Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

Heart of a Dog (2024) movie poster

Timeline

Heart of a Dog (2024) Timeline Explained – Every Event in Order

Release, runtime and language
2024 · 16 mins · Hungarian
Directed by
Luca Hidegkuti Kardos
Starring
Lili Walters, Orsolya Bukovszky
Budget
$500

Two friends go on a hike after a long time of not seeing each other.

On this page (4)
  1. 1 Events in order (14)
  2. 2 Timeline questions answered
  3. 3 Movie threads
  4. 4 Every angle

14 events in order · contains spoilers

Heart of a Dog Timeline: Events in Chronological Order

Every key event of Heart of a Dog (2024) in order, scene by scene, with when and where it takes place. Use it to untangle flashbacks, time jumps and parallel storylines, to refresh your memory before the sequel or to find the exact scene you are thinking of.

  1. Sharik is found and rescued in Moscow

    In Moscow during the winter of 1924, a stray dog is foraging through trash and is scalded with boiling water by a cook. A renowned surgeon, Filipp Filippovich Preobrazhensky, arrives and offers the dog a piece of sausage. The grateful animal follows him back to his flat, where he is named Sharik.

    When
    Winter 1924
    Where
    Moscow, Russia
  2. Sharik joins the professor's household

    Sharik settles into the professor’s flat and meets Bormenthal and the two female servants, Bunina and Ivanova. Despite the professor's anti-communist views, his treatment of Bolshevik leadership keeps him untouchable on the housing committee. Sharik quickly adapts to life as a pampered gentleman’s dog in a busy Moscow household.

    When
    Days after arrival
    Where
    Preobrazhensky's flat, Moscow
  3. The plan revealed and confinement

    After a few days, the professor reveals his true intention to use Sharik in a radical medical experiment. He locks Sharik in the bathroom as preparations for the operation begin. The dog senses the looming transformation as the lab is readied.

    When
    A few days after arrival
    Where
    Flat, Moscow (bathroom then lab)
  4. The operation

    In the laboratory, Filipp Preobrazhensky trepans Sharik’s skull and implants a human pituitary gland. His torso is opened for grafting human testicles taken from Klim Grigoryevich Chugunkin. The procedure is perilous and only adrenaline injections prevent the dog from dying on the table.

    When
    During the operation
    Where
    Preobrazhensky’s lab, Moscow
  5. Sharik becomes a man-like Sharikov

    Weeks after the operation, Sharik begins transforming into an unkempt, rudimentary human, and is issued papers under the name Poligraf Poligrafovich Sharikov. He chooses the publishing-related name, while the calendar-based preference is ignored. The narrative shifts to Bormenthal’s case notes, chronicling the astonishing change.

    When
    Weeks after operation
    Where
    Flat / lab, Moscow
  6. Sharikov rejects etiquette

    Sharikov resists learned etiquette and mocks manners as relics of Tsarism, insisting that it is better to behave naturally. He refuses to shave, dresses in unwashed clothes, and eats like a slob. The professor and Bormenthal watch as their experiment unsettles the household.

    When
    Shortly after transformation
    Where
    Professor Preobrazhensky's flat, Moscow
  7. Chaos erupts in the flat

    Sharikov’s presence escalates tensions when he turns on a bathroom spigot while chasing a cat, flooding the apartment. The locked door traps everyone inside as the water pours in. The domestic order collapses under his unrestrained behavior.

    When
    Days after transformation
    Where
    Flat, Moscow
  8. Assault and exile

    Sharikov attempts to sexually assault one of the female servants, prompting Bormenthal to beat him and force apologies. Enraged, Sharikov leaves the apartment and disappears for several days.

    When
    After the flooding incident
    Where
    Flat, Moscow
  9. Debate over killing or undoing the experiment

    Bormenthal begs the professor for permission to dose and kill Sharikov with arsenic, but the professor insists on not slandering the dog. He explains that the human body parts used in the operation cause the defects, and wonders whether repeating the procedure with a genius would help the human race. He ultimately refuses to undo the operation or to allow murder.

    When
    Following the assault and exile
    Where
    Flat, Moscow
  10. Sharikov enters Soviet work life

    Sharikov begins working for the Soviet government, spending his days catching stray cats. He returns home with a female coworker, presenting her as his common-law wife. The odd domestic arrangement further unsettles the household.

