Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

In the Beginning There Was Light (2010) movie poster

Plot Summary

In the Beginning There Was Light (2010) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2010 · 90 mins · German
Loading streaming availability…
Directed by
P.A. Straubinger
Starring
Dean Radin, Jasmuheen, Wolfgang Marktl, Pater Josef Banz, Ruediger Dahlke, Dieter Hochegger

Is it possible to live on light alone? This documentary investigates the mysterious phenomenon of “Breatharianism”.

On this page (5)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Every angle
Loading streaming availability…

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in In the Beginning There Was Light: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of In the Beginning There Was Light (2010) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

P. A. Straubinger’s investigation begins with a television documentary about Nicholas of Flüe, a 15th‑century ascetic reputed to have lived for 19 years without eating. This striking claim sparks his curiosity and launches a broader inquiry that moves from the screen to the keyboard and, finally, into the field. Through the internet, he discovers a spectrum of individuals who say they nourish themselves on light, vitality, Prana, or Qi, and he becomes determined to meet them in person. His journey takes him across countries as he conducts interviews with practitioners who claim to exist beyond conventional food and drink, including Jasmuheen and Mataji Prahlad Jani. He also documents encounters with Michael Werner, whose background as a pharmaceutical operations manager adds a layer of scrutiny to the discussion about how breatharian claims intersect with modern science and medicine. Through these conversations, Straubinger walks a careful line between open curiosity and the concerns raised by scientific norms, wondering whether the materialistic worldview of contemporary science can fully account for phenomena that some people describe as nourishment from non-traditional sources.

Along the way, Straubinger consults a range of experts from both traditional and alternative medical perspectives, seeking frameworks that could explain inedia without immediately dismissing the claims as mere illusion. He engages with voices from the fields of nutrition and fasting, including [Ruediger Dahlke], who is presented as a fasting doctor, and [Ingrid Kiefer], a nutrition physician. Their viewpoints provide contrast to the more sensational accounts, offering medical language and criteria that would be used to evaluate breatharian practices in controlled settings. The documentary also threads in perspectives from researchers with a different kind of authority, including scientists like [Dean Radin], who appears as a consciousness researcher, and other figures such as [Wolfgang Marktl], a nutrition physiologist, contributing a more grounded, biomedical frame to the discussion. Through these interludes, the film probes whether the phenomenon can be reconciled with current science or whether it exposes gaps in how we understand metabolism, energy, and the body's needs.

Yet Straubinger’s stance often leans toward credulity, even as the body of available evidence points in conflicting directions. The film notes that some breatharians have submitted themselves to medical observation and testing in clinical environments. In one noted case, [Mataji Prahlad Jani] appears to survive for an extended period without food or water under hospital observation, a claim that has drawn both interest and skepticism. Another instance involves an Israeli breatharian who reportedly lasted eight days without sustenance during a television documentary, a moment captured on film that fuels ongoing debate about the limits—or possible exceptions—to human physiology. The narrative does not downplay the dangers involved: in a number of documented cases, individuals attempting breatharian fasting have died, underscoring the inherent risks of misrepresenting human biology. The story also recounts attempts by some to live on sunlight alone, which reportedly culminate in severe weight loss and eventual withdrawal from the practice.

Throughout the documentary, the tension between extraordinary personal testimony and the apparatus of medical scrutiny remains central. Straubinger’s exploration is not merely about cataloging strange claims; it also interrogates how belief, observation, and measurement interact when faced with phenomena that resist easy explanation. The film presents a spectrum of experiences, from hopeful narratives of transformation to stark reminders of the ethical and biological hazards involved. In doing so, it invites viewers to consider the limits of scientific explanations while honoring the persistently personal nature of breatharian experiences. The result is a thoughtful, if contested, portrait of a modern search for alternative nourishment that sits at the crossroads of mysticism, physiology, and contemporary medicine.

Last updated: February 17, 2026 at 19:55

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

In the Beginning There Was Light Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about In the Beginning There Was Light (2010): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

What is breatharianism or inedia?

