as a vague but powerful concept that allows authorities to justify increasingly invasive monitoring of citizens' private lives, particularly women's sexual activity. This framework enables the state to surveil every woman's reproductive decisions and criminalize behavior previously considered private medical matters. The term reflects how authoritarian regimes use vague security threats to consolidate power and control populations.

  • hypercrime
  • surveillance
  • state control
  • civil liberties
  • dystopian society
Q9

Why are the Goldrings released from custody despite Allison's confession?

The Goldrings are released after a Swedish medical review confirms the fetus had been dead for nearly three weeks before the procedure was performed. This medical evidence creates a technical legal defense, since the fetus was not alive, the argument for fetal murder becomes legally complicated. However, their release is temporary. Prosecutor Murdoch immediately declares her intention to pursue charges for attempted fetal kidnapping, arguing that the family's intent to commit the crime is sufficient for prosecution, even though the act itself never technically occurred.

  • Goldring release
  • Swedish clinic
  • medical evidence
  • attempted fetal kidnapping
  • legal technicality
Q10

Why is Allison's mother Beverly also prosecuted for the abortion?

Beverly Goldring is prosecuted because she assisted Allison in planning and arranging the travel abroad for the termination. Under the expanded fetal murder and fetal kidnapping statutes, anyone who helps facilitate an abortion, including family members who provide support, transportation, or financial assistance, can be charged as an accomplice. The law casts a wide net to discourage communities from supporting women seeking abortions. Beverly's prosecution demonstrates how the legislation targets not just the pregnant woman but everyone involved in her decision.

  • Beverly Goldring
  • accomplice liability
  • family prosecution
  • support network
  • legal expanded scope
Q11

What happens to Jeremy Tanner after Allison's abortion and the subsequent trial?

Jeremy Tanner, Allison's boyfriend and the father of the fetus, is also charged as an accomplice in the Goldring case. Early in the film, both Allison and Beverly claim that Jeremy supported her decision to travel abroad for the termination. However, his later denial of this support raises questions about whether he will testify against the Goldrings or maintain loyalty to the family. His legal fate remains uncertain as part of the broader prosecution of all three individuals involved in planning and executing the abortion.

  • Jeremy Tanner
  • boyfriend
  • accomplice
  • support denial
  • trial testimony

Movie threads

More Movies Like Rain Without Thunder, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes Rain Without Thunder tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Dystopian Legal Dramas like Rain Without Thunder

Stories where the legal system becomes an instrument of oppression. If you liked the chilling premise of Rain Without Thunder, discover more movies like it where the legal system is the antagonist. These films explore similar themes of state-sponsored persecution, authoritarian law, and the fight for individual rights in a near-future world gone wrong.

  • oppressive
  • thought-provoking
  • chilling
  • dystopian
  • legal drama
  • authoritarian
  • Tone: dark, tense, sobering
  • Pacing: steady, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: These narratives typically follow a protagonist who becomes a victim or a challenger of a newly implemented, unjust legal framework. The plot unfolds through a combination of personal struggle and systemic examination, often revealing how ordinary lives are crushed by ideological enforcement masquerading as law.

Why they belong together: Movies are grouped here for their shared focus on legal systems as a primary source of conflict in a dystopian setting. They create a specific kind of intellectual and emotional tension by showing how abstract laws have concrete, devastating consequences for individuals.

Movies about Methodical Societal Collapse like Rain Without Thunder

Slow-burn stories documenting the quiet rise of authoritarianism. For viewers who appreciated the steady, documentary-style build of dread in Rain Without Thunder, this section collects similar movies about the slow rise of authoritarianism. These stories methodically trace the political and cultural shifts that lead to a bleak future, creating a sobering and anxious vibe.

  • slow burn
  • anxious
  • sobering
  • thought-provoking
  • dystopian
  • political
  • Tone: dark, chilling, anxious
  • Pacing: steady, slow burn
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern involves a forensic examination of the steps leading to a dystopian outcome. Instead of a fast-paced revolution, these stories show the gradual implementation of policies, cultural shifts, and surveillance that normalize oppression, making the descent feel terrifyingly plausible.

Why they belong together: These films share a specific pacing and tone; they are steady, dark, and intellectually demanding. They are united by a focus on the 'how' of societal failure, creating a unique form of tension that comes from watching a terrible future being logically, inexorably constructed.

If you liked this

Movies Like Rain Without Thunder

Similar movies to Rain Without Thunder: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

Rain Without Thunder (1992) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about Rain Without Thunder in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app