Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

The Third Murder (2018) movie poster

Plot Summary

The Third Murder (2018) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2018 · 124 min · Japanese
Echo score 75
JustWatch #1,481 27
Directed by
Hirokazu Koreeda
Starring
Masaharu Fukuyama, Kôji Yakusho, Suzu Hirose, Shin'nosuke Mitsushima, Izumi Matsuoka, Aju Makita

A brilliant lawyer, Shigemori, takes on the defense of Misumi, a man who readily admits to murder. Initially believing the case straightforward, Shigemori soon finds his certainty shaken as unsettling details emerge. As he investigates, the line between guilt and innocence blurs, and he questions everything he thought he knew. The pursuit of justice becomes a complex and unsettling journey, leaving the outcome uncertain and the truth elusive.

On this page (5)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Every angle

Where to watch

Where to Watch The Third Murder (2018)

Where can you watch The Third Murder? Stream, rent or buy it in the US, including on Film Movement Plus, Hoopla and Kanopy: current JustWatch availability with up-to-date prices.

Streaming availability powered by JustWatch

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in The Third Murder: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of The Third Murder (2018) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

As the clock struck 12:30 am on October 11, 2017, a horrifying scene played out alongside the banks of the Tama River. A man's charred remains lay in the shadows, the result of a vicious assault followed by a ruthless incineration. This dreadful incident would soon unravel into a complex and deeply unsettling murder investigation.

In the midst of this turmoil was Shigemori, a seasoned criminal defense attorney, accompanied by his loyal assistant Kawashima. Their journey commenced at the Yokohama Detention Center, where they met Misumi, the man accused of robbery and murder. Misumi's past was ominous—he bore a previous conviction from 30 years ago when Shigemori's own father served as the presiding judge. This judgment had spared Misumi from the death penalty, only to see him recently released.

As they dug deeper into the case, Shigemori and Kawashima encountered a labyrinth of deceptions and contradictions in Misumi's explanations. He asserted that he had killed the former owner of a food factory in Kawasaki to settle debts, claiming influence from substances during the act. Yet, his prior attorney Settsu provided evidence indicating that Misumi had premeditated the crime long before that fateful night.

The discrepancies in Misumi's recounting unraveled as quickly as they were formed. He spoke of returning to the factory to retrieve gasoline post-murder, even injuring his hand in the process. Amid reviewing the intricate details, Shigemori’s team saw a chance to mitigate the charges against him.

But as the investigation advanced, they stumbled upon a perplexing cross left at the crime scene, a potential signpost leading them to a teenage girl who walked with a pronounced limp. This clue piqued their interest about possible motivations and underlying connections. Further scrutiny of surveillance footage and the victim’s wallet revealed something astonishing—Misumi had stolen money after the murder, forcing Shigemori to reassess his client’s intentions, effectively challenging any arguments of theft.

A somber visit to the victim's family, bearing a letter from Misumi, brought Shigemori into the emotional storm raging within the victim's teenage daughter, whose limp mirrored the symbol left at the crime scene. Without forgiveness from the victim's wife, the atmosphere was thick with grief. Meanwhile, Kawashima's inquiries at the factory exposed strains between Misumi and his former employer regarding unpaid wages, prompting Shigemori to rethink their defense strategy, possibly pivoting the narrative towards revenge due to being wrongfully terminated.

With the case continuing to evolve, Shigemori found himself facing a moral quandary, entangled between justice and compassion. As they approached Misumi's home again, he presented a magazine article that curiously reflected their own case—a tale of a woman who conspired to murder her husband for insurance money. The legal team speculated that Misumi was hired by the victim's wife, only for Misumi to shockingly affirm that the wife had reached out to him two weeks before the incident, promising security should he remain silent about her involvement.

In the backdrop of their investigation, Shigemori's father cautioned him against wasting time trying to decipher Misumi's motivations, advising him to focus on constructing a solid legal defense. Yet, Shigemori sensed there was more at play. In search of clarity, he traveled to Rumoi, Misumi's hometown, where memories intertwined with feelings of nostalgia emerged as he reflected on a postcard sent to his father by Misumi.

