Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

Killing for Love (2017) movie poster

Plot Summary

Killing for Love (2017) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2017 · 130 min · English
Loading streaming availability…
Directed by
Karin Steinberger, Marcus Vetter
Starring
Imogen Poots, Carlos Santos, Chuck Reid, Daniel Brühl, Dave Watson, Ed Sulzbach

In 1985, the brutal murders of Derek and Nancy Haysom in Virginia captivated the nation. The subsequent trial of their daughter, Elizabeth Haysom, and her boyfriend, Jens Soering—the son of a German diplomat—became a source of intense public scrutiny, raising complex questions about guilt, justice, and the devastating consequences of obsession. The case explored themes of betrayal and the possibility of an innocent man bearing the burden for a crime he did not commit.

On this page (5)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Every angle
Loading streaming availability…

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in Killing for Love: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of Killing for Love (2017) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

On March 30, 1985, the brutal murders of Derek and Nancy Haysom shocked the small town of Lynchburg, Virginia. Initially investigated by local police, the case eventually drew the attention of the sheriff's department and the FBI. Fast forward five years to June 21, 1990, when Jens Söring, the boyfriend of the Haysoms' daughter, Elizabeth Haysom, was convicted of first-degree murder for the deaths of her parents, receiving two life sentences. Concurrently, Elizabeth, deemed an "accessory before the fact," accepted a plea deal resulting in a staggering 90-year sentence. Exclaiming, >"I'm innocent," Söring has maintained his claim of innocence ever since.

The investigation reveals dark undercurrents—what truly unfolded that fateful night in Bedford County? A dedicated team, including Jens's lawyers, former investigator Chuck Reid, and private investigator Dave Watson, works to reassemble the fragmented case. They seek a missing FBI profile while questions arise about nude photographs allegedly depicting child abuse, which may paint Elizabeth in a different light.

In the second episode, when the noose tightens around the couple, they attempt to escape. Arrested in London for check fraud while using false identities, Jens makes a fateful and life-altering decision: to confess to the murders to protect Elizabeth from the electric chair. He believed, being the son of a German diplomat, he would simply serve a brief stint in juvenile detention. This misguided sacrifice sets off a chain of events that would forever alter both of their lives.

As the series progresses, in episode three, Elizabeth returns to the US on August 24, 1987, to testify. Her plea of guilty evokes polarizing opinions—was she a victim of an obsessive relationship or a cunning criminal? Renowned psychiatrists diagnosed her as a borderline schizophrenic and a pathological liar while the revelation dawned on Jens that his father's diplomatic immunity did not cover him. Facing execution, he recanted his confession.

Subsequent episodes delve deeper into the trials, capturing the tumultuous courtroom scenes where public interest peaked. In episode four, Jens and Elizabeth's fates intertwine as her testimony builds and undermines their stories. Evaluations of competing alibis and testimony from a forensic expert raise troubling questions about evidence, including a mysterious fingerprint at the crime scene.

In the penultimate episode, belief in Jens's innocence garners support from various advocates, notably a former state employee who reviews the case and unearths inconsistencies that could exonerate him. As investigators follow new leads, attention turns to unstudied witnesses who could change the narrative entirely.

Finally, in the conclusion, Jens regrets his fateful decisions as he continues to navigate the prison system, haunted by a life sentence imposed in 1990. Years of struggle lead to a possible transfer to Germany, tantalizingly close until a new political decision bars his release. In a twist of fate, post-investigation DNA analysis on the collected evidence reveals that 11 out of 42 samples do not belong to Jens—prompting the haunting question: could the real murderer still be lurking free?

Last updated: November 16, 2024 at 12:18

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

Killing for Love Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about Killing for Love (2017): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why did Jens Soering confess to the murders he claimed he didn't commit?

Jens Soering confessed to protect Elizabeth Haysom from the death penalty. When they were arrested in London for check fraud, he believed that as the son of a German diplomat, he would receive special treatment and only serve a brief sentence in juvenile detention. He thought sacrificing himself would save Elizabeth from execution, not realizing his father's diplomatic immunity did not extend to him.

Foreshadowing: Earlier in the documentary, their desperate attempt to escape by using false identities shows the mounting pressure that led to this fateful decision.

  • jens soering confession
  • elizabeth haysom
  • london arrest
  • false identities
Q2

Why did Elizabeth Haysom testify against Jens Soering?

Elizabeth Haysom returned to the US on August 24, 1987, to testify after reaching a plea deal. She pleaded guilty to being an accessory before the fact and received a 90-year sentence. Her testimony undermined Jens's story and supported the prosecution's case, though psychiatrists later diagnosed her as a borderline schizophrenic and pathological liar, raising questions about the reliability of her account.

Foreshadowing: The documentary establishes early on that Elizabeth's relationship with Jens was marked by obsession and manipulation, setting the stage for her complex testimony.

  • elizabeth haysom testimony
  • plea deal
  • accessory before fact
  • 90 year sentence
Q3

What did the DNA evidence reveal in the Haysom murder case?

Post-investigation DNA analysis on the collected evidence revealed that 11 out of 42 samples did not belong to Jens Soering. This bombshell evidence suggested that someone else was present at the crime scene and raised the disturbing possibility that the real murderer could still be free.

Foreshadowing: Earlier inconsistencies in the forensic evidence and the mysterious fingerprint at the crime scene hinted that the investigation may have focused on the wrong person.

  • dna evidence
  • 11 samples
  • forensic evidence
  • exoneration
Q4

Why was Jens Soering convicted despite his claims of innocence?

Jens was convicted in 1990 of first-degree murder for the deaths of Derek and Nancy Haysom, receiving two life sentences. The prosecution's case relied on his confession, forensic evidence, and Elizabeth's testimony. However, advocates later pointed out significant inconsistencies in the evidence, and the DNA results showing multiple unknown DNA profiles challenged the prosecution's narrative.