Breatharianism (also called inedia) is the belief that humans can survive without consuming food or water by obtaining nourishment from light, vitality, Prana, or Qi. The documentary follows P. A. Straubinger as he investigates this phenomenon, starting with the historical case of Nicholas of Flüe, a 15th-century Swiss ascetic said to have lived for 19 years without eating.

Foreshadowing: The film introduces the concept through a television documentary about Nicholas of Flüe, establishing that this idea has historical roots.

  • breatharianism
  • inedia
  • nicholas of flüe
  • light nourishment
  • prana
Q2

Why does the filmmaker seem to favor breatharian claims?

Straubinger approaches the subject with open curiosity and deliberately positions himself as interested in finding explanations that go beyond conventional science. He argues that the materialistic worldview of modern science may not fully account for phenomena described by breatharians. However, the documentary acknowledges that the evidence remains contested and incomplete, leaving the central question unresolved.

Foreshadowing: Early in the film, Straubinger's curiosity is sparked by a compelling television documentary, suggesting he began with a predisposition to find the claims credible.

  • straubinger
  • credulity
  • skepticism
  • documentary bias
Q3

What happened during Prahlad Jani's hospital observation?

Mataji Prahlad Jani submitted to medical observation in a hospital setting, where he reportedly survived for 15 days without food or water. The documentary presents this as evidence that breatharian claims warrant further investigation, though the observation remains controversial and has not been universally replicated or accepted by the scientific community.

Foreshadowing: The documentary frames Jani as one of the most compelling cases, setting up the hospital observation as a key moment of potential proof.

  • prahlad jani
  • hospital observation
  • medical testing
  • 15 days
Q4

Why did some breatharians die?

The documentary notes that in several documented cases, individuals attempting breatharian fasting have died. These tragedies underscore the dangers of attempting to survive without conventional nourishment. The film presents these deaths as stark reminders that breatharian practices can be fatal, highlighting the ethical and biological hazards involved in misrepresenting human biology.

Foreshadowing: The documentary includes these fatal cases alongside the more sensational survival claims, creating a tension between hope and danger.

  • death
  • dangers
  • health risks
  • breatharian fasting
Q5

What was the Israeli breatharian eight-day test on TV?

The film documents an Israeli breatharian who reportedly survived for eight days without food or water during a television documentary. This moment was captured on film and is used in the documentary to illustrate breatharian claims, though it remains subject to scrutiny and debate about whether genuine inedia occurred or whether other factors were involved.

Foreshadowing: This television test is presented as visual evidence, though the documentary acknowledges it remains open to further verification.

  • israeli breatharian
  • eight days
  • television test
  • documentary
Q6

Who is Jasmuheen and what does she claim?

Jasmuheen is a prominent proponent of breatharianism whom Straubinger interviews for the documentary. She represents one of the main voices advocating for the practice of obtaining nourishment from light, vitality, Prana, or Qi rather than conventional food. Her interview contributes to the film's exploration of breatharian philosophy and personal testimony.

Foreshadowing: Jasmuheen is introduced as a key practitioner, suggesting her testimony will be central to understanding breatharian claims.

  • jasmuheen
  • breatharian practitioner
  • interview
Q7

Who is Michael Werner and why is his background significant?

Michael Werner is interviewed in the documentary and claims to nourish himself without conventional food. His background as a pharmaceutical operations manager is significant because it adds a layer of scrutiny to the discussion, bridging the gap between breatharian claims and modern scientific/medical perspectives on nutrition and metabolism.

Foreshadowing: Werner's professional background suggests he brings a more analytical perspective to breatharian claims.

  • michael werner
  • pharmaceutical
  • background
  • interview
Q8

Why did sunlight-only experiments end in failure?

The documentary recounts attempts by some individuals to live on sunlight alone, which reportedly resulted in severe weight loss and eventual withdrawal from the practice. These cases demonstrate that attempts to survive purely on light without any food or water proved unsustainable, leading practitioners to abandon the effort after losing significant body weight.

Foreshadowing: The documentary presents these failures alongside the more sensational claims, suggesting a pattern of attempted but ultimately unsuccessful breatharian experiments.