    When
    Later in the story
    Where
    Flat, Moscow
  11. The coworker learns the truth

    The coworker is told that Sharikov is the product of a lab experiment rather than a heroic man from Siberia. She leaves the apartment in tears, horrified by the truth. The professor’s and Bormenthal’s attempts to manage Sharikov’s new life only deepen the tensions.

    When
    After the coworker’s arrival
    Where
    Flat, Moscow
  12. Denunciation reaches the Cheka

    The following day, Pyotr Alexandrovich, a senior party official and friend of the Professor, arrives to inform him that Sharikov has denounced Preobrazhensky to the Cheka. He notes that government distrust makes them relatively safe for now. When Sharikov returns to the flat, the professor and Bormenthal order him to leave for good.

    When
    The day after the coworker’s departure
    Where
    Flat, Moscow
  13. Police arrive and Sharikov reverts to dog

    With a search warrant, the police arrive alongside Schwonder and demand Sharikov. The professor proclaims the change as a natural phenomenon, while Bormenthal summons Sharikov. The creature returns to dog form as the police depart with their case unresolved.

    When
    That night
    Where
    Flat, Moscow
  14. Ending hint of ongoing experiments

    In the ending, Sharik hints that the professor plans to bring home a human brain and remove the pituitary gland again, implying a continuation of experimentation or lingering memories of his time as a human. The implication is that the project may resume or be repeated. The story closes with science and humanity still at odds.

    When
    Ending
    Where
    Flat, Moscow

Last updated: October 01, 2025 at 10:22

Was this helpful?

Timeline questions answered

Heart of a Dog Timeline Explained: Your Questions Answered

When does it happen, and why in that order? The questions people ask about the chronology of Heart of a Dog (2024): time jumps, flashbacks, cause and effect between scenes and the correct order of events, each answered with spoilers.

Q1

Why does Professor Preobrazhensky perform the organ transplant experiment on Sharik?

Preobrazhensky is a brilliant surgeon obsessed with the boundaries between animal and human. He believes that by transplanting human pituitary glands and testicles into a dog, he can create a new form of human life. The experiment reflects his scientific ambition to prove that human organs carry the essence of humanity, essentially testing whether a dog can develop human consciousness and behavior through biological material alone.

Foreshadowing: Earlier, the professor lives in a privileged seven-room flat protected by his valuable medical work for Bolshevik leaders, showing he uses his skills for personal gain while pursuing more radical interests.

  • preobrazhensky
  • experiment
  • sharik
  • organ transplant
  • science
  • motivation
Q2

What organs were transplanted into Sharik during the operation?

Professor Preobrazhensky transplanted two key human biological materials into Sharik: a human pituitary gland and human testicles. The pituitary gland was implanted directly into the dog's skull after trepanation, while the testicles were grafted into his torso. These organs came from Klim Grigorievich Chugunkin, a man killed in a brawl who served as the organ donor.

Foreshadowing: The professor reveals his true intention only after several days of observation, locking Sharik in the bathroom while preparing the laboratory for the procedure.

  • pituitary gland
  • testicles
  • chugunkin
  • transplant
  • operation
  • organs
Q3

Why does Sharikov become so violent, crude, and aggressive after the transformation?

The professor explains that the human body parts themselves carry defects and primitive instincts. Rather than gaining refined human qualities, Sharikov inherits the worst aspects of human nature, crudeness, aggression, and unchecked desire. The experiment produces not a cultured human but a crude, impulsive one who rejects all manners and social constraints, representing a dark commentary on human nature itself.

Foreshadowing: The operation uses organs from Chugunkin, a man with a troubled history killed in a brawl, suggesting the donor's violent nature influences the outcome.

  • sharikov
  • behavior
  • violence
  • crudeness
  • transformation
  • human nature
Q4

Why does Professor Preobrazhensky refuse to kill Sharikov even after he assaults a servant and causes chaos?

Preobrazhensky insists that killing Sharikov would 'slander the dog', meaning it would insult the value of the experimental life they created. He argues that the defects come from the human organs, not the original dog, and that the experiment must be allowed to run its course to prove whether education can reform even a misfit. His principle is that science must face the consequences of its creations rather than erase them, though this stance also reflects a cold detachment about human suffering.

Foreshadowing: Earlier, the professor treats Bolshevik leaders while holding anti-communist views, showing his willingness to work within a system he despises while pursuing his own agenda.

