Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

Murder on the Orient Express (2017) movie poster

Plot Summary

Murder on the Orient Express (2017) Plot Summary & Ending Explained

Release, runtime and language
2017 · 114 min · English
Echo score 65
JustWatch #3,176 7
Directed by
Kenneth Branagh
Starring
Willem Dafoe, Daisy Ridley, Marwan Kenzari, Johnny Depp, Michelle Pfeiffer, Olivia Colman
Budget
$55M

A lavish journey aboard the Orient Express takes a dark turn when a murder occurs, trapping thirteen strangers in a confined space. Renowned detective Hercule Poirot must navigate a complex web of secrets and conflicting alibis to identify the killer among them. As suspicion falls on everyone, Poirot races against time to uncover the motive and method behind the crime, based on Agatha Christie's celebrated novel.

On this page (8)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 What happens: full plot
  3. 3 Plot questions answered
  4. 4 How it ends
  5. 5 The book behind the movie
  6. 6 Movie threads
  7. 7 Movies like Murder on the Orient Express
  8. 8 Every angle

Where to watch

Where to Watch Murder on the Orient Express (2017)

Where can you watch Murder on the Orient Express? Stream, rent or buy it in the US, including on HBO Max, Amazon Video and Apple TV Store: current JustWatch availability with up-to-date prices.

Streaming availability powered by JustWatch

Full plot summary · contains spoilers

What Happens in Murder on the Orient Express: Full Plot Summary

The whole story of Murder on the Orient Express (2017) explained, from the opening scene to the final frame: every key event, every twist and what it all adds up to. Read it as a quick recap before the sequel, to check a scene you missed, or to finally understand what really happened.

In 1934, the renowned detective Hercule Poirot (Kenneth Branagh) finds himself entangled in a perplexing theft case at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. A man marked by his obsessive-compulsive tendencies, Poirot strives for balance in his life and views his extraordinary skill to uncover lies amid truths as somewhat of a curse. While yearning for some peace in Istanbul, he is compelled to return to London to tackle yet another mystery. His close friend, Bouc (Tom Bateman), who manages the Orient Express, extends an invitation for him to stay aboard the illustrious train.

Amidst this setting, businessman Samuel Ratchett (Johnny Depp) solicits Poirot's services as a bodyguard during their three-day voyage, fearing threats he has received from an anonymous source. Poirot, however, declines this job. That very night, he becomes alert to peculiar sounds emanating from Ratchett's cabin and witnesses a mysterious figure clad in a red kimono dashing down the corridor. Suddenly, tragedy strikes when an avalanche derails the train, trapping the passengers in its grip.

The following morning unveils the shocking news that Ratchett has been brutally murdered, stabbed multiple times during the night. Teaming up with Bouc, Poirot begins to unearth the identities and alibis of the passengers as repairs to the train get underway. Evidence points towards a single perpetrator responsible for Ratchett's demise, with Caroline Hubbard (Michelle Pfeiffer) asserting that someone had entered her compartment, providing a potential route for the murderer into Ratchett's space.

Poirot's investigation reveals a partially ruined note linking Ratchett to the infamous kidnapping of Daisy Armstrong, a little girl who was taken from her home for ransom and later discovered dead despite the payment being made. Ratchett is exposed as John Cassetti, the very man responsible for Daisy's abduction and murder. The heartbreaking repercussions of Daisy's death led to her mother's tragic demise during childbirth and her father's subsequent suicide. The case deepens further with the shocking revelation of the nursemaid Susanne, who was wrongfully accused and later took her own life after being unjustly incarcerated.

The train compartments were securely locked that night, leaving only the individuals within that compartment as potential suspects. Even a guard confirmed he saw no one enter Ratchett’s cabin during the crucial time. An analysis of Ratchett’s coffee indicates it was drugged, yet his valet Henry remains in the dark about how it occurred before or after it was served to Ratchett. As new evidence surfaces, including a bloodied handkerchief and a button from a conductor's uniform found in Hubbard's room, the mystery intensifies further. Hubbard gets attacked but survives, leaving Poirot grasping at the threads of a complex narrative.

Not long after, Poirot engages in interviews with various suspects, including Mary Debenham (Daisy Ridley), where tension escalates when John Arbuthnot nearly shoots Poirot, only to clarify his intent was not to kill but to assert a point. With each interaction, hidden connections to the Armstrong family emerge, weaving a dense tapestry that Poirot meticulously unravels.

