Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

What to Do in Case of Fire (2002) movie poster

Plot Summary

What to Do in Case of Fire (2002) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2002 · 101 min · German
Loading streaming availability…
Directed by
Gregor Schnitzler
Starring
Nadja Uhl, Klaus Löwitsch, Sebastian Blomberg, Til Schweiger, Doris Schretzmayer, Martin Feifel

A group of former radicals in Berlin are brought back together for a risky mission: stealing damaging video evidence from the authorities. As they attempt the heist, they grapple with their shared history, current personal challenges, and the repercussions of their past actions. The experience forces them to examine their revolutionary ideals and consider whether to embrace a renewed sense of purpose or move forward with their lives.

On this page (6)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Categories
  6. 6 Every angle
Loading streaming availability…

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in What to Do in Case of Fire: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of What to Do in Case of Fire (2002) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

In 1987, a group of passionate rebels united by a relentless quest for transformation gathered in Berlin's Kreuzberg district. Within the dilapidated walls of an abandoned building, they crafted plans to challenge the established order through provocative propaganda films. One particular production demonstrated how to create a homemade bomb using easily accessible materials—an act that would resonate through time. This device was concealed in a vacant villa in Grunewald but, due to a timer malfunction, the explosive remained inactive for 12 long years.

Fast forward to the present day, and two of the original insurgents, Tim and Hotte, are still engaged in a low-grade guerrilla campaign against the authorities. Their methods involve a mix of anti-police graffiti, protests against gentrification, and minor thefts. However, their antics come under scrutiny when a real estate broker and potential buyer accidentally unearth the long-dormant bomb, triggering it with their careless interactions. The resulting explosion injures them both, prompting a police manhunt for the so-called "terrorists."

As they navigate a tangled landscape of alliances and rivalries from their past, Tim and Hotte reconnect with old comrades. Among them is Nele, a dedicated single mother; Terror, a principled lawyer; Maik, a creative director exploiting radical imagery for commercial advertising; and Flo, Tim's ex-lover, who has seemingly abandoned her rebellious ways for a life of tranquility. By sharing their distressing circumstances, each is forced to reckon with the ramifications of their youthful choices.

Facing potential arrest and a smear campaign, the remaining radicals devise a bold strategy to infiltrate police headquarters, posing as a television news crew. This risky venture holds the promise of reclaiming their lost footage, clearing their names, and rewriting the controversial story of their past. Yet, the stakes are incredibly high, with uncertainty surrounding the outcome.

Tensions rise between Manowsky]( /actor/klaus-lwitsch), a stubborn Berlin officer, and Henkel, a forward-thinking Bonn technocrat focused on public relations. This clash creates an ideal setting for the rebels’ scheme. As Henkel guides the "TV crew" through the precinct, showing them the evidence room containing damning material, Manowsky's traditional methods put their operation in jeopardy. In a tense moment, the radicals narrowly evade detection during this spontaneous tour.

In a desperate attempt to eliminate incriminating evidence, the group hatches a plot to smuggle a second homemade bomb into the evidence room, disguised as a Trojan horse—a suspicious crate from their old building. They strategically position the device, confident it will be stored alphabetically by location. However, unbeknownst to the others, Hotte will hide inside the crate, ensuring its proper placement.

Complications arise when Hotte, without his wheelchair and forced to use a dolly, becomes trapped in the evidence room after the emergency exit door jams. In a frantic effort to communicate, he attempts to contact his fellow rebels, but everyone seems preoccupied or unreachable. Left with no other choice, Hotte calls Bülent, who is simultaneously trying to convince Tim to abandon their apartment in exchange for a payout for their remaining possessions. Spurred into action, Tim rushes to support Hotte.

Finally, the others receive Hotte’s urgent call and converge on the evidence room for a rescue. However, Manowsky intercepts them just as they believe they can escape. He lectures them condescendingly about their stubborn attachment to outdated ideals, preparing to arrest them. Yet, the timely arrival of the other radicals offers a crucial distraction, allowing them to evade capture.

As events intensify, Tim seizes the moment, securing Manowsky to the evidence cage with his own handcuffs. He threatens to leave the bomb in the officer's lap but is persuaded by his comrades to refrain from murder. In a dramatic finale, Tim tosses the handcuff keys back to Manowsky, effectively leaving him restrained as alarms blare and the rebels make their daring getaway.