  • preobrazhensky
  • killing
  • ethics
  • experiment
  • murder
  • arsenic
Q5

What happens to Sharikov at the end of the movie? Does he transform back into a dog?

When police arrive with a warrant to retrieve Sharikov, the professor claims the creature has undergone a 'natural phenomenon' and transformed back into a dog. Sharik is seen returning to his canine form, and the police depart with Schwonder, leaving the case unresolved. However, the ending suggests this reversal may be an explanation to cover up the experiment rather than a true transformation, the professor and Bormenthal simply present Sharik as a normal dog to avoid further consequences.

Foreshadowing: The professor previously insists on facing the experiment's consequences rather than undoing them, yet here he allows a deceptive explanation to resolve the immediate crisis.

  • sharikov
  • transformation
  • dog
  • police
  • ending
  • reversal
Q6

Why does Sharikov denounce Professor Preobrazhensky to the Cheka?

Sharikov, now working for the Soviet government, uses his position to turn against the professor who created him. This betrayal reflects both his crude character and his desire to distance himself from his origins. By denouncing Preobrazhensky, Sharikov attempts to claim power within the Soviet system and reject the household that tried to civilize him, demonstrating that the experiment produced someone capable of betrayal rather than gratitude.

Foreshadowing: Sharikov previously mocked manners as relics of Tsarism and rejected all attempts at refinement, showing his alignment with revolutionary values over the professor's aristocratic lifestyle.

  • sharikov
  • denounce
  • cheka
  • betrayal
  • soviet
  • preobrazhensky
Q7

What do the final lines about the professor's future experiments mean?

The ending suggests Preobrazhensky intends to continue his dangerous work. Sharik hints that the professor plans to bring home a human brain and remove the pituitary gland again, implying either repeating the experiment with modifications or that Sharik retains disturbing memories of his time as a human. This ominous final note leaves the boundary between animal and human unresolved, suggesting science will continue its pursuit regardless of moral consequences.

Foreshadowing: The professor earlier wondered whether repeating the procedure with a genius instead of a troubled man like Chugunkin might improve humanity, showing his commitment to continuing the work.

  • ending
  • experiments
  • future
  • pituitary
  • brain
  • human
  • continuation
Q8

Why does Sharikov attempt to assault the female servant Zinaida?

Sharikov's attempt to force himself on Zinaida represents the unleashing of unchecked human desire without moral restraint. The professor's transplant of human testicles apparently transferred not just physical masculinity but also primitive sexual impulse without the corresponding social conditioning or respect for boundaries. Bormenthal beats Sharikov in response and forces apologies, but this incident marks the point where the household can no longer contain the creature's behavior.

Foreshadowing: Sharikov already spoke with crude bluntness in front of women, refused to shave, and ate like a slob, showing his progressive rejection of all social norms.

  • sharikov
  • assault
  • servant
  • zinaida
  • bormenthal
  • attack
Q9

What happens to Sharikov's female coworker after she learns the truth about him?

When Sharikov brings home a female coworker as his common-law wife, the professor and Bormenthal tell her the truth, that Sharikov is a dog who underwent a laboratory experiment, not a White Army veteran from Siberia. Horrified by this revelation, she leaves the apartment in tears. Sharikov responds with fury, vowing to have her fired, demonstrating his inability to form genuine human connections and his continued alignment with Soviet authority over personal relationships.

Foreshadowing: Sharikov had already proven indifferent to the feelings of others, treating people with the same crude dismissiveness he showed toward manners and etiquette.

  • coworker
  • sharikov
  • truth
  • leaves
  • siberia
  • marriage
Q10

Why does Professor Preobrazhensky treat Bolshevik leaders while holding anti-communist views?

Preobrazhensky uses his medical skills as protection against the Soviet system. By successfully treating Bolshevik leaders, he maintains immunity from housing committees and political persecution, allowing him to preserve his seven-room flat and aristocratic lifestyle. His anti-communist sentiments are well-known but tolerated because his surgical skills are irreplaceable. This contradiction shows how he manipulates the system he despises while pursuing his private scientific interests.

Foreshadowing: The professor explicitly voices blunt anti-communist sentiments but his treatment of Bolshevik leadership keeps him protected, a pattern that continues until Sharikov's denunciation threatens this arrangement.

  • preobrazhensky
  • bolsheviks
  • anti-communist
  • protection
  • soviet
  • doctor
Q11

Why does the operation produce a primitive, uncivilized human rather than an intelligent one?

