Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

DAU. Degeneration (2020) movie poster

Plot Summary

DAU. Degeneration (2020) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2020 · 369 mins · Russian
Loading streaming availability…
Directed by
Ilya Khrzhanovsky, Ilya Permyakov
Starring
Marina Abramović, Romeo Castellucci, Alina Alekseeva, Zoya Popova, Nikolay Voronov, Victoria Skitskaya

A clandestine Soviet Institute engages in disturbing scientific and occult experiments, attempting to create the ideal human being through trials on animals and people. Amidst the unethical research, a corrupt KGB general and his staff ignore the director's scandalous affairs and the scientists’ debauched behavior. The situation escalates when an extremist right-wing group infiltrates the laboratory disguised as test subjects. Their mission: to purge the institute's decaying elements and potentially dismantle the world of secretive Soviet science.

On this page (5)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Every angle
Loading streaming availability…

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in DAU. Degeneration: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of DAU. Degeneration (2020) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

Set between 1966 and 1968, the film follows the twilight years of a secret Soviet scientific institute where boundary-pushing experiments in science and mysticism unravel into chaos. After the incapacitation of Lev Landau, the institute's previously renowned chief scientist, the stern and authoritarian KGB general, Vladimir Azhippo, takes control as director. Under his rule, he clamps down on the institute's permissive culture, halting the debauched behavior that marked the old regime and curbing the abuses that had gone unchecked. Yet the institute remains a place of strange and unsettling activity, where experiments on animals, humans, and even infants pursue the limits of knowledge and creation, often at the edge of what is scientifically acceptable and ethically defensible. The corridors hum with quiet tension as the line between rigorous inquiry and dangerous experimentation blurs.

Amid the decaying walls, younger staff members push back by embracing Western influences such as rock and roll, new ideas, and a different spirit, their dissent signaling a shift in the institute's social fabric. But the crackdown comes quickly, and conformity is enforced with harsh penalties, surveillance, and coercive discipline. The internal power dynamics intensify as the institute's leadership tries to reconcile competing ambitions with the new order, while the scientists themselves are forced to navigate competing loyalties—allegiance to the work, to each other, and to a political system that demands unwavering obedience.

Azhippo's measures culminate in the arrival of a violent ultra-left-wing faction, backed by the KGB to restore discipline and erase perceived degeneracy. What begins as intimidation escalates into a full-scale purge, as neo-communist thugs move through the institute with swift, brutal force, unleashing racist, antisemitic, and homophobic ideologies to justify their actions. The violence leaves scars on the staff and the institution alike, shredding procedural norms and transforming once-promising research into a ruined legacy.

Within this maelstrom, internal subplots reveal the human cost of power struggles and ideological extremism. The internal departments—Head of the Experimental Department, Alexey Blinov and Head of the Theoretical Department, Dmitry Kaledin—are shown contending with pressure from above, clashing over methods, ethics, and the future direction of the institute. On the fringes, other figures such as the Head of the Experimental Group, Maxim Martsinkevich contend with the consequences of the purge and the slow unraveling of a research community that once thrived on fearless exploration. The result is a stark meditation on ambition, control, and the high cost of political intrusion into the world of scientific inquiry.

Last updated: February 25, 2026 at 08:22

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

DAU. Degeneration Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about DAU. Degeneration (2020): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why did Vladimir Azhippo take control of the institute after Lev Landau was incapacitated?

After Lev Landau, the institute's renowned chief scientist, was incapacitated in 1966, a leadership vacuum was created. The KGB general Vladimir Azhippo seized this opportunity to take control as director, imposing a rigid command structure and replacing the previously lax, permissive atmosphere with strict authoritarian discipline.

  • vladimir azhippo
  • lev landau
  • institute leadership
  • kgb general
Q2

What kind of experiments were performed at the secret Soviet institute?

The institute conducted boundary-pushing experiments that blurred the line between science and mysticism, including tests on animals, humans, and even infants. These experiments pursued the limits of knowledge and creation, often at the edge of what was scientifically acceptable and ethically defensible.

Foreshadowing: The film's opening establishes the institute as a place where dangerous experiments were already underway before Azhippo's arrival.

  • experiments
  • science
  • mysticism
  • human experiments
  • infants
Q3

Why did the KGB send a violent ultra-left-wing group to the institute?

The KGB sponsored a violent ultra-left-wing faction to restore discipline and erase what they perceived as degeneracy at the institute. This was intended to purge the corrupting influences that had developed under the previous permissive regime and impose ideological conformity.

Foreshadowing: Azhippo's crackdown on the permissive culture set the stage for external intervention.

  • kgb
  • ultra-left
  • purge
  • degeneracy
  • ideology
Q4

What triggered the violent purge at the institute?

The purge began as intimidation by the ultra-left group and quickly escalated into full-scale violence. The neo-communist thugs unleashed racist, antisemitic, and homophobic ideologies to justify their actions, targeting staff members and shredding procedural norms until the institute's legacy was destroyed.

