Cairo Conspiracy

Adam is a determined and resourceful young man, whose life takes a dramatic turn when he is accepted into Al-Azhar University. His journey of self-discovery and moral integrity leads him to navigate a world of political strife, ultimately confronting powerful players in the game of faith and loyalty. Despite the relentless pressures from external forces, his courage and resolve shine through.

Raed serves as Adam's initial friend and guide at Al-Azhar. With a friendly and open demeanor, he helps Adam adapt to the university's environment. However, their relationship becomes strained as political tensions rise, revealing the complexities of loyalty among friends in dangerous circumstances.

General Al Sakran is a calculating and influential figure within the NSA, determined to control the outcome of the Grand Imam election. His ruthless tactics and unwavering belief in the necessity of power foreshadow the darker elements of political machinations, as he manipulates events to maintain his grip on authority.

Colonel Ibrahim embodies the conflict between duty and morality, constantly challenging Adam's understanding of loyalty. His character represents the tension within the security apparatus, using Adam as a pawn while hiding his own agendas concerning Zizu's death.

Sheikh Negm is a wise and blind religious leader, whose insights and past decisions play a crucial role in the film's climax. His character challenges preconceived notions about power and morality, revealing the complexities of truth within a politically charged environment.

Zizu stands as a tragic figure caught between loyalty and survival, whose informant role deeply intertwines him with Adam's fate. His death catalyzes Adam's transformation and propels the narrative forward, shedding light on the perils of deception in a world riddled with conflict.

Soliman leads an extremist group, representing the radical elements affecting the political landscape. His character illustrates the dangers posed by extremism and the broader implications of faith manipulated for violent ends. Yet, he also serves as a reminder of the varied interpretations of belief within the framework.