Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

It Was In May (1970) movie poster

Plot Summary

It Was In May (1970) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
1970 · 110 mins · Russian
Loading streaming availability…
Directed by
Marlen Khutsiyev
Starring
Sergey Shakurov, Vladimir Gostyukhin, Viktor Lazarev, Viktor Uralsky, Eugenija Pleskyte, Pyotr Todorovskiy

Days after Germany’s unconditional surrender, a detachment of Soviet soldiers is assigned to a seemingly untouched farmyard. The quiet rural setting masks a chilling reality, and the Red Army troops soon uncover the full horror of Nazi terror hidden within, confronting the brutal legacy of the war.

On this page (5)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Every angle
Loading streaming availability…

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in It Was In May: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of It Was In May (1970) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

In the immediate aftermath of May 1945, a small detachment of Soviet reconnaissance troops takes up temporary residence on the farm of Rashke, a well-off German pig farmer who lives there with his much younger wife and teenage son. The man appears outwardly cordial, even deferential toward their group and their leader, Lieutenant Nikolaev, yet Rashke and his family quietly slip away each night to sleep somewhere else, creating a lingering sense of unease around the farm’s quiet regularity.

One day, a mishap on the road leads Nikolaev to crash his motorcycle near a nearby town. He is helped by fellow soldiers who are stationed in an abandoned mansion nearby. As the men spend the day together, they share memories from the war, debate what life might look like after victory, and consider the strange efficiency of the German farms surrounding them. The mood blends camaraderie with a growing edge of weariness, as if the war’s shadows have seeped into their conversations as thoroughly as into the soil.

That night, a walk through a deserted landscape brings the group to a long-forgotten concentration camp. They enter a space characterized by silent barracks and dark corridors, filled with the remnants and echoes of people long gone. In a room with unusually thick walls, enormous furnaces, and ceiling vents, they imagine the room once used as a boiler, a memory that unsettles them and makes the night feel heavier with history.

The next day, back at Rashke’s farm, a tense moment erupts when Rashke’s son accuses one of the soldiers of killing a pig. The other soldiers react with anger, revealing that the accused man is a survivor from a village that Rashke’s family had burned in the past. Nikolaev intervenes, trying to restore calm and control the situation, underscoring the fragile lines between past crimes, present loyalties, and the chain of command.

As evening settles, Rashke and his family depart again, and three emaciated former camp prisoners appear before the house. The first is Stefan, a Polish man, who recounts how his wife Katarzyna was forced to work for Rashke until exhaustion and hunger drove her to madness, after which Rashke sent her to the camp where she was executed. Stefan’s vivid memories include the gas chambers and the crematorium where countless women and children perished, their ashes scattered over the nearby fields as if they were fertilizer.

The second former prisoner is a German engineer who speaks Russian and speaks bitterly about the betrayal of ordinary Germans by their own country. He recounts how his wife received a bill for the state’s expenses tied to the execution of her brother, a communist, adding a cold, bureaucratic sting to the human tragedy. The third prisoner, also German, haunted by memories of guard dogs, mutters in his native tongue, a grim reminder of the fear and control that marked the era.

The encounter leaves the soldiers shaken. They attempt to seize Rashke, but he vanishes into the night, leaving them to face the war’s lingering horrors on their own terms. The film frames this confrontation with a stark tonal arc: it opens with wartime newsreel footage and closes on peaceful postwar city scenes, underscored by Sonny Bono’s song “Mama” arranged by Paul Mauriat. The musical contrast heightens the sorrow and restraint of the story, emphasizing the gulf between the era’s brutal memories and the fragile calm that follows.

Throughout, the narrative probes memory, guilt, and the long echoes of violence that persist even after the fighting ends. The setting—a German farm that hosts a fragile semblance of hospitality, a distant camp that once housed terror, and a postwar world that struggles to reconcile with it all—forms a quiet meditation on how ordinary life resumes amid the shadows of past crimes. The result is a somber, meditative look at the cost of war and the uneasy process of moving forward.

Last updated: October 09, 2025 at 12:29

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

It Was In May Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about It Was In May (1970): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why does Rashke's family leave the house every night?

