Plot Explained Spoilers guaranteed!
Plot Explained

Browse by genre

On the Basis of Sex (2018) movie poster

Timeline

On the Basis of Sex (2018) Timeline Explained – Every Event in Order

Release, runtime and language
2018 · 120 min · English
Echo score 64
JustWatch #9,723 4
Directed by
Mimi Leder
Starring
Jack Reynor, Justin Theroux, Armie Hammer, Felicity Jones, Sam Waterston, Chris Mulkey
Budget
$20M

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a young lawyer and mother, challenges societal norms and confronts personal and professional obstacles while fighting for gender equality. Alongside her husband, Martin, she takes on a pivotal tax case that has the potential to fundamentally alter the legal system and establish her legacy as a champion for women’s rights. The case becomes a catalyst for a broader legal battle against gender discrimination.

On this page (6)
  1. 1 Where to watch
  2. 2 Events in order (15)
  3. 3 Timeline questions answered
  4. 4 Movie threads
  5. 5 Movies like On the Basis of Sex
  6. 6 Every angle

Where to watch

Where to Watch On the Basis of Sex (2018)

Where can you watch On the Basis of Sex? Stream, rent or buy it in the US, including on Netflix, Netflix Standard and Amazon Video: current JustWatch availability with up-to-date prices.

Streaming availability powered by JustWatch

15 events in order · contains spoilers

On the Basis of Sex Timeline: Events in Chronological Order

Every key event of On the Basis of Sex (2018) in order, scene by scene, with when and where it takes place. Use it to untangle flashbacks, time jumps and parallel storylines, to refresh your memory before the sequel or to find the exact scene you are thinking of.

  1. Ruth's Journey Begins

    In 1956, Ruth Bader Ginsburg embarks on her academic journey as she starts her first year at Harvard Law School. Despite the challenges ahead, she is determined to succeed while also managing her family responsibilities, highlighting her remarkable resilience.

    When
    1956
    Where
    Harvard Law School
  2. Caring for Martin

    During her first year, Ruth also takes on the responsibility of attending her husband Martin's lectures as he battles cancer. This dual commitment showcases Ruth's dedication to her family while pursuing her education.

  3. Martin's Cancer Remission

    As the years progress, Martin’s health improves and his cancer goes into remission. This recovery allows him to accept a promising position at a prestigious law firm in New York, shifting their family dynamics and aspirations.

    Where
    New York
  4. Transferring to Columbia

    Facing obstacles at Harvard, Ruth petitions Dean Griswold to complete her law degree at Columbia Law School. After being denied, she makes the bold decision to transfer, demonstrating her determination to overcome barriers in her academic journey.

    Where
    Columbia Law School
  5. Teaching at Rutgers

    Despite her stellar academic performance, Ruth struggles to find a position at a law firm due to gender biases. Ultimately, she takes on a teaching role at Rutgers Law School, focusing her efforts on educating future lawyers about sex discrimination in the law.

    Where
    Rutgers Law School
  6. Introduction to Moritz v. Commissioner

    In 1970, Martin introduces Ruth to the pivotal case of Moritz v. Commissioner, where Charles Moritz is denied a tax deduction due to gender discrimination. This case serves as a catalyst for Ruth's career in fighting gender discrimination through the legal system.

    When
    1970
  7. Seeking ACLU's Help

    Determined to make a difference, Ruth approaches Mel Wulf from the ACLU for assistance with the Moritz case. Initially hesitant, Wulf's perspective changes thanks to the encouragement of activist Dorothy Kenyon, who recognizes the significance of Ruth’s mission.

  8. Meeting with Moritz

    Ruth travels to Denver to meet Charles Moritz, who agrees to let Ruth and the ACLU represent him pro bono. This agreement marks a significant step in their legal battle against gender discrimination, with implications that extend beyond their individual case.

    Where
    Denver
  9. Preparations for Court

    As the legal battle intensifies, James H. Bozarth leads the defense against the existing law. Meanwhile, Ruth, grappling with her courtroom inexperience, struggles with anxiety during practice, but receives crucial support from her husband Martin.

  10. Courtroom Dynamics

    During the court proceedings, Martin takes the lead while Ruth focuses on the equal protection arguments. Their collaboration exemplifies their partnership and commitment to challenging the legal norms of gender discrimination.

