Nothing So Strange

In the opening moments of the film, a high-profile public event unfolds inside the pavilion at MacArthur Park, Los Angeles, on Thursday, December 2, 1999. Bill Gates, represented on screen by a Gates double, steps onto the stage to present a one-million-dollar donation to “Literacy For Life” as part of the ongoing efforts of the Bill Gates Foundation. The mood of celebration quickly shatters when a sniper takes aim, delivering a fatal shot that first hits the right shoulder and then the head, leaving the crowd stunned and the ceremony abruptly cut short.

As chaos erupts, a frantic chase leads through an abandoned building where a rookie police officer, in a tense confrontation, fatally shoots Alek J. Hidell—an alias associated with Lee Harvey Oswald—ending the pursuit of the unknown shooter. In the aftermath, district attorney Gil Garcetti files a report naming Hiddell as the assassin, and the case is closed, supposedly solved. The film then moves forward with Gates no longer appearing in the plot, referenced only as a wealthy and beloved public figure whose death remains the central mystery being investigated. The official narrative hints at anti-Gates sentiment, but such threads are kept faint, with the word “Microsoft” barely surfacing in dialogue or context.

This is the frame for a very different story, one told by a group that is not satisfied with the official line. A grassroots collective emerges—Citizens for Truth—dedicated to reexamining the available evidence and challenging the version of events presented to the public. Their pursuit is patient and persistent, driven by a desire to see beyond the surface and to ask whether the most straightforward explanation truly accounts for what happened. As the group digs deeper, they uncover details and inconsistencies that sow reasonable doubt about Hiddell’s guilt and invite readers to consider the possibility that the real assassin might still be at large.

What follows is a portrait of a movement in microcosm: a mockumentary that tracks the rise of this investigative group from a small, motivated faction to a more organized and politically visible entity. The narrative traces how their findings, debates, and public appearances fuel momentum, attract attention, and shape discourse around the assassination. The tone remains measured and analytical, but the film does not shy away from showing how quickly public interest can turn, how credibility can wax and wane, and how a movement born from doubt can achieve prominence before slipping back into relative obscurity.

Throughout, the film balances its reverence for Gates’ public image with a cautious examination of the fragility of truth in the face of competing narratives. It invites viewers to weigh fragments of evidence, consider alternate possibilities, and reflect on the dynamics that govern how societies remember and interpret dramatic events. In the end, the annual convention marks a peak in the group’s influence, but its subsequent rapid decline underscores the precarious nature of truth-seeking when confronted with political resonance, media attention, and the limits of evidence.

Last Updated: October 09, 2025 at 16:53