As they flee, an unexpected ally appears in the form of a water cannon, which they utilize to evade the police. Henkel watches, doubtful about the outcome, while Manowsky grapples with a newfound empathy for his former counterparts, reflecting on his old values and the dilemma presented by Henkel's skepticism. Driven by these wrestling emotions, he makes a pivotal choice: to leave the incriminating bomb in the evidence room, obliterating any evidence against the rebels.

In their escape through the streets of Berlin, the group finds themselves aboard an S-Bahn train, where Tim holds a crucial film to the flame of his lighter. In a moment of deep reflection, he queries, "What do you do if there's a fire?" to which his companions, in unison, reply, "Let it burn!" This moment echoes their readiness to take daring risks and challenge societal norms.

Viewers can expect a cinematic experience rich in nuanced moments, including instances of mild nudity, drug use, and mature language that add layers to the characters' journeys and struggles.

Last updated: November 19, 2024 at 18:10

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

What to Do in Case of Fire Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about What to Do in Case of Fire (2002): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why did the homemade bomb remain inactive for 12 years?

The bomb they created in 1987 was hidden in a vacant villa in Grunewald with a timer mechanism designed to activate later. However, the timer malfunctioned, causing the explosive to remain dormant for an astonishing 12 years until a real estate broker and potential buyer accidentally triggered it in the present day.

Foreshadowing: The timeline explicitly mentions the timer malfunction when the bomb is concealed in 1987, setting up the later explosion.

  • timer malfunction
  • homemade bomb
  • Grunewald
  • 12 years
  • explosion
Q2

Why did the police target Tim and Hotte after the explosion?

When the dormant bomb finally exploded in the villa, it injured a real estate broker and a potential buyer. Because the bomb was linked to their old revolutionary activities from 1987, the police launched a manhunt for the original 'terrorists' - Tim and Hotte - blaming them for the explosion and labeling them as dangerous radicals again.

  • police manhunt
  • Tim
  • Hotte
  • terrorists
  • explosion
  • suspects
Q3

Why did the group decide to infiltrate police headquarters?

Facing potential arrest and a smear campaign by authorities, the remaining rebels devised the infiltration plan to accomplish three goals: reclaim their lost propaganda footage from the evidence room, clear their names of the terrorism accusations, and rewrite the controversial story of their past actions. The plan involved posing as a television news crew to gain access.

  • infiltration
  • police headquarters
  • evidence room
  • clear names
  • TV crew
  • footage
Q4

How did Hotte end up trapped inside the evidence room?

Hotte hid inside the crate containing the second homemade bomb to ensure it was properly placed in the evidence room. However, after positioning the device, he found himself trapped when the emergency exit door jammed. Without his wheelchair and forced to use a dolly, he couldn't escape on his own, and his attempts to contact his fellow rebels initially failed because everyone was preoccupied.

  • Hotte
  • trapped
  • evidence room
  • crate
  • wheelchair
  • jammed door
Q5

Why did Tim choose not to kill Manowsky when he had the chance?

During the confrontation in the evidence room, Tim managed to handcuff Manowsky to the cage and considered leaving the bomb with him. However, his comrades convinced him not to commit murder. Despite their revolutionary past and the provocation from Manowsky's condescending lecture about their 'outdated ideals,' Tim ultimately chose not to kill and instead tossed the keys back to the officer before escaping.

  • Tim
  • Manowsky
  • handcuffs
  • murder
  • evidence room
  • escape
Q6

What happened to the second bomb the rebels smuggled into the police station?

The rebels smuggled a second homemade bomb into the evidence room, disguised as a Trojan horse inside a crate from their old building. While Hotte was trapped inside and the group was focused on escaping, the bomb was left in the evidence room. Manowsky ultimately chose to leave the bomb where it was, destroying the evidence against the rebels rather than risk detonation.

Foreshadowing: The plan was to place the bomb alphabetically by location, which later allowed Manowsky to make his pivotal choice.

  • second bomb
  • evidence room
  • Trojan horse
  • Manowsky
  • destroyed evidence
Q7

Why did the group burn their film at the end on the S-Bahn train?

Tim ignites the crucial propaganda film they had retrieved, asking 'What do you do if there's a fire?' His companions respond 'Let it burn!' This symbolic act represents their readiness to let go of their revolutionary past, embrace their identity as rebels willing to take daring risks, and move forward into an uncertain future. It marks an ambiguous farewell to their youthful ideals rather than a clear victory.