Foreshadowing: The documentary shows how Jens's initial confession, made to protect Elizabeth, became the cornerstone of the case against him despite his later recantation.

  • jens conviction
  • first degree murder
  • life sentence
  • evidence inconsistencies
Q5

What did psychiatric evaluations reveal about Elizabeth Haysom?

Renowned psychiatrists who evaluated Elizabeth Haysom diagnosed her with borderline schizophrenia and labeled her a pathological liar. These diagnoses raised serious questions about her credibility and whether she manipulated Jens into confessing, complicating the public's understanding of her true role in the murders.

Foreshadowing: The documentary hints at Elizabeth's unstable behavior and obsessive tendencies throughout her relationship with Jens.

  • borderline schizophrenia
  • pathological liar
  • psychiatric evaluation
  • mental health
Q6

Why did Jens Soering recant his confession?

Jens recanted his confession when he realized he faced execution and that his father's diplomatic immunity did not protect him. He had initially confessed believing he would receive lenient treatment, but when confronted with the possibility of the death penalty, he withdrew his confession and maintained his innocence.

Foreshadowing: His earlier belief that diplomatic status would shield him from serious consequences was established when they were first arrested in London.

  • recant confession
  • execution
  • diplomatic immunity
  • withdrawal
Q7

What happened to Jens Soering's transfer to Germany?

Years into his sentence, prospects appeared for Jens Soering to be transferred to Germany, which would have allowed him to serve his sentence closer to his home country. However, political decisions ultimately blocked his release, leaving him to continue serving his life sentence in the American prison system.

Foreshadowing: The documentary establishes Jens as a German citizen whose family connections to diplomacy played a role throughout the case.

  • germany transfer
  • political decision
  • release blocked
  • prison transfer
Q8

Who actually killed Derek and Nancy Haysom?

The true murderer of Derek and Nancy Haysom remains unknown. While Jens Soering was convicted, the DNA evidence showing 11 samples from an unidentified person suggests the actual killer may have never been caught. The documentary leaves this question unresolved, emphasizing the ambiguity surrounding the case.

Foreshadowing: The mysterious fingerprint at the crime scene and the competing alibis throughout the trial planted seeds of doubt about who truly committed the murders.

  • real murderer
  • unknown killer
  • dna profiles
  • unsolved case
Q9

Was Elizabeth Haysom ever released from prison?

Elizabeth Haysom accepted a plea deal as an accessory before the fact and received a 90-year sentence. The documentary does not provide specific information about her release, focusing primarily on Jens Soering's ongoing fight for exoneration and his attempts at transfer to Germany.

Foreshadowing: Her guilty plea and massive sentence were established early as the outcome of her deal with prosecutors.

  • elizabeth release
  • 90 year sentence
  • plea deal outcome
Q10

Why did the Haysom murder case attract so much public attention?

The Haysom case captivated the nation due to its multiple layers of complexity: a diplomat's son as the prime suspect, a wealthy family, sex, lies, and a possible wrongful conviction. The combination of Jens's diplomatic connections, Elizabeth's controversial testimony, the brutal nature of the murders, and the eventual questions about his innocence made it a media sensation that spanned years.

Foreshadowing: The documentary establishes from the start that this was a case that perplexed investigators and left the community searching for answers.

  • media attention
  • public interest
  • sensational case
  • high profile trial

Movie threads

More Movies Like Killing for Love, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes Killing for Love tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

True crime documentaries with ambiguous endings like Killing for Love

Documentaries that leave you questioning the official verdict and the nature of guilt itself. If you were captivated by the unresolved questions in 'Killing for Love', explore more movies like it. These documentaries present complex true crime stories where the final verdict feels uncertain, leaving you to ponder the evidence and grapple with the unsettling ambiguity of the case.

  • investigative
  • unsettling
  • somber
  • thought-provoking
  • grim
  • suspenseful
  • Tone: somber, investigative, unsettling
  • Pacing: steady, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: These narratives typically follow a meticulous, investigative structure, presenting evidence from multiple angles—prosecution, defense, and new findings. The journey is one of mounting doubt rather than clear resolution, often ending with an implicit challenge to the audience to form their own conclusion about guilt and innocence.

Why they belong together: Movies are grouped here for their shared commitment to exploring the gray areas of justice. They prioritize a somber, inquisitive mood over closure, using a steady pace to build a case for complexity, making them compelling for viewers who appreciate thought-provoking, rather than neatly resolved, true stories.

Grim investigative procedurals similar to Killing for Love

Stories where a steady, methodical investigation uncovers deeply disturbing truths. Fans of the methodical, unsettling investigation in 'Killing for Love' will find similar movies here. These films use a steady pace to delve into dark subjects, focusing on the process of uncovering difficult truths, whether in a courtroom, a newsroom, or a personal quest for answers.

  • suspenseful
  • grim
  • investigative
  • anxious
  • oppressive
  • somber
  • Tone: dark, serious, oppressive
  • Pacing: steady, deliberate
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern involves a central mystery or crime that is unraveled piece by piece. The focus is on the process—gathering evidence, conducting interviews, legal maneuvers—rather than fast-paced action. The emotional journey is one of descending into a grim reality, where each revelation adds weight and complexity, often challenging the characters' and viewers' perceptions.

Why they belong together: These movies share a specific mood mix: a serious, oppressive tone combined with a suspenseful yet steady pacing. The experience is defined by an anxious, investigative drive that leads to somber revelations, creating a cohesive vibe of grim discovery that is intellectually and emotionally engaging.

Every angle

Killing for Love (2017) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about Killing for Love in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app