Enemies of the State

The film introduces Jiří Kajinek, considered the first hitman in post-communist Czech Republic, who is serving a life sentence in a high-security prison. His story is set against the backdrop of organized crime and corruption in the Czech legal system. The film sets the stage for exploring his complex personality and the criminal environment surrounding him.

Kajinek escapes from Mírov prison in 2000, becoming an instant legend and Europe's most wanted criminal. His daring escape sparks a massive manhunt that captures the public's and authorities' attention. This event marks a turning point in his criminal story and introduces the mystery surrounding his elusiveness.

Following Kajinek's escape, police efforts intensify to locate and apprehend him. His five-week period of elusion involves covert operations and public appeals. The story highlights the tension and chaos caused by his disappearance, emphasizing his status as an infamous fugitive.

A young lawyer becomes involved in Kajinek's case, driven by her pursuit of new evidence to prove his innocence. She is drawn to the case and Kajinek himself, despite the dangers, and begins unravelling the layers of corruption and conspiracy within the criminal underworld and state institutions.

The film explores two murders linked to Kajinek, which are central to his conviction and the controversy surrounding his case. The lawyer searches for evidence that could either implicate him or reveal a deeper conspiracy, questioning the integrity of the judicial process.

As the investigation progresses, evidence suggests infiltration of organized crime into the state administration. The movie reveals how political and criminal interests intertwine, complicating the pursuit of justice and raising doubts about Kajinek's innocence.

Kajinek, seeing betrayal and manipulation around him, begins to distrust everyone, including his lawyer. His paranoia grows as he suspects that powerful figures may have orchestrated his wrongful imprisonment or plan to eliminate him entirely.

The lawyer continues to seek new evidence despite the dangers, risking her safety to expose the truth behind Kajinek's case. Her pursuit reveals the dark underbelly of the criminal and political worlds, suggesting a possible conspiracy against Kajinek.

As new evidence comes to light, the film raises the possibility that Kajinek is either a victim of a conspiracy or a cold-blooded assassin. The story reaches its climax, leaving the audience to question whether justice is truly served or manipulated.

The film explores complex themes of truth, deception, and the corruptibility of justice. It emphasizes how political and criminal interests influence legal outcomes, and questions the innocence of Kajinek or his possible guilt.

The movie concludes with unresolved questions about Kajinek’s innocence and the extent of corruption. It reflects on the impact of Kajinek's story on public perception, shedding light on controversial issues that remain unresolved.