They Came to Cordura

In 1916, Colonel Rogers, a 63-year-old officer eager for a promotion before retirement, assigns Major Thomas Thorn to act as a battlefield observer to document acts of heroism. Rogers hopes Thorn will witness acts of heroism and perhaps recognize merit in others. Thorn accepts the duty with a wary eye toward the politics of medals and promotions.

Rogers leads his regiment in an old-fashioned, poorly planned cavalry assault on Ojos Azules, a villa owned by Adelaide Geary. Thorn watches from a distance through his binoculars as Lt Fowler, Sgt Chawk, Cpl Trubee and Pvt Renziehausen perform acts of bravery against Villa's men. The scene establishes Thorn's role as observer and marks the first questions about true heroism.

Rogers basks in pride for personally leading the charge, but he is furious when Thorn refuses to nominate him for a Medal of Honor. Thorn insists that the act was 'in the line of duty' and cannot be the basis for extraordinary recognition. Rogers reminds Thorn that he once protected him from a cowardice investigation, a favor Thorn granted out of respect for his father.

Thorn intends to nominate Lieutenant Fowler, Sergeant Chawk, Corporal Trubee, and Private Renziehausen for the Medal of Honor. He believes their battlefield actions deserve recognition beyond the ordinary call of duty. The nomination plan marks Thorn's attempt to translate observed heroism into formal accolades.

Thorn is ordered to take along Adelaide Geary, who is charged with 'giving aid and comfort to the enemy.' Her presence adds tension to the expedition and tests Thorn's resolve to maintain order among the troops. The dynamic between Thorn, Geary, and the men complicates what should be a simple mission.

Private Hetherington, previously nominated for a medal, rides with Thorn to the expedition base at Cordura. His presence foreshadows further scrutiny of the soldiers' motives and the validity of their heroic acts. The group heads toward Cordura with undercurrents of suspicion and ambition.

What should be a straightforward mission devolves into a test of temper and discipline as Thorn clashes with the men. The soldiers' hostility toward Thorn grows, threatening to derail the expedition and undermine the mission's purpose. The tension foreshadows a deeper moral fracture within the group.

A series of harrowing incidents suggests that the soldiers' displays of bravery may be driven by ambition, fear, or chance rather than pure courage. Thorn observes these patterns and contrasts them with his own sense of moral responsibility. The truth emerges that heroism is more complex and personal than it first appeared.

The men turn against Thorn and become openly insubordinate, forcing him to defend himself against their aggression. The situation reaches a breaking point as Thorn must fight to protect his life and the mission's survival. The conflict exposes the dangers of group mentality and the fragility of rank under stress.

In the face of danger, Thorn's example reveals real courage—the courage to stand up for what is right even when outnumbered or opposed. He embodies the personal, inner strength that the others lack. This moment reframes heroism from battlefield spectacle to moral steadfastness.

The inciting events culminate in the realization that heroism is not just about spectacular deeds, but about personal integrity and resilience. The men begin to see the value of Thorn's moral example. The narrative suggests that true courage comes from within.

The film closes on Thorn's influence, showing that the soldiers learn personal, not physical, courage from his example. Their earlier ambitions and bravado are tempered by his moral steadfastness. The resolution emphasizes character over conquest.