Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

The Tashkent Files (2019) movie poster

Plot Summary

The Tashkent Files (2019) Plot Summary Explained

Release, runtime and language
2019 · 134 min · Hindi
Echo score 40
Directed by
Vivek Agnihotri
Starring
Ravi Shankar Jaiswal, Pankaj Tripathy, Vinay Pathak, Naseeruddin Shah, Achint Kaur, Shweta Prasad

Following the sudden and unexpected death of India’s second Prime Minister, a journalist embarks on an investigation to determine the circumstances surrounding his demise. Driven by a desire for the truth, he uncovers a complex web of political maneuvering and hidden agendas. His inquiries expose long-buried secrets and potentially destabilizing revelations, forcing him to confront powerful forces who want the truth to remain hidden.

On this page (6)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Movies like The Tashkent Files
  6. 6 Every angle

Where to watch

Where to Watch The Tashkent Files (2019)

Where can you watch The Tashkent Files? Stream, rent or buy it in the US, including on fuboTV: current JustWatch availability with up-to-date prices.

Streaming availability powered by JustWatch

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in The Tashkent Files: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of The Tashkent Files (2019) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

Lal Bahadur Shastri, recognized as the second Prime Minister of India, was instrumental in guiding the nation through a pivotal triumph against Pakistan in 1965. Following this victorious period, he traveled to Tashkent, Uzbekistan, to formalize the Tashkent Agreement, a significant treaty signed on January 10, 1966, after an intense six-day negotiation. Tragically, Shastri passed away merely hours after signing this crucial document, leaving behind a shroud of mystery surrounding his untimely demise.

Fast forward to 1992, where the narrative takes a thrilling turn as a Russian spy affiliated with the KGB approaches the British Embassy in Latvia. He presents a briefcase packed with explosive documents revealing how the USSR systematically eliminated key state leaders globally. Enter Raagini Phule, played by Shweta Prasad, an ambitious investigative journalist under immense pressure to create a compelling "scoop" for her publication. She receives an anonymous call that leads her to a trove of documents related to Shastri's life and the circumstances leading to his death. Armed with this shocking information, Raagini proposes to her supervisor the idea of investigating the whereabouts of Shastri's postmortem report, which has mysteriously gone missing for over fifty years. The story gains traction, and soon, the media frenzy sweeps the nation.

At the political helm is P. K. R. Natarajan, portrayed by Naseeruddin Shah, serving as India's home minister. On the opposing side, Shyam Sunder Tripathi, played by Mithun Chakraborty, leads the Janshakti party. In a strategic meeting, Natarajan recalls the political maneuvers that positioned Shastri as Prime Minister, indicating that after the demise of Jawaharlal Nehru, it was Kamaraj who played a significant role in elevating him to power, only to later pave the way for Indira Gandhi to ascend as PM post Shastri's death.

Both Natarajan and Tripathi conspire to set up a committee to thoroughly investigate Shastri's mysterious passing, with four nominees from each side. Raagini is invited to join this high-stakes committee alongside notable figures like Justice Kurian Abraham (Vishwa Mohan Badola), youth leader Vivendra Pratap Singh Rana (Prashantt Guptha), IAS officer G. K. S. Anantha Suresh (Prakash Belawadi), NGO activist Indira Joseph Roy (Mandira Bedi), historian Aiysha Ali Shah (Pallavi Joshi), and archival director Omkar Kashyap (Rajesh Sharma).

Shastri’s declining health is also a subject of deep concern, especially considering he had suffered two heart attacks before his trip to Tashkent. The abrupt change of his accommodation from a well-equipped hotel to a mere bungalow raises serious questions. While the hotel was equipped with an operating theater and oxygen, the bungalow fell short, lacking even basic medical provisions. Eight doctors tended to him, yet only six were willing to sign off on his medical report, casting further doubt on the circumstances surrounding his health at that critical moment. A deeply unsettling reality emerges: Shastri was only provided with an intramuscular injection when an intravenous option might have saved his life.