  • film
  • burn
  • S-Bahn
  • fire
  • symbolism
  • revolutionary past
  • ending
Q8

Why did Flo abandon her rebellious past and become 'normal'?

Flo, Tim's ex-lover, has seemingly abandoned her radical ways for a life of tranquility. When the group reconnects, she shares her distressing circumstances, forcing her to reckon with the ramifications of her youthful choices. Her transformation represents one of the different paths former rebels can take - some clinging to ideals while others seek normalcy.

  • Flo
  • ex-lover
  • normal life
  • rebellion
  • past choices
  • transformation
Q9

Why does Maik, a former rebel, now work in advertising?

Maik, once a passionate rebel, became a creative director who exploits radical imagery for commercial advertising. This represents the film's satirical commentary on how revolutionary ideals get commodified and commercialized. His character embodies the tension between authentic radicalism and its co-optation by consumer culture.

  • Maik
  • advertising
  • creative director
  • radical imagery
  • commercialization
  • satire
Q10

Why did Manowsky let the rebels escape instead of pursuing them?

After being handcuffed by Tim and lectured about his 'stubborn attachment to outdated ideals,' Manowsky experiences a change of heart. Watching the rebels escape with a water cannon while Henkel expresses doubt, Manowsky wrestles with empathy for his former counterparts and his old values. He makes the pivotal choice to leave the incriminating bomb in the evidence room, destroying evidence against them rather than stopping their escape.

  • Manowsky
  • police
  • empathy
  • escape
  • bomb
  • evidence
  • choice
Q11

Why did the rebels need to pose as a television news crew to infiltrate the police station?

The disguise as a TV news crew was essential because it provided a plausible reason to access restricted areas of police headquarters, particularly the evidence room. Henkel, the Bonn technocrat focused on public relations, guided the fake 'TV crew' through the precinct, creating the opportunity to reach the damning material. This scheme exploited the tensions between traditional policing methods and modern PR-focused law enforcement.

  • TV crew disguise
  • infiltration
  • police headquarters
  • evidence room
  • Henkel
  • access

Movie threads

More Movies Like What to Do in Case of Fire, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes What to Do in Case of Fire tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Movies about reuniting radicals like in What to Do in Case of Fire

A group of former activists reunites for one last high-stakes mission. For viewers who enjoyed What to Do in Case of Fire, this section features movies about former activists and radicals reuniting for a final, high-stakes mission. These films often blend heist or thriller elements with the emotional weight of confronting one's past and the complicated dynamics of a found family tested by time.

  • reunited crew
  • nostalgic
  • urgent
  • rebellious
  • found family
  • reckoning with the past
  • Tone: tense, nostalgic, urgent
  • Pacing: fast, driven by mission
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern involves a disruptive event pulling a disbanded group back into action, forcing them to reconcile their past ideals with their present circumstances. The plot often centers on a physical mission that serves as a metaphor for resolving their ideological and personal conflicts.

Why they belong together: Movies in this group share a focus on collective character arcs, the tension between nostalgia and current reality, and a compelling mix of high-stakes action with introspective drama about the compromises of adulthood.

Heist movies with emotional depth like What to Do in Case of Fire

A tense, high-stakes heist driven by personal history and redemption. If you liked the blend of a tense, fast-paced heist and the emotional weight of personal history in What to Do in Case of Fire, explore these similar movies. They feature high-stakes missions driven by character motivations, where the success of the plan is intertwined with the characters' search for redemption or closure.

  • tense
  • urgent
  • heist
  • redemption
  • moral complexity
  • found family
  • Tone: tense, dramatic, satirical
  • Pacing: fast, urgent
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The heist plot serves as the engine for exploring complex character relationships and unresolved personal history. The suspense comes not just from the risk of failure, but from the emotional consequences for the characters involved, often leading to a morally complex or bittersweet resolution.

Why they belong together: These films are grouped by their unique combination of a tightly-plotted, suspenseful heist narrative with a significant focus on character development, moral ambiguity, and the emotional reasons behind the mission.

Categories

Movie Lists Featuring What to Do in Case of Fire

What to Do in Case of Fire appears in these hand-built movie categories. Each one groups movies by a specific mood, theme or story type, with their plot summaries and endings explained.

View all movie categories

Every angle

What to Do in Case of Fire (2002) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about What to Do in Case of Fire in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app