In Rumoi, encounters with the arresting officer shed light on the deeper layers of Misumi’s past crimes, questioning whether a potential coercion by his attorney had tainted the true nature of his confessions. At a local bar, inquiries about Misumi's attempts to contact his estranged daughter Megumi led to a chilling revelation: Megumi wanted nothing to do with her father and was poised to testify against him.

Returning to Yokohama, Shigemori shared insights with Sakie, hinting at Misumi’s possible affection for her due to their shared experiences linked to Megumi's disability. However, the discussion turned hostile when Shigemori suggested a hidden relationship between her and Misumi.

As the pivotal trial approached, Shigemori sought to delve into Misumi’s psyche, specifically regarding his alleged intentions with the wallet. Misumi agreed to deny any theft but astutely reframed the conversation, questioning the sincerity behind Shigemori’s legal tactics versus genuine beliefs in his narrative.

A profound turning point occurred when Sakie, the victim's wife, took the stand. Her assertion that the 500,000 yen was not for greed but tied to her family's business dealings disrupted the defense's carefully laid groundwork. A tense confrontation with Sakie unveiled her traumatic history of abuse at the hands of her father, which she unmasked to Misumi, as Shigemori witnessed vivid dreamlike sequences connecting him with both Sakie and Misumi during the horrific act.

With the foundations of his defense collapsing, Misumi revised his story, asserting his innocence and claiming that the money was for illegal business transactions. Settsu advised him to plead guilty to evade execution, as Misumi recounted sending the stolen money to Megumi after suffering burns from a bonfire mishap. Faced with these new developments, Shigemori reluctantly accepted Misumi's altered account.

In the final moments before the trial resumed, Shigemori confronted Sakie one last time, pleading with her not to condemn Misumi to death. Yet, when the court reconvened, Sakie expressed disbelief that Misumi killed her father for money, wanting mercy instead of retribution. Reluctantly, Misumi claimed coercion from both the prosecution and his own counsel in confessing guilt despite his protestations of innocence. The courtroom found itself on the edge of a precipice, echoing the complexities of morality and truth.

Ultimately, the judge delivered a verdict favoring the prosecution, sentencing Misumi to death. After the trial concluded, Shigemori approached Sakie once more, where she reiterated Misumi's confounding notion that truth is subjective.

As Shigemori returned to Misumi's modest home, he pondered over the reasons driving Misumi’s guilt—whether it was an act to shield Sakie from facing her own scars. In turn, Misumi showcased inklings of self-awareness about his existence, suggesting that even he, with his flaws, could have a positive influence on others. This conversation ignited a barrage of emotions in Shigemori, who found the scales of hope and despair precariously balanced.

As he stepped outside, pausing at an intersection, Shigemori gazed upward, encapsulated in a moment of reflection. The stillness belied the inner chaos as he grappled with the intricate nature of humanity and the fragile connections woven between them all.

Last updated: November 22, 2024 at 18:52

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

The Third Murder Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about The Third Murder (2018): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why did Misumi keep changing his story about the murder?

Misumi gave three contradictory confessions throughout the trial. Initially he claimed he killed for debt-related revenge, then admitted to premeditation, and finally declared innocence, stating the money was for illegal business transactions. This pattern suggests Misumi was either trying to protect someone (possibly Sakie), manipulate the legal outcome, or was coerced by his attorneys. The defense attorney Settsu even advised him to plead guilty to avoid the death penalty, indicating the confusing confessions served strategic purposes rather than revealing clear truth.

Foreshadowing: Earlier scenes show Misumi sending money to his estranged daughter Megumi, hinting at a protective motivation beyond self-interest.

  • misumi confession
  • changing story
  • murder trial
  • conflicting statements
Q2

What was Sakie's actual involvement in her father's murder?