Raagini’s investigation takes a dramatic turn when she encounters a mysterious benefactor who supplies her with a Soviet version of Shastri's medical report, which starkly contradicts the Indian government's official stance. This alternative account raises grave suspicions about the true cause of Shastri's demise. Omkar, a member of the committee, references a book by a former CIA operative indicating that both Shastri and Homi Bhabha, who were poised to advance India's nuclear capabilities, were systematically eliminated by CIA machinations.

There’s an added emotional layer as Imran Qureshi (Ankur Rathee), Natarajan's security chief and Raagini's ex-boyfriend, attempts to intimidate her into abandoning the investigation. As investigations unfold, it becomes chillingly apparent that two witnesses to Shastri's death—a doctor and his assistant—mysteriously died mere days after Shastri, under suspicious circumstances, leaving a trail of unanswered questions.

Amidst mounting evidence, the committee begins to contemplate a more sinister conspiracy—suggesting that Shastri’s legacy was deliberately erased because he was a transformative leader, and the Congress party sought to suppress a non-Nehru figure from overshadowing the nation's history. The Green and White Revolutions, alongside significant advancements in India's atomic program, bore the hallmark of Shastri’s vision; yet, these contributions have largely faded from public consciousness.

Raagini further delves into the details surrounding Shastri's body, which turned black upon returning to India, signaling possible poisoning. The narrative takes a shocking turn when it is claimed that the cook who prepared Shastri's final meal was a Muslim, implying a potentially sectarian motive behind the attack—this revelation deeply enrages Ayisha.

A pivotal encounter occurs when Raagini meets her benefactor, Bakshi, a former editor who reveals that the Congress party was complicit with the KGB in orchestrating Shastri’s removal. It is further disclosed that concrete evidence exists within the Tashkent files, which subsequently puts Raagini in grave danger as Bakshi dies in an accident shortly after their encounter.

In a bid to stifle Raagini's efforts, Natarajan and Tripathi exploit their authority to expel her from the investigative committee, hiding behind the veil of the Official Secrets Act. However, Raagini is relentless, and with sheer determination, she persuades Tripathi to allow her a final opportunity to present her findings.

With compelling evidence, she illustrates that Shastri was indeed poisoned, evidenced by his cap—a personal belonging that bore stains of blood from injuries sustained posthumously. This raised alarming questions about the integrity of the medical reports submitted. Furthermore, it is suggested that an intricate conspiracy ensued thereafter, leading to India's alignment under Soviet influence, culminating in the embedding of "Socialism" within the Indian constitution during a politically turbulent era.

In a scintillating climax, Raagini unveils the Tashkent files, once deemed inaccessible, which unravel the complex ties between Indira Gandhi and the KGB, signifying that the political fate of India was manipulated from the shadows. The narrative starkly insinuates that Indira Gandhi was indeed on the payroll of the KGB, implicating her in a larger scheme to secure her power while jeopardizing the sovereignty of the nation. Through this intricate tale of political intrigue, the film delves into the profound conspiracy that overshadowed one of India's most pivotal figures.

Last updated: November 25, 2024 at 19:24

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

The Tashkent Files Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about The Tashkent Files (2019): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why was Shastri moved from the hotel to a bungalow in Tashkent?

Shastri was abruptly moved from a well-equipped hotel to a mere bungalow shortly before his death. The hotel had an operating theater and oxygen facilities, while the bungalow lacked even basic medical provisions. This sudden accommodation change has raised serious questions about whether his care was deliberately compromised.

Foreshadowing: Earlier concerns about Shastri's security arrangements had been raised by his aides.

  • shastri
  • tashkent
  • bungalow
  • hotel
  • medical facilities
  • conspiracy
Q2

Why did only 6 of the 8 doctors sign Shastri's medical report?

Eight doctors attended to Shastri in Tashkent, but only six were willing to sign off on the medical report. This refusal by two doctors to endorse the official findings has been cited as evidence of discrepancies in the official narrative surrounding his death.

