The Man Who Sued God

Steve Myers Billy Connolly is a disillusioned lawyer who grows increasingly fed up with the corruption he perceives within the judicial system. He walks away from his career, buys a small fishing boat, and shifts to a quieter life at sea, hoping to find meaning and honesty in a different line of work.

His new livelihood is brutally upended when his fishing boat is struck by lightning, ripping it apart, burning, and sinking into the sea. He files a claim with his insurer, only to have it rejected on the grounds that the destruction was an act of God and therefore not liable. The denial fuels his frustration and a sense that powerful forces are bending rules behind the scenes.

Driven by a desire for accountability, he broadens his complaint into a radical legal move: he sues God itself, naming religious leaders across faiths as respondents along with their insurers. This audacious action sets off a courtroom showdown and turns the dispute into a national topic, attracting widespread media attention and stirring public debate about the rights of individuals against corporate policy language.

The case forces the court to confront a fundamental question: if God is the ultimate party, can divine responsibility be recognized or compensated within the legal system? The legal strategy, media glare, and the sheer novelty of the claim create a dynamic and dramatic atmosphere inside the courtroom, while the involved religious communities, their lawyers, and the insurance companies grapple with how to respond to an unprecedented challenge.

As the courtroom saga unfolds, Steve’s story captures the public imagination and catches the attention of a tenacious journalist who helps amplify his voice. Anna Redmond Judy Davis enters the scene, leveraging the media spotlight to rally support from others who feel similarly burned by insurance practices that invoke the acts of God clause. The publicity surge, however, draws fire from critics who accuse the coverage and the case of being built on sensationalism rather than solid legal grounds, complicating Steve’s personal life and his standing with his family.

The mounting attention places real strain on Steve’s relatives, who find themselves exposed to the spotlight and pressured by the evolving narrative. His ex-wife, already burdened by debt as the boat’s guarantor, faces new financial and emotional stress as the family weighs a move to Perth, away from the media glare and the tangles of the case.

Meanwhile, the public scrutiny also affects Anna, who becomes a lightning rod for controversy due to a history of disputes and attacks on insurance companies. Critics argue that her involvement is as much about publicity as about justice, casting doubt on the sincerity of the campaign.

Facing the prospect of a drawn-out legal battle and the personal cost it exacts on those closest to him, Steve reconsiders his position. He ultimately decides that he has achieved a moral victory, and withdraws from the case—but not before persuading the judge that the term acts of God used by insurers is misleading and oversimplified, a conclusion that reframes the controversy and leaves a lasting mark on how the system is perceived.

Last Updated: October 09, 2025 at 16:39