La Palisiada

The film opens by presenting Oleksandr, a forensic psychiatrist living a peaceful life. However, this tranquility is soon interrupted by circumstances beyond his control.

The central event around which the narrative revolves is the brutal murder of a police officer. This tragic event sets off a chain reaction that draws Oleksandr and his friend Ilhar into a complex investigation.

As Oleksandr delves deeper into the investigation, he starts to question the validity of the law enforcement approach. He realizes that judicial experiments being conducted on suspects are fraught with lawlessness.

The investigation into the policeman's murder officially begins with Oleksandr and Ilhar collaborating closely. The duo's long-standing friendship and past experiences serve as both an asset and a burden as they navigate the murky waters of justice.

As they work on the case, they encounter the widow of the deceased policeman. This emotional twist adds layers to their investigation, further complicating their motives and objectives.

The narrative shifts to the 1990s, revealing the societal struggles and chaotic atmosphere of Ukraine during this period. This context serves to enrich the viewers' understanding of the challenges the characters face.

The film initially introduces a group of hipsters and their seemingly trivial problems. This subplot cleverly sets the stage for the more serious themes that follow, creating a contrast between eras and lifestyles.

Throughout the investigation, it becomes clear that corruption is rampant in the system. Law enforcement officers attempt to hastily sew together a criminal case to ensure a quick conviction, reflective of the turbulent post-Soviet era.

The film underscores the chaotic post-Soviet context where the distinction between right and wrong is blurred. The societal atmosphere during the 1990s is portrayed as one dominated by anti-heroes and moral ambiguity.

The narrative vividly confronts the controversial subject of the death penalty, pointing out its implications within Ukraine during the time. This issue looms large, influencing the personal and professional decisions of the characters involved.

As the investigation progresses, the complicated relationships among the characters become more apparent. The tension between friendship, loyalty, and betrayal plays a crucial role in driving the plot forward.

The film's non-linear timeline is reminiscent of a Möbius strip, where past and present intertwine. This unique storytelling approach challenges viewers to piece together the intricate web of events.

As Oleksandr and Ilhar get closer to the truth, the stakes rise, forcing them to confront moral dilemmas. They grapple with the implications of their findings and what justice truly means in such a flawed system.

The investigation reaches a conclusion, but the outcomes are far from black and white. The film leaves viewers questioning the nature of justice and the costs of truth and integrity.