Rashke's family sleeps elsewhere each night because they are hiding something. While Rashke maintains a cordial, deferential facade with the Soviet soldiers, his wife and teenage son slip away to sleep in a different home each night. This mysterious behavior foreshadows the dark secrets they are concealing, specifically their involvement with the nearby concentration camp and the atrocities committed there.

Foreshadowing: The family departures hint at deeper guilt and fear that eventually connects to the three emaciated prisoners who arrive at the farm.

  • rashke family
  • nighttime
  • secret
  • soviet soldiers
  • farm
Q2

What was the thick-walled room the soldiers found in the camp?

The thick-walled room with large furnaces and ceiling vents was speculated by the soldiers to have been a boiler room, but its true purpose was far more sinister. Based on the survivors' later testimony about gas chambers and crematoriums, this room was almost certainly part of the execution and disposal process at the camp where countless prisoners were killed and their bodies burned.

Foreshadowing: The soldiers' speculation about the room remains unsettling until the prisoners arrive and confirm the camp's true horror.

  • concentration camp
  • thick-walled room
  • furnaces
  • gas chambers
  • crematorium
Q3

Why does the pig incident cause such tension between the soldiers?

The pig incident erupts because one of the soldiers is accused of killing a pig, triggering intense anger from his comrades. The situation escalates further when it emerges that the accused soldier is a survivor of a village that Rashke's family had burned during the war. Nikolaev must intervene to prevent violence, revealing how the war's traumas simmer just beneath the surface and how easily past atrocities can resurface among the occupiers themselves.

Foreshadowing: This incident reveals the interconnected web of violence that ties the soldiers to the very land they now occupy.

  • pig
  • tension
  • village burning
  • survivor
  • nikolaev
Q4

What happened to Katarzyna at Rashke's farm?

Katarzyna was a Polish woman forced to work for Rashke on his farm until exhaustion and hunger drove her to madness. When she could no longer work, Rashke sent her to the concentration camp where she was executed. Her husband Stefan, one of the three surviving prisoners, recounts how she perished in the gas chambers and was cremated, with her ashes scattered over the nearby fields, used as if they were fertilizer.

Foreshadowing: Stefan's testimony provides the crucial link between the peaceful farm setting and the horror of the camp it served.

  • katarzyna
  • stefan
  • rashke
  • camp execution
  • gas chamber
  • ashes
Q5

Why did Rashke send Katarzyna to the camp?

Rashke sent Katarzyna to the camp because she had become useless to him after exhaustion and hunger drove her to madness. The film portrays Rashke as a pragmatic participant in the Nazi terror machine, he used forced labor from the camp and disposed of workers when they could no longer serve his economic interests, revealing the cold, utilitarian complicity of ordinary civilians in wartime atrocities.

Foreshadowing: Rashke's nightly absences and the family's secretiveness about sleeping elsewhere hint at his direct involvement with camp operations.

  • rashke motivation
  • forced labor
  • camp
  • disposa
  • complicity
Q6

What do the three former prisoners represent?

The three emaciated prisoners represent different perspectives on the Holocaust and German wartime guilt. Stefan, a Polish man, provides the most direct testimony linking Rashke to the camp and describing Katarzyna's fate. The German engineer prisoner speaks Russian and recounts the bureaucratic betrayal of ordinary Germans, including receiving a bill for his brother's execution. The third German prisoner, haunted by memories of guard dogs, represents the trauma and fear that persisted among victims. Together they embody the multi-faceted horror and complicity of the era.

Foreshadowing: Their arrival as Rashke departs creates a direct confrontation between the perpetrator's family leaving and the survivors arriving to bear witness.

  • three prisoners
  • stefan
  • german engineer
  • perspectives
  • testimony
  • witness
Q7

Why does Rashke disappear and where does he go?

Rashke vanishes into the night when the Soviet soldiers attempt to capture him after hearing the prisoners' testimony. His escape highlights how accountable figures often slip away after regime collapse, leaving victims without justice. The film does not reveal where he goes, this ambiguity itself becomes part of the film's meditation on guilt, memory, and the elusive nature of accountability after the war.

Foreshadowing: The earlier detail of his family sleeping elsewhere each night suggests Rashke had escape routes and safe places already prepared.

  • rashke escape
  • vanished
  • accountability
  • nighttime
  • justice
Q8

What does the film's ending signify with its peaceful city scenes?