Foreshadowing: The committee members noted early on that inconsistencies existed in the documentation.

  • shastri
  • doctors
  • medical report
  • signature
  • tashkent
  • investigation
Q3

Why was Shastri given an intramuscular injection instead of intravenous treatment?

Medical experts have questioned why Shastri received only an intramuscular injection when an intravenous option was available and potentially life-saving. This decision is particularly troubling given his history of two prior heart attacks and the lack of proper medical facilities at the bungalow.

Foreshadowing: The committee noted Shastri's pre-existing heart condition during their investigation.

  • shastri
  • injection
  • medical treatment
  • heart attack
  • tashkent
Q4

What happened to the doctor and assistant who witnessed Shastri's death?

Two key witnesses to Shastri's death, his personal doctor and an assistant, died under mysterious circumstances just days after Shastri himself passed away. Their deaths eliminated crucial firsthand testimony and significantly hampered any subsequent investigation into the true cause of death.

Foreshadowing: The film establishes early that powerful forces wanted the truth to remain hidden.

  • shastri
  • doctor
  • assistant
  • witnesses
  • death
  • cover-up
Q5

What evidence suggests Shastri was poisoned rather than dying from natural causes?

Raagini uncovers several pieces of evidence pointing to poisoning: Shastri's body turned black upon returning to India, blood oozed from his injuries posthumously, and his personal cap bore blood stains from injuries sustained after death. Additionally, the Soviet medical report contradicted the official Indian version that stated heart failure as the cause.

Foreshadowing: The conflicting medical reports were introduced early in the investigation.

  • shastri
  • poisoning
  • black body
  • blood
  • medical report
  • soviet
Q6

What are the Tashkent Files and why are they important?

The Tashkent Files are classified documents that were once deemed inaccessible to the public. These files detail the complex operations between the KGB and Indian political leaders, specifically implicating Indira Gandhi in a conspiracy with Soviet intelligence. The revelation of these files exposes the political manipulation that shaped India's trajectory after Shastri's death.

Foreshadowing: The entire committee investigation builds toward uncovering these documents.

  • tashkent files
  • classified documents
  • kgb
  • indira gandhi
  • conspiracy
Q7

Why was Shastri's postmortem report missing for over fifty years?

Shastri's postmortem report mysteriously vanished for more than fifty years, despite being a critical piece of evidence in determining the true cause of his death. The film's narrative suggests this disappearance was part of a systematic cover-up orchestrated by powerful political forces who wanted to suppress the truth about his demise.

Foreshadowing: Raagini's investigation specifically targets this missing documentation.

  • shastri
  • postmortem
  • missing report
  • cover-up
  • investigation
Q8

What is the alleged connection between Indira Gandhi and the KGB?

The film claims that Indira Gandhi was on the KGB's payroll, suggesting she was complicit in a larger scheme to secure her power. According to the narrative, this connection explains how Shastri was eliminated to pave the way for her ascendancy, and how India subsequently aligned under Soviet influence, even embedding 'Socialism' in the constitution.

Foreshadowing: Bakshi's revelation provides the crucial link between Congress and Soviet intelligence.

  • indira gandhi
  • kgb
  • soviet
  • congress
  • socialism
  • conspiracy
Q9

Why was Shastri's legacy deliberately erased from Indian history?

The investigation reveals that Shastri's contributions, including the Green Revolution, White Revolution, and advancements in India's atomic program, were largely erased from public consciousness. The committee concludes that the Congress party suppressed a non-Nehru figure who had become a transformative leader, preferring to elevate Indira Gandhi instead.

Foreshadowing: The committee members discuss how Shastri's policies shaped modern India.

  • shastri
  • legacy
  • green revolution
  • white revolution
  • congress
  • erasure
Q10

How did Shastri become Prime Minister after Nehru's death?

After Jawaharlal Nehru's death, the Congress party leader Kamaraj played a significant role in elevating Lal Bahadur Shastri to the position of Prime Minister. However, the film suggests this was part of a political maneuver, Kamaraj later paved the way for Indira Gandhi to ascend as PM following Shastri's death.