Eventually, he confronts the passengers with two potential theories regarding Ratchett’s death. The simpler one suggests that an outsider masquerading as the conductor carried out the murder, while the more intricate theory indicates that all present had a personal connection to the Armstrong tragedy, yielding a collective motive against Cassetti. In a stunning turn, it becomes evident that Hubbard is actually Linda Arden, a former celebrated actress and mother to Sonia Armstrong, who orchestrated the murder plot alongside the other suspects.

Poirot further uncovers deep links among the passengers to the Armstrong family. Hector Willard MacQueen (Josh Gad), Ratchett’s loyal secretary, bears connections through his father to the kidnapping case, fueling his rage against Cassetti. The plot thickens with revelations about Edward Henry Masterman, Colonel Armstrong’s batman and later servant, and Colonel Arbuthnot, a trusted friend of Armstrong. They all share intertwined histories of grief and vengeance stemming from the past.

Ultimately, as Poirot pieces together this complex puzzle, he challenges the suspects, proposing that all of them took part in Ratchett’s death, each delivering a blow to reserve their collective secret. Tragically, at the conclusion of this moral dilemma, Poirot realizes that true justice will elude him. Cassetti's crimes justified his death, leaving Poirot to bear the weight of a lie on his mind. He presents a solitary killer theory to the authorities, facilitating the passengers’ escape. As the train gets back on its course, a messenger approaches Poirot, requesting his expertise on a death that has occurred on the Nile, prompting Poirot to take on yet another complex investigation.

Last updated: November 02, 2024 at 12:33

Was this helpful?

Plot questions answered

Murder on the Orient Express Plot Explained: Your Questions Answered

The questions people ask most about Murder on the Orient Express (2017): what happens in the confusing scenes, why the characters do what they do, the twists, hidden details and what the ending means. Each answer contains spoilers.

Q1

Why does Poirot decline Ratchett's request for protection?

Poirot initially declines Ratchett's offer because he senses something false about the man. Despite Ratchett claiming to fear for his life from anonymous threats, Poirot's keen ability to detect lies tells him Ratchett is not being truthful. This instinct proves justified when it's revealed Ratchett is actually John Cassetti, the man responsible for Daisy Armstrong's kidnapping and murder.

Foreshadowing: Poirot's opening scene establishes his belief that his ability to detect lies is a curse, hinting at his later reluctance to take the case.

  • poirot
  • ratchett
  • bodyguard
  • declined job
  • orient express
Q2

Who is Samuel Ratchett actually?

Samuel Ratchett is revealed to be John Cassetti, the infamous criminal responsible for the kidnapping and murder of young Daisy Armstrong. Cassetti orchestrated the abduction for ransom but killed the child anyway, despite the family paying the ransom. This discovery motivates the passengers to kill him as revenge for the Armstrong family's suffering.

Foreshadowing: Ratchett's nervous behavior and the anonymous threats he mentions hint at his criminal past.

  • ratchett
  • john cassetti
  • daisy armstrong
  • kidnapping
  • criminal identity
Q3

What is the Daisy Armstrong case about?

Daisy Armstrong was a young girl kidnapped from her home and held for ransom. Despite the family paying the ransom, Daisy was murdered by John Cassetti. Her death caused devastating ripple effects: her mother Sonia died during childbirth (which was triggered by grief), her father Colonel Armstrong committed suicide, and the nursemaid Susanne was wrongfully accused of involvement and later killed herself in prison. This tragedy connects all the passengers on the train.

Foreshadowing: The ruined note found linking Ratchett to the Armstrong case is the key clue that unravels the mystery.

  • daisy armstrong
  • kidnapping
  • sonia armstrong
  • colonel armstrong
  • nursemaid susanne
Q4

Why are all the passengers on the train suspects?

All passengers become suspects because the train was derailed by an avalanche, trapping everyone inside. With no external escape route and compartments locked from the inside, only the passengers themselves could have committed the murder. Poirot's investigation then reveals each passenger has a hidden connection to the Armstrong family, giving them collective motive.

Foreshadowing: The avalanche creates a perfect locked-room scenario, forcing Poirot to consider all passengers as potential killers.

  • passengers
  • suspects
  • locked train
  • armstrong family connections
Q5

Who is Caroline Hubbard really?

Caroline Hubbard is actually Linda Arden, a retired celebrated actress and mother to Sonia Armstrong (Daisy Armstrong's mother). She orchestrated the entire murder plot, gathering all the passengers who had connections to the Armstrong family to carry out the coordinated killing of John Cassetti as revenge for destroying their family.

Foreshadowing: Hubbard's claim that someone entered her compartment during the night serves as a red herring and part of the elaborate plan.

  • caroline hubbard
  • linda arden
  • sonia armstrong
  • actress
  • mastermind
Q6

How was Ratchett murdered with locked compartments?