  • sunlight only
  • weight loss
  • failed experiments
  • abandonment
Q9

What do medical and scientific experts say about breatharianism?

Straubinger consults various experts including Ruediger Dahlke (a fasting doctor), Ingrid Kiefer (a nutrition physician), Dean Radin (a consciousness researcher), and Wolfgang Marktl (a nutrition physiologist). Their perspectives provide medical frameworks and criteria used to evaluate breatharian claims in controlled settings, offering a biomedical counterpoint to the more sensational personal testimonies.

Foreshadowing: These expert consultations are woven throughout the documentary, providing ongoing scientific context for evaluating the claims.

  • medical experts
  • nutrition
  • science
  • dean radin
  • wolfgang marktl
Q10

Does the documentary prove breatharianism is real?

The documentary does not definitively prove breatharianism is possible. It presents a spectrum of experiences ranging from compelling personal testimonies to tragic deaths and failed experiments. Straubinger concludes that the available evidence falls short of proving inedia, though he maintains that science may not fully understand human nutrition and energy intake. The ending remains ambiguous, leaving the central question unresolved.

Foreshadowing: The documentary's final stance acknowledges the contested nature of the evidence, presenting neither a complete endorsement nor outright dismissal.

  • proof
  • evidence
  • conclusion
  • ambiguous ending
Q11

Why is Nicholas of Flüe important to the story?

Nicholas of Flüe is a 15th-century Swiss ascetic reputed to have lived for 19 years without eating. His story is what initially sparks Straubinger's investigation when he encounters it in a television documentary. As the historical anchor for the breatharian phenomenon, Nicholas of Flüe provides legitimacy to contemporary claims by suggesting such abilities have historical precedent.

Foreshadowing: The film opens with this story, establishing it as the catalyst for Straubinger's entire journey.

  • nicholas of flüe
  • historical ascetic
  • 15th century
  • 19 years

Movie threads

More Movies Like In the Beginning There Was Light, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes In the Beginning There Was Light tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Investigative Documentaries with Unanswered Mysteries like In the Beginning There Was Light

Documentaries that pose big questions without providing definitive answers. If you enjoyed the investigative journey of In the Beginning There Was Light, you'll appreciate these documentaries. This list gathers films that explore mysteries, leaving the central question thoughtfully unresolved, much like this film's look at breatharianism.

  • inquisitive
  • contemplative
  • skeptical
  • investigative
  • balanced
  • thought-provoking
  • Tone: neutral, skeptical, contemplative
  • Pacing: steady, linear
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Stories in this thread typically follow a linear investigative structure: an intriguing premise is introduced, multiple perspectives are examined, evidence is tested, and the film concludes by presenting the findings without a clear-cut resolution. The narrative is driven by curiosity rather than a need for a dramatic payoff.

Why they belong together: These films are grouped together because they share a commitment to balanced, skeptical inquiry. They prioritize presenting a clear-eyed view of a complex subject over forcing a specific conclusion, resulting in a contemplative viewing experience.

Contemplative Journeys into Human Extremes like In the Beginning There Was Light

Films that explore the outer limits of human belief and physical capability. Viewers fascinated by In the Beginning There Was Light's exploration of breatharianism will find similar themes here. This collection highlights movies about people testing the limits of human endurance and belief, presented with a balanced and thoughtful perspective.

  • contemplative
  • investigative
  • extreme
  • faith
  • endurance
  • balanced
  • Tone: contemplative, balanced, observational
  • Pacing: steady
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narratives focus on a central, often controversial, human practice. They follow subjects who are deeply committed to their path, document the challenges and scrutiny they face, and explore the tension between personal faith and external evidence. The journey is more central than a simple success/failure outcome.

Why they belong together: These movies are united by their focus on extreme human experiences at the intersection of spirituality, science, and physical endurance. They share a medium emotional weight and a contemplative mood, inviting viewers to reflect on the nature of belief and the capabilities of the human body and mind.

Every angle

In the Beginning There Was Light (2010) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about In the Beginning There Was Light in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app