The film closes with peaceful postwar city scenes accompanied by Sonny Bono's song "Mama" arranged by Paul Mauriat, creating a stark contrast to the grim testimony and horror revealed earlier. This juxtaposition emphasizes the gulf between ordinary life resuming and the persistent trauma of memory. The gentle, melancholic music underscores that while the fighting has ended, the emotional and moral reckoning with the past continues quietly, much like the ashes scattered over the fields.

Foreshadowing: The opening wartime newsreel footage establishes this frame of memory versus present reality that the closing scenes complete.

  • ending
  • peaceful scenes
  • music
  • mama
  • memory
  • contrast
  • aftermath
Q9

Why does the film open with wartime newsreel footage?

The film opens with wartime newsreel footage to frame the story within the collective memory of the war's end, establishing that this is not merely a personal drama but a historical reckoning. This prologue primes the audience for the moral questions to come and creates a documentary-like gravity before the narrative unfolds. It positions the personal testimonies that follow within the broader context of historical trauma.

Foreshadowing: The newsreel style contrasts sharply with the intimate, meditative closing scenes, creating the film's emotional arc from historical record to personal memory.

  • newsreel
  • opening
  • historical context
  • memory
  • framing
Q10

Why are Soviet soldiers stationed at Rashke's farm?

Soviet reconnaissance troops are assigned to occupy Rashke's farm as part of the immediate postwar occupation of Germany in May 1945, days after Germany's unconditional surrender. The soldiers take up temporary residence in what appears to be an untouched rural setting, unaware of the dark secrets hidden there. Their presence creates the scenario for discovering the concentration camp and confronting the reality of Nazi terror that exists even in seemingly peaceful countryside locations.

Foreshadowing: The soldiers' search of the surrounding area leads them to the abandoned concentration camp, making their occupation the catalyst for uncovering the truth.

  • soviet troops
  • occupation
  • may 1945
  • farm
  • reconnaissance
  • surrender

Movie threads

More Movies Like It Was In May, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes It Was In May tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Movies about the aftermath of war like It Was In May

Stories that explore the heavy silence and moral debris left in the wake of conflict. If you were moved by the contemplative and heavy atmosphere of It Was In May, this thread gathers similar films that explore the post-war period. These movies focus on the lingering trauma, moral reckoning, and quiet struggles of survival after the fighting has ended, offering a sobering look at the true cost of conflict.

  • somber
  • reflective
  • grim
  • haunting
  • historical
  • oppressive
  • Tone: melancholic, somber, reflective
  • Pacing: slow, deliberate, atmospheric
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Narratives in this thread typically follow characters—soldiers, civilians, or communities—as they navigate a world shattered by war. The central conflict is often internal or social, revolving around processing trauma, uncovering hidden atrocities, and facing the moral ambiguity of survival. The plot is driven by discovery and reflection rather than external action.

Why they belong together: These films are grouped together because they share a specific setting and thematic focus. They prioritize a melancholic tone, slow pacing, and high emotional weight to convey the oppressive silence and unresolved pain that defines the post-war experience, creating a cohesive vibe of somber historical reflection.

Movies about uncovering dark truths like It Was In May

A slow, grim discovery of historical crimes that forces a moral confrontation. For viewers who appreciated the chilling discovery narrative in It Was In May, this collection features films with a similar pattern. These stories involve a slow, deliberate investigation that leads to the uncovering of horrific events, forcing characters and the audience to confront deeply disturbing truths about history and human nature.

  • uneasy
  • grim
  • haunting
  • somber
  • psychological
  • disturbing
  • Tone: grim, unsettling, melancholic
  • Pacing: slow burn, deliberate
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern follows a journey of investigation or accidental discovery. Characters, often outsiders or newcomers, piece together clues in a subdued environment, leading to a climax that reveals the full scale of a hidden horror. The emotional journey is one of increasing unease shifting to profound shock and sorrow.

Why they belong together: These movies are linked by a specific plot mechanism and emotional arc. They share a slow-burn structure that builds tension through atmosphere rather than action, leading to a devastating reveal. The combination of high tension, high sadness, and a melancholic, bittersweet tone creates a powerfully coherent and unsettling viewing experience.

Every angle

It Was In May (1970) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about It Was In May in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app