My Kid Could Paint That

The documentary begins by introducing Marla Olmstead, a talented young girl from Binghamton, NY. Her remarkable skills in abstract painting draw attention as she is recognized as a child prodigy.

Marla’s father, Mark Olmstead, shares his experiences as an amateur painter and recalls how Marla developed an interest in painting. Inspired by watching him at the easel, Marla asks to paint on her own, leading to her first creations.

A friend of Marla’s family suggests showcasing her artwork in his coffee shop. This initial display results in unexpected offers for her paintings, marking the beginning of her rise to fame as an artist.

Local journalist Elizabeth Cohen writes an article about Marla after discussing it with her parents. This article eventually attracts significant media attention, leading to increased interest in Marla's artwork.

Marla's story gains traction when her article is featured in the New York Times. This exposure propels her into the limelight, showcasing her work and beginning a whirlwind of television appearances.

Marla's fame continues to grow, and she is invited to hold gallery exhibitions in various locations, including New York and Los Angeles. Sales for her artwork reach staggering amounts, surpassing $300,000.

In February 2005, Marla's parents watch a CBS News segment from 60 Minutes II that raises questions about the authenticity of her artwork. The segment includes insights from child psychologist Ellen Winner, who examines Marla's apparent lack of prodigious talent.

Ellen Winner initially praises Marla's art, calling it beautiful and a potential fit for prestigious museums. However, as she observes Marla painting, her perspective shifts to viewing Marla as a typical child engaged in painting.

The dialogue between Winner and the CBS segment raises suspicions about the authenticity of Marla's earlier works. Viewer speculation intensifies as they wonder whether she worked independently or had outside influences.

As the debate over Marla's talent continues, the film explores the impact of media fame on her as a child artist. It discusses the complexities of identity, talent, and the public’s perception of artistic merit.

The documentary culminates in a discussion about the nature of art itself. It questions what constitutes true artistry and the role that external perception plays in defining one’s creative abilities.

Ultimately, the film leaves viewers contemplating Marla Olmstead's artistic journey and the controversies that accompany it. It invites them to draw their own conclusions on her talent and the essence of abstract expressionism.