The murder was possible because all the passengers participated in the killing. Each person stabbed Cassetti once in a coordinated plan, meaning no single person acted alone. The compartments were locked from the inside, and the conductor confirmed seeing no one enter, which aligns with the passengers' collective alibi since they were all inside the train the entire time.

Foreshadowing: The bloodied conductor's button found in Hubbard's room was planted as false evidence.

  • locked compartment
  • murder method
  • coordinated killing
  • knife
Q7

Why does Poirot present a false theory to the police?

Poirot presents the theory of a single external killer because he faces a moral dilemma. While he has solved the case and knows all passengers participated in the murder, he recognizes their actions were justified revenge against Cassetti for the destruction of the Armstrong family. Poirot believes true justice cannot be served, so he lies to allow the passengers to escape legal consequences.

Foreshadowing: Poirot's opening philosophical struggle between order and chaos foreshadows his decision to bend the truth.

  • poirot lie
  • moral dilemma
  • justice
  • police
  • theory presented
Q8

Why does Poirot let the killers go free?

Poirot allows the killers to escape because he views Cassetti's crimes as deserving death, even if illegally carried out. He cannot bring himself to condemn grieving family members and friends who sought vengeance for the innocent Daisy's murder and its devastating aftermath. By presenting a single killer theory to the authorities, he enables their escape while bearing the weight of the lie himself.

Foreshadowing: The bitter ending reflects Poirot's ongoing battle between his moral code and his sense of mercy.

  • poirot mercy
  • vigilantes
  • escape
  • vengeance
  • moral choice
Q9

What was the mysterious figure in the red kimono?

The figure in the red kimono that Poirot saw rushing through the corridor was part of the murder plot's misdirection. The identity is never fully confirmed, but it was likely Linda Arden (as Caroline Hubbard) or another passenger dressed to create confusion and provide an alibi. This mysterious figure contributed to the initial chaos and helped obscure the truth of what happened that night.

Foreshadowing: The red kimono sighting occurs before the murder is discovered, establishing early suspicion.

  • red kimono
  • mysterious figure
  • corridor
  • disguise
  • misdirection
Q10

How does Poirot discover Ratchett's true identity?

Poirot discovers Ratchett's identity as John Cassetti through a partially ruined note found during the investigation. The note connects Ratchett to the Armstrong kidnapping case. Combined with the passengers' reactions and hidden connections to the Armstrong family, Poirot pieces together that Ratchett is the criminal who kidnapped and murdered Daisy Armstrong.

Foreshadowing: The note's discovery comes after Poirot uncovers the Armstrong backstory.

  • note
  • evidence
  • cassetti identity
  • discovery
  • armstrong case
Q11

Why was Ratchett afraid and asking for protection?

Ratchett claimed to fear for his life from anonymous threats, but in reality, he was paranoia-stricken about being caught for his past crimes. As John Cassetti, he had many enemies and likely feared retaliation from those connected to his previous victims or their families. His request for Poirot as a bodyguard was an attempt to protect himself, though he failed to disclose his true identity.

Foreshadowing: Ratchett's nervous behavior throughout the journey hints at his guilty conscience.

  • ratchett fear
  • threats
  • protection
  • paranoia
  • bodyguard request
Q12

Which passengers are connected to the Armstrong family?

The passengers have various connections: Linda Arden (as Caroline Hubbard) is Sonia Armstrong's mother; Colonel Arbuthnot was a close friend of Colonel Armstrong; Edward Masterman was Armstrong's batman and later servant; Hector MacQueen's father was involved in the original case; Mary Debenham was Sonia's governess; Count Andrenyi was connected through the family; and other passengers similarly had ties to the Armstrong household. All sought revenge for Cassetti destroying their loved ones.

Foreshadowing: Each interview gradually reveals another connection to the Armstrong family.

  • passengers connections
  • armstrong family
  • colonel arbuthnot
  • mary debenham
  • edward masterman
  • hector macqueen

Ending explained

What Happens at the End of Murder on the Orient Express?

How Murder on the Orient Express (2017) ends, in short: the final scene, the last twist and what it means for the characters. The full ending explained, with every spoiler, lives on its own page.

Read the full ending explained

The ending of Murder on the Orient Express presents a profound twist that challenges traditional notions of justice. Hercule Poirot, having discovered that all the passengers on the train are intimately connected to the tragic kidnapping and murder of Daisy Armstrong—acts committed by the same man, Cassetti—faces a moral dilemma. Cassetti, a man responsible for a horrifying crime that devastated many lives, is already dead in the story's investigation, and Poirot uncovers the elaborate web of revenge that the passengers have enacted together. Led by Linda Arden, the group devises a plan to murder Cassetti on the train, knowing full well that all of them have a personal connection and a shared motive rooted in grief and justice. They plan a staged attack—drugging him and stabbing him with a dozen different knives—to ensure that the true killer remains anonymous, and that no single person is uniquely responsible.