Sakie, the victim's wife, initially appeared as a grieving widow but her testimony revealed deeper involvement. She admitted reaching out to Misumi two weeks before the murder, promising him security should he remain silent about her involvement. During her testimony, she revealed she was motivated by years of abuse from her father, suggesting she may have orchestrated or encouraged Misumi to kill him. However, at the final hearing, she expressed disbelief that Misumi killed for money and asked for mercy rather than retribution.

Foreshadowing: The mysterious cross left at the crime scene mirrored Sakie's daughter's limp, creating an early visual clue connecting the family to the murder.

  • sakie victim wife
  • murder involvement
  • abuse history
  • conspiracy
Q3

Why did Shigemori's father spare Misumi 30 years ago?

Shigemori's father was the presiding judge in Misumi's earlier murder case 30 years ago. Rather than sentencing him to death, the judge spared Misumi's life, allowing him to be released after serving his sentence. This historical connection creates personal stakes for Shigemori, as defending Misumi forces him to confront his father's past decision. The film suggests this earlier judgment may have been too lenient, leading to the second murder.

Foreshadowing: The film hints that Misumi sent a postcard to Shigemori's father, suggesting an ongoing connection between them that influenced the current case.

  • shigemori father
  • judge
  • death penalty
  • 30 years ago
  • previous case
Q4

What was the significance of the cross and limp found at the crime scene?

The cross left at the crime scene was a mysterious clue that led investigators to the victim's teenage daughter, who walked with a pronounced limp. This detail connected the crime scene to the victim's family and suggested the killer had some relationship or knowledge of the family. The symbol also foreshadowed the complex family dynamics involving abuse and trauma within the household.

Foreshadowing: When Shigemori visits the victim's family, he meets the daughter whose limp directly mirrors the symbol left at the crime scene, confirming the connection.

  • crime scene clue
  • cross
  • limp
  • evidence
  • investigation
Q5

Why did Misumi send money to his daughter Megumi?

Misumi sent the stolen 500,000 yen to his estranged daughter Megumi after the murder, claiming it was to help her despite their fractured relationship. This act reveals a complex side to Misumi, he is a murderer but also a father trying to provide for his child from whom he is estranged. Megumi, however, wanted nothing to do with him and was prepared to testify against him in court, making his gesture largely futile.

Foreshadowing: In Rumoi, Shigemori learns that Megumi refused to contact her father, setting up the tragic irony of Misumi's attempted reconciliation through crime.

  • megumi daughter
  • money transfer
  • estranged relationship
  • family
Q6

What was Misumi's real motivation for killing the factory owner?

Misumi initially claimed the murder was motivated by unpaid wages and revenge against his former employer. However, the truth became murky as his confessions shifted. Evidence suggested Sakie (the victim's wife) may have hired him, and her testimony about her father's abuse hinted at a darker family conflict. Misumi's claim that he acted under the influence was contradicted by his attorney's evidence of premeditation, making his true motivation ambiguous throughout.

Foreshadowing: The investigation reveals tensions at the factory over unpaid wages, but Sakie's involvement suggests the murder was more complex than simple workplace revenge.

  • motivation
  • revenge
  • unpaid wages
  • hiring killer
  • factory owner
Q7

Did Misumi actually steal money from the victim after the murder?

Surveillance footage confirmed that Misumi did steal money from the victim's wallet after the murder. This discovery forced Shigemori to reassess his defense strategy, as it contradicted claims that theft was not a motive. However, Misumi later changed his story again, asserting the money was for illegal business transactions rather than personal gain, creating further ambiguity about his true intentions.

Foreshadowing: This discovery came during Shigemori's investigation, causing him to question everything he thought he knew about his client.

  • theft
  • stolen money
  • wallet
  • surveillance footage
  • robbery
Q8

Why was Misumi sentenced to death if he claimed innocence?

Despite Misumi's final claim of innocence, the court found him guilty and sentenced him to death. The prosecution presented evidence of premeditation, the stolen money, and his inconsistent confessions which undermined his credibility. Even when Misumi claimed coercion from both prosecution and his own counsel, the judge sided with the prosecution. The verdict reflects the court's distrust of his shifting stories rather than definitive proof of his guilt for the specific charges.

