10 Kalpanakal

Angel is found dead in a forest after a festival, triggering an investigation led by Shazia Akbar. She enters the case but is unable to solve it due to the lack of a convincing suspect or motive. The incident remains an unresolved tragedy from the early phase of her career.

Years after Angel's death, Shazia investigates a psychopath named Victor who abducts women and keeps them in his house. He stores photographs of his victims, and Angel's image surfaces among his gallery. This new case ties Angel's fate to a broader pattern of violence.

Shazia reaches out to Davis and together they try to extract truth from Victor. They pursue whatever information Victor can reveal about Angel and the other victims. The alliance marks a crucial shift in the investigation.

Davis suspects Vakkachan and tensions rise as Vakkachan denies involvement while threatening to end Davis if accused. The mistrust complicates the pursuit of a clear perpetrator and adds a layer of paranoia to the case. The standoff heightens as motives remain unclear.

Victor requests a conversation with Davis and claims he witnessed the actual murder, asserting that the original killer was John, Davis's son. The revelation shifts the focus of suspicion and stirs Davis emotionally. The claim reorients the narrative toward familial ties.

Davis experiences a painful dilemma as circumstantial evidence points to John, including late returns and a collection of Angel's photos. John's tense demeanor intensifies the suspicion and strains Davis's role as father and investigator. The emotional conflict deepens without a confirmed killer.

To press for truth, Davis takes John to a statue of Jesus and makes him beg for forgiveness. He draws a revolver, threatening to shoot his own son. The scene tests the boundaries between justice, fear, and paternal duty.

During the confrontation, John reveals that he did meet Angel on the night she died, but the last time he saw her was before returning home. This confession muddies the killer's identity and sustains suspense about who actually killed Angel. The truth remains elusive as the investigation presses on.

On the way to court, Victor reveals that his earlier claim about John killing Angel was a manipulation to mislead Davis and cloud his emotions. This strategic deception further complicates the judicial process. The truth remains unsettled as the case nears trial.

In court, Victor is relieved of all accusations because the evidence fails to prove his involvement. Shazia views the outcome as a failure, since Angel's killer remains unproven and justice feels incomplete. The courtroom ends with unresolved tensions.

After the court, Shazia visits Davis, whose house sits near the institution where she lectured. They discuss the elusive truth and the emotional toll of the case. The meeting signals a fragile attempt at closure that remains precarious.

Davis confines Victor at his own house, seeking vigilante justice over formal proceedings. Victor pleads with Shazia to persuade Davis to kill him, but they share a conspiratorial smile as she walks away. The ending leaves Victor suffering and the line between justice and vengeance blurred.