Kathal

The story unfolds in the town of Moba and expands to nearby Chhatarpur in Madhya Pradesh, reflecting a regional backdrop of local politics and police work. The setting blends a small-town atmosphere with larger political and criminal networks, providing a grounded stage for the investigation into missing people and jackfruits. This backdrop anchors the film's commentary on governance, law enforcement, and social dynamics in contemporary India.

♀️ Gender bias

Inspector Mahima Basor faces caste-based discrimination from subordinates and superiors, highlighting how gender and social hierarchies influence police work. The narrative centers her resolve to challenge patriarchal norms and demand fair recognition. Bias shapes decisions, testing her commitment to truth over status. The film uses her perspective to critique systemic sexism within law enforcement.

🚨 Trafficking

Amiya's disappearance exposes a human trafficking operation led by Gulab Seth, connecting local politics, policing, and criminal networks. The investigation travels from the MLA's circle to distant towns, revealing gaps in protection for vulnerable girls. The case underscores the reformist drive to curb trafficking and safeguard victims. It also shows how powerful interests attempt to control information.

⚖️ Justice vs Power

The film pits pursuit of truth against political and administrative pressure, emphasizing that real justice requires listening to neglected cases (like missing girls) despite convenient sensational stories. Mahima's actions critique how promotions and power can distort investigative priorities. The courtroom moment reinforces the idea that integrity and evidence should prevail over appearances. The conclusion celebrates accountability and systemic change, not just individual victories.

😂 Comic twist

In a final twist, the film reveals the jackfruits' disappearance was a red herring—monkeys were responsible—underscoring the satirical tone. This ending underscores the absurdities within bureaucratic obsession with trivial cases at the expense of serious harms. It also serves as a punchline about misdirected public attention and the comic relief woven into the drama. The twist reinforces the film’s critique of misplaced priorities.