The organs transplanted came from Klim Grigorievich Chugunkin, a man with a troubled history who was killed in a brawl, hardly an example of refined humanity. The professor later reflects that the donor's material carries the defects and primitive instincts of the donor himself. Rather than receiving cultured human qualities, Sharikov inherits the raw, unrefined aspects of masculinity and human desire, creating a being that represents humanity at its most basic and problematic rather than its elevated potential.

Foreshadowing: Chugunkin is described as having a 'troubled history' and being killed in a violent brawl, suggesting his organs carry violent and unstable traits.

  • chugunkin
  • primitive
  • donor
  • defects
  • operation
  • humanity
Q12

Why does Sharikov flood the apartment and trap everyone inside?

While chasing a cat through the bathroom, Sharikov turns on a faucet and becomes so absorbed in the chase that he ignores the flooding water. The apartment floods because he leaves the water running and the locked door traps everyone inside as water pours into the living spaces. This incident demonstrates Sharikov's complete disregard for property and his impulsive, chaotic nature that makes him dangerous even in mundane situations.

Foreshadowing: Earlier, Sharikov rejected all attempts to teach him discipline or consideration for others, insisting that natural behavior supersedes learned manners.

  • flooding
  • apartment
  • cat
  • bathroom
  • water
  • chaos
Q13

What is the significance of Sharikov's name Poligraf Poligrafovich?

Sharikov chooses 'Poligraf Poligrafovich' as his human name, selecting a name related to publishing and printing, 'poligraf' means polygraph or printing press in Russian. This choice reflects his desire to adopt a human identity and his grasping at Soviet-approved identities. The professor and Bormenthal had hoped he would choose a name based on the calendar (like the months), but Sharikov's preference for a publishing-related name shows his appropriation of Soviet bureaucracy and officialdom.

Foreshadowing: When Sharik receives papers as a human, he must choose a name that reflects his new identity within the Soviet system.

  • name
  • poligraf
  • sharikov
  • identity
  • printing
  • soviet

Movie threads

More Movies Like Heart of a Dog, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes Heart of a Dog tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Movies about unsettling experiments and moral rot like Heart of a Dog

Stories where a dark scientific or social experiment exposes the worst of humanity. If you liked the grim scientific ethics and social commentary in Heart of a Dog, explore more movies like it. This thread gathers films where disturbing experiments or morally questionable acts serve as a dark mirror to human nature, identity, and power dynamics, leaving the viewer deeply unsettled.

  • unsettling
  • scientific
  • moral conflict
  • grim
  • gothic
  • troubling
  • Tone: dark, grim, troubling
  • Pacing: steady, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Narratives in this thread typically follow a steady, consequential path. An initial act of scientific or ideological hubris sets off a chain of events that methodically explores the fallout. Characters are forced to confront the grotesque results of their actions, leading to escalating moral dilemmas, violence, and a deep questioning of what it means to be human.

Why they belong together: These films are grouped by their shared commitment to using a dark central concept as a vehicle for heavy social commentary. They share a bleak tone, a steady pacing that builds dread, and a focus on the psychological and ethical unraveling that occurs when boundaries are transgressed.

Slow-burn dramas with ambiguous endings like Heart of a Dog

Atmospheres of heavy tension that build to a lingering, uneasy conclusion. Fans of the methodical pacing and morally unsettling atmosphere of Heart of a Dog will find similar viewing experiences here. Discover movies that master a slow-burn approach to tension, leading to heavy emotional weight and endings that are ambiguous or bleak, focusing on grim themes and reflective moods.

  • slow burn
  • uneasy
  • grim
  • troubling
  • reflective
  • heavy
  • Tone: dark, reflective, tense
  • Pacing: steady, slow-burn
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern is one of gradual escalation. A problematic situation or relationship is established, and the film meticulously follows its consequences, focusing on character reactions and psychological strain over action. The climax is often intellectual or moral rather than purely physical, and the resolution refuses easy answers, emphasizing the lingering impact of the events.

Why they belong together: This grouping prioritizes a specific viewing rhythm and emotional payoff. The shared experience is defined by a steady pace that cultivates dread, a heavy emotional weight, and an ending that feels ambiguous or bleak, ensuring the story's troubling themes resonate long after the film ends.

Every angle

Heart of a Dog (2024) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about Heart of a Dog in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app