Foreshadowing: Settsu warned Misumi that pleading guilty might be safer than claiming innocence, foreshadowing the deadly outcome of his inconsistent defense.

  • death sentence
  • verdict
  • execution
  • guilty verdict
  • courtroom
Q9

What did Sakie mean when she said truth is subjective?

Sakie's final statement that "truth is subjective" encapsulates the film's central theme. Throughout the trial, multiple versions of events emerged, Misumi confessed, then recanted, then claimed innocence. Sakie herself hid her involvement while presenting herself as a grieving widow. The ambiguous ending suggests there may never be one definitive truth about what happened, leaving the nature of justice itself in question.

Foreshadowing: The entire film builds toward this ambiguity, with each character's conflicting accounts making the concept of objective truth increasingly elusive.

  • truth
  • subjective
  • ambiguous ending
  • meaning
  • theme
  • philosophy
Q10

How is Sakie connected to Misumi through Megumi's disability?

Shigemori hypothesizes that Misumi may have felt affection for Sakie because they both shared a connection to Megumi's disability, Sakie's stepdaughter walked with a limp similar to what Misumi's own daughter experienced. This theory suggests Misumi's willingness to protect Sakie or take blame may stem from empathy toward her situation as a caregiver. However, Sakie rejected this suggestion when confronted by Shigemori, and the true nature of their relationship remains unclear.

Foreshadowing: This connection emerges during Shigemori's conversations with Sakie, where he probes the hidden relationships between the defendants.

  • sakie misumi connection
  • disability
  • megumi
  • empathy
  • relationship

Movie threads

More Movies Like The Third Murder, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes The Third Murder tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Legal Dramas with Moral Ambiguity like The Third Murder

Stories where the pursuit of truth leads only to deeper ambiguity and moral doubt. Explore movies like The Third Murder that challenge the concept of objective truth within legal and ethical frameworks. If you enjoyed the philosophical uncertainty and complex character motivations, you'll find similar thought-provoking stories here that leave clear-cut answers behind.

  • ambiguous
  • philosophical
  • unsettling
  • thought-provoking
  • morally complex
  • uncertain
  • Tone: dark, intellectually unsettling
  • Pacing: slow, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Narratives in this thread typically follow a protagonist, often an investigator or lawyer, who begins with a clear goal but has their convictions systematically dismantled. The plot unfolds through shifting perspectives, unreliable testimony, and hidden histories, ultimately concluding without a definitive resolution, forcing the audience to sit with the discomfort of ambiguity.

Why they belong together: These films are grouped by their shared focus on epistemological uncertainty. They prioritize psychological tension over action, feature morally complex characters, and deliver an experience defined by intellectual and ethical unease rather than plot-driven closure.

Slow Burn Psychological Dramas like The Third Murder

A creeping, atmospheric unease that builds quietly into profound existential tension. Discover films with a similar slow burn pacing and heavy, unsettling atmosphere as The Third Murder. If you appreciated its methodical build-up of dread and the somber, introspective mood, this selection offers more movies that prioritize psychological tension over fast-paced plots.

  • slow burn
  • unsettling
  • claustrophobic
  • somber
  • melancholic
  • psychological
  • Tone: somber, claustrophobic, melancholic
  • Pacing: slow, deliberate, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The journey is inward, focusing on a character's psychological unraveling as they confront an unsettling reality. The plot moves deliberately, often through long, tense conversations and meticulous observation, creating a suffocating atmosphere where the real horror is the erosion of certainty and the weight of unanswerable questions.

Why they belong together: What binds these films is their shared mood and pacing: a SLOW, deliberate rhythm that fosters a DARK, SOMBER tone and a HIGH level of psychological INTENSITY. They create a specific viewing experience defined by patience, unease, and a heavy emotional footprint.

Every angle

The Third Murder (2018) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about The Third Murder in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app