Foreshadowing: Natarajan recalls these political maneuvers during committee discussions.

  • shastri
  • prime minister
  • kamaraj
  • nehru
  • indira gandhi
  • congress
Q11

What role did the CIA allegedly play in Shastri's death?

According to the film, a book by a former CIA operative suggests that both Shastri and Homi Bhabha, who were poised to advance India's nuclear capabilities, were systematically eliminated by CIA machinations. This ties into the broader geopolitical tension of the Cold War era.

Foreshadowing: The committee discusses international powers' interest in India's leadership.

  • cia
  • shastri
  • homi bhabha
  • nuclear
  • cold war
  • assassination
Q12

Why was Raagini Phule expelled from the investigation committee?

Home Minister Natarajan and opposition leader Tripathi used their political power to expel Raagini from the committee, hiding behind the Official Secrets Act. This was an attempt to suppress her findings and stop the investigation from reaching its conclusions.

Foreshadowing: Earlier scenes show both politicians conspiring to control the investigation's outcome.

  • raagini phule
  • committee
  • expelled
  • official secrets act
  • natarajan
  • tripathi

Movie threads

More Movies Like The Tashkent Files, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes The Tashkent Files tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Political Thrillers with Ambiguous Endings like The Tashkent Files

Investigation stories where revealing the truth leaves more unsettling questions than answers. For viewers who enjoyed the investigative tension and unsettling revelations of The Tashkent Files, this section features movies like it: complex political thrillers where the search for truth pits a determined individual against a systemic conspiracy, often ending with more questions than answers. These films deliver a heavy, thought-provoking experience centered on historical cover-ups and government corruption.

  • investigative
  • unsettling
  • thought-provoking
  • tense
  • clandestine
  • paranoid
  • Tone: tense, unsettling, paranoid
  • Pacing: steady, investigative
Why these movies?

The story pattern: Stories in this thread typically follow a journalist, researcher, or investigator who doggedly pursues a historical mystery or political crime. They methodically gather evidence and confront witnesses, facing intimidation and danger from powerful institutions. The narrative arc is less about a tidy resolution and more about exposing the depth of the corruption, often concluding with the truth being revealed but systemic injustice remaining largely intact.

Why they belong together: These films are grouped together because they share a specific combination of a tense, investigative tone, a complex plot involving real-world political machinations, a steady, methodical pacing, and a profoundly ambiguous ending that reinforces the theme of enduring, unaccountable power. The emotional journey is heavy and thought-provoking, not cathartic.

Suspenseful Movies about Historical Cover-ups like The Tashkent Files

Where one person's quest for a buried truth unveils a dangerous web of lies. If you liked the clandestine suspense and historical mystery of The Tashkent Files, you'll find similar movies here. This collection features tense, paranoid thrillers about uncovering cold war secrets, assassination plots, and government cover-ups, where the investigator's pursuit of the truth becomes a perilous journey against unseen adversaries.

  • paranoid
  • suspenseful
  • clandestine
  • investigative
  • unsettling
  • tense
  • Tone: tense, paranoid, suspenseful
  • Pacing: steady, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern involves an outsider—a journalist, an academic, or a relative of a victim—becoming obsessed with a historical event whose official story doesn't add up. Their investigation is a slow unraveling of a tightly woven conspiracy, encountering reluctant witnesses, fabricated evidence, and direct threats. The story structure builds a pervasive sense of being watched and manipulated, creating a deeply paranoid viewing experience.

Why they belong together: These movies are united by their specific vibe: a tense, suspenseful, and paranoid mood generated by a high-stakes investigation into a historical cover-up. They share a steady pacing that allows dread to build, high intensity from the life-or-death implications of the inquiry, and a focus on the psychological toll of uncovering secrets that powerful people want hidden.

If you liked this

Movies Like The Tashkent Files

Similar movies to The Tashkent Files: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

The Tashkent Files (2019) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about The Tashkent Files in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app