Salaakhen

The film opens with police sweeping the city in search of Vishal Agnihotri, suspected killer of four prominent personalities. Investigators chase leads, while the public debates his guilt and motive. The sense of danger and mystery sets the tone for the case that follows.

Vishal offers a deal to a renowned lawyer to secure his innocence in court for a hefty sum. The plan hinges on manipulating witnesses to present a false version of events. The tension builds as the legality of the arrangement hangs in the balance.

As the judge stands ready to deliver the decision, Vishal kills his lawyer and publicly accepts the guilt for the four deaths. The dramatic betrayal exposes the collapse of the supposed innocence ploy. Media and observers reel from the sensational twist.

News of the courtroom violence and the ambiguous confession sweeps the city, fueling sensational headlines. An inquiry committee is established to uncover the other side of Vishal's case. Public opinion becomes polarized between cries for justice and suspicions of political manipulation.

Vishal appears before the committee to recount his version of events, triggering the film's main flashback. The panel's questions push him to reveal a different sequence of what happened. The narrative then unfolds to expose deeper corruption and personal loyalties.

The flashback centers on Sachidanand Agnihotri, an honest schoolteacher in Kandivali who fights back against a corrupt system. He becomes embroiled in a high-stakes case involving a powerful family tied to the victim. His moral courage sets the film's moral compass against the backdrop of systemic abuse.

Sachidanand accuses Nagesh, son of the influential Jaspal Rana, of sexual assault and murder, triggering powerful adversaries to mobilize against him. Vishal's feelings for Neha blossom as the case unfolds, adding a personal stake to the upheaval. The tension between truth, loyalty, and desire complicates the narrative.

Nagesh is taken into custody as the investigation advances. A corrupt Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kamble, begins a relentless campaign to intimidate Sachidanand and pressure him during the testimony. The psychological assault reveals the personal cost of standing up to power.

On the day of the testimony, Nagesh's lawyer Ashok Pradhan confuses Sachidanand, driving him to a breaking point. Overwhelmed by the manipulation and intimidation, Sachidanand kills himself. The tragedy marks a pivotal turn in the case and the lives involved.

While jailed for assaulting police officers, Vishal stages a breakout, abducts Nagesh, and advances his personal vendetta. He murders Ashok Pradhan to eliminate a crucial link in the case against him. The line between right and wrong becomes increasingly blurred as revenge drives the actions.

Kamble arrives to rescue Nagesh, but Vishal ambushes them and eliminates both Kamble and Jaspal Rana. The assault marks a climactic turning point in the flashback and consolidates Vishal's narrative of retribution. The powerful families' grip on justice is exposed as thin veneer.

Back in the present, the court hands Vishal a sentence of four years to life imprisonment after he recounts his version of events. The judge's decision acknowledges the complexity of the case and the consequences of vigilantism. Vishal uses the moment to issue a warning about political figures like Jaspal Rana manipulating justice.

The narrative concludes with Vishal reflecting on accountability and the limits of the legal system. The events raise questions about power, corruption, and whether truth can survive within compromised institutions. The film invites viewers to consider what reforms are needed to prevent mob-justice from taking hold.