When Poirot, who arrives last-minute on the train and begins his investigation, quickly spots the inconsistencies and false clues crafted by the passengers, he concludes that everyone involved took part in the killing. His initial suspicion of an external assassin is dismissed, and he recognizes that the act was a joint effort. Ultimately, despite knowing who the murderers are, Poirot chooses not to hand them over to the authorities. Instead, he crafts a clever false story claiming there was a stowaway, allowing the group to go free. His decision stems from his recognition that, while what they did was morally wrong, they were motivated by a desire to avenge the innocent Daisy Armstrong and to punish a man who had escaped justice for too long.

Continue reading the ending (2 more paragraphs)

This choice signifies a shift in Poirot’s moral outlook. Traditionally, he values justice above all else, but here he understands that sometimes the moral weight of an act surpasses legal justice. By turning a blind eye, Poirot acknowledges that the passengers' actions, though criminal, were an emotionally driven response to profound trauma and injustice. It’s a moment that reveals a more empathetic, morally complex side of the detective—one that shows he recognizes the limits of law and the importance of moral righteousness in a world filled with shades of grey.

Ultimately, Poirot’s decision encapsulates the film’s deeper message: sometimes, justice can be imperfect, and taking justice into one's own hands, driven by compassion or moral necessity, can be justified. He accepts that the passengers’ revenge was a tragic but understandable act and chooses to shield them from punishment. The ending leaves viewers contemplating the thin line between right and wrong, and whether true justice always means the letter of the law. It’s a powerful, thought-provoking conclusion that underscores the film’s exploration of morality, guilt, and the complexity of human motives.

Murder on the Orient Express ending explained in full

Movie threads

More Movies Like Murder on the Orient Express, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes Murder on the Orient Express tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Claustrophobic mystery movies like Murder on the Orient Express

Isolated settings where a closed circle of suspects must face a hunter in their midst. If you enjoyed the tense, confined setting of Murder on the Orient Express, you'll like these movies where a mystery unfolds in an isolated location. This list features stories with a closed circle of suspects, high-stakes investigations, and an atmosphere of suspicion and claustrophobia, similar to Agatha Christie's classic tales.

  • claustrophobic
  • suspenseful
  • methodical
  • anxious
  • oppressive
  • cerebral
  • Tone: tense, suspicious
  • Pacing: steady, methodical
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative typically begins with a group of people being trapped in a single location, such as a train, an island, or a mansion. A crime, often a murder, occurs, and an investigator (either professional or an amateur) must systematically interrogate the suspects. The plot unfolds through revelations of secrets and hidden connections between the characters, all under the pressure of the confined space.

Why they belong together: These movies are grouped together because they share a core premise of a 'closed-circle' mystery. The similarity lies in the oppressive, claustrophobic atmosphere, the methodical unraveling of alibis and motives, and the constant state of suspense where the killer is guaranteed to be among the limited cast of characters present.

Movies about complex morality and justice like Murder on the Orient Express

Stories where the pursuit of justice forces characters into ethically ambiguous territory. If you appreciated the moral dilemma at the end of Murder on the Orient Express, explore these films that grapple with grey-area justice. These stories feature heavy emotional weight, complex motivations, and endings that are bittersweet or morally ambiguous, focusing on the difficult choices characters make in the name of justice.

  • melancholic
  • thought-provoking
  • heavy
  • somber
  • moral conflict
  • grey morality
  • Tone: bittersweet, heavy
  • Pacing: steady, deliberate
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The journey typically involves uncovering a past tragedy so heinous that it justifies, in the eyes of some characters, an act of vigilante justice. The protagonist, often a figure of law or order, is faced with this morally fraught situation. The climax is not about catching the culprit, but about deciding what to do with them, resulting in an ending that satisfies a moral code but violates a legal one.

Why they belong together: This thread groups movies that prioritize thematic depth about justice over clear-cut resolutions. They share a heavy emotional weight rooted in grief or trauma, a complex narrative that explores motive in depth, and a conclusion that leaves the audience pondering the ethical implications rather than feeling a simple sense of closure.

If you liked this

Movies Like Murder on the Orient Express

Similar movies to Murder on the Orient Express: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

Murder on the Orient Express (2017) Explained: Plot, Ending, Timeline & Characters

Everything about Murder on the Orient Express in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning, the ending explained and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app