  • purge
  • violence
  • neo-communist
  • antisemitic
  • racist
Q5

Why were the younger staff members specifically targeted during the purge?

The younger staff members had previously rebelled by embracing Western influences like rock and roll, representing a cultural and ideological threat to the regime. Their dissent signaled a shift in the institute's social fabric, making them primary targets for the ideological purge.

Foreshadowing: The young staff's embrace of Western culture in 1967 directly preceded their targeting.

  • young staff
  • western culture
  • rock and roll
  • rebellion
  • purge
Q6

How did the institute's culture change under Vladimir Azhippo's leadership?

Under Azhippo's rule, the previously permissive culture was replaced with strict authoritarian control. Debauched behavior and unchecked abuses were halted, but discipline was enforced through harsh penalties, surveillance, and coercive methods. The freedom that had characterized the old regime was eliminated.

  • azhippo
  • culture
  • authoritarian
  • discipline
  • surveillance
Q7

What happened to the scientists working at the institute?

The purge culminated in the extermination of staff members and the destruction of the institute's legacy. Key figures like Alexey Blinov (Head of Experimental Department) and Dmitry Kaledin (Head of Theoretical Department) were forced to navigate loyalty conflicts before the violence left the staff and institution scarred.

  • scientists
  • staff extermination
  • alexey blinov
  • dmitry kaledin
  • death
Q8

Why did the young researchers embrace Western culture as rebellion?

In 1967, younger staff members pushed back against the tightening regime by embracing Western influences such as rock and roll, new ideas, and a different spirit. This represented their dissent against the rigid conformity being enforced and signaled a shift in the institute's social fabric.

  • western culture
  • rock and roll
  • rebellion
  • young staff
  • dissent
Q9

What caused the downfall of the Soviet scientific institute?

The institute's downfall resulted from the combination of Azhippo's authoritarian crackdown, the subsequent rebellion of young staff embracing Western culture, and the violent intervention by the KGB-sponsored ultra-left group. This purge destroyed the research community, leaving the once-promising complex abandoned and ruined.

  • downfall
  • collapse
  • institute
  • destruction
  • ruin
Q10

Why were the unethical experiments at the institute significant to the story?

The boundary-pushing experiments in science and mysticism defined the institute's identity and attracted both scientific ambition and political scrutiny. Their continuation under strict supervision, combined with the ethical violations they represented, made the institute a target for ideological purges and contributed to its ultimate destruction.

  • unethical experiments
  • science
  • mysticism
  • significance
  • story

Movie threads

More Movies Like DAU. Degeneration, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes DAU. Degeneration tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Institutional Horror and Moral Decay like in DAU. Degeneration

Stories of oppressive systems and the brutal rot that grows within them. If you were fascinated by the oppressive atmosphere and ethical collapse of DAU. Degeneration, this thread finds other movies about similar morally corrupt institutions. These films share a focus on psychological dread, state control, and the brutal consequences of unchecked power.

  • oppressive
  • claustrophobic
  • brutal
  • decaying
  • unsettling
  • sinister
  • Tone: bleak, sinister, unsettling
  • Pacing: variable, atmospheric build to chaotic finale
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Narratives in this thread typically follow the unraveling of a controlled environment. An organization dedicated to a lofty—or sinister—ideal slowly reveals its moral bankruptcy, often through the eyes of those trapped inside. The story builds tension through psychological manipulation and escalating unethical acts, culminating in a violent or systemic purge that offers no redemption.

Why they belong together: These films are grouped by their shared atmosphere of oppressive control and thematic focus on institutional decay. They use similar narrative tools: claustrophobic settings, morally ambiguous or corrupt authority figures, and a pervasive sense of dread that questions the very foundations of the systems they depict.

Movies about Ideological Chaos like DAU. Degeneration

When extremist beliefs violently dismantle a fragile, corrupt world. For viewers captivated by the violent purge and extremist themes in DAU. Degeneration, this thread explores similar films about ideological collapse. Discover stories where radical groups infiltrate and dismantle corrupt systems, leading to fast-paced, chaotic, and emotionally heavy finales.

  • anxious
  • brutal
  • chaotic
  • unsettling
  • extremist
  • purge
  • Tone: bleak, anxious, brutal
  • Pacing: slow build, explosive finale
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern involves an infiltration narrative. A group holding extremist views enters a compromised system with the goal of cleansing it. The pacing often shifts dramatically, starting with a slow-burn establishment of the setting's corruption before erupting into a fast-paced, violent confrontation that leaves the future uncertain and the cost immense.

Why they belong together: These films share a core narrative of ideological conflict leading to systemic collapse. They are united by a mix of high intensity, variable pacing that accelerates into chaos, and a profoundly bleak tone that explores the destructive power of fanaticism, whether from the state or its opposition.

Every angle

DAU. Degeneration (2020) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about DAU. Degeneration in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app