  11. Government's Offer

    Facing a meager settlement of one dollar from the government, Ruth counters with a proposal for recognition of Moritz's deduction claim alongside a declaration about the unconstitutionality of restrictive gender clauses. This moment emphasizes her determination to challenge unjust laws.

  12. The Appeal Process

    The case proceeds to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals after the government rejects Ruth's counter. As they await the court's decision, tensions rise as the stakes of the case become clear for both genders and future legal practices.

    Where
    Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
  13. Ruth's Rebuttal

    During oral arguments, Ruth makes a compelling rebuttal that articulates the need for laws to evolve with society. Her assertion that traditional gender roles should not dictate legal recognition highlights her forward-thinking approach.

  14. Celebration of Victory

    Following the court's unanimous ruling in favor of Moritz, Ruth, her family, and Wulf celebrate a significant victory in the fight against gender discrimination. This landmark case sets a precedent for future challenges against discriminatory laws.

  15. Ruth's Supreme Court Appointment

    In 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg is appointed as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Her journey from a law student to the highest court in the nation symbolizes her profound impact on gender equality and justice in America.

    When
    1993
    Where
    U.S. Supreme Court

Last updated: November 04, 2024 at 01:43

Was this helpful?

Timeline questions answered

On the Basis of Sex Timeline Explained: Your Questions Answered

When does it happen, and why in that order? The questions people ask about the chronology of On the Basis of Sex (2018): time jumps, flashbacks, cause and effect between scenes and the correct order of events, each answered with spoilers.

Q1

Why did Ruth Bader Ginsburg attend her husband's classes at Harvard?

Ruth attended Martin's lectures because he was in his second year of law school but had fallen ill with cancer. She took detailed notes and learned the material herself so she could help him keep up with his coursework while he underwent treatment. This also allowed her to observe the classes she wasn't yet officially permitted to take.

  • harvard law school
  • martin ginsburg
  • cancer
  • law school
Q2

Why did Ruth transfer from Harvard to Columbia Law School?

Ruth petitioned Harvard to let her complete her degree at Columbia so she could be closer to Martin, who had accepted a job in New York after his cancer went into remission. Dean Griswold refused, citing strict university policy. Ruth then applied and transferred to Columbia, where she eventually graduated at the top of her class.

Foreshadowing: Earlier, Martin's recovery allowed him to take the New York position that made proximity to Columbia necessary.

  • harvard law school
  • columbia law school
  • dean griswold
  • transfer
Q3

Why couldn't Ruth get a job at a law firm after graduating from Columbia?

Despite graduating at the top of her class at Columbia Law School, Ruth was rejected by every law firm she applied to. This was due to the pervasive gender discrimination of the era, firms simply would not hire women as attorneys. Unable to find a position in private practice, Ruth accepted a teaching position at Rutgers Law School.

  • gender discrimination
  • law firm
  • rutgers law school
  • career barriers
Q4

Why did Ruth choose a man's tax case to fight gender discrimination?

Ruth intentionally selected Charles Moritz's case because he was a man denied a tax deduction for caring for his elderly mother, a benefit the law restricted to women, widows, and widowers only. By winning a case that demonstrated gender discrimination harmed men too, she could establish a broader constitutional precedent that would benefit women in future lawsuits.

  • moritz v commissioner
  • tax deduction
  • gender discrimination precedent
  • charles moritz
Q5

What was the Moritz v. Commissioner case about?

Moritz v. Commissioner (1972) involved Charles Moritz, who hired a nurse to care for his elderly mother. He was denied a tax deduction for this expense because the law only allowed the deduction for women, widows, widowers, or men with wives. Ruth argued this gender-based restriction violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • moritz case
  • tax deduction
  • equal protection
  • tenth circuit
Q6

Why did the ACLU initially refuse to take Ruth's case?

Mel Wulf from the ACLU initially declined because he believed the organization should focus on cases affecting women directly, not a man seeking a tax benefit. Activist Dorothy Kenyon convinced him that winning for a man would set a precedent that could help women in subsequent cases, changing his mind.

  • aclu
  • mel wulf
  • dorothy kenyon
  • legal representation
Q7

Why did Martin argue the case instead of Ruth in court?

Although Ruth developed the legal strategy and arguments, Martin took the lead in courtroom presentation because Ruth had never argued a case before and was extremely nervous during practice sessions. Their collaborator James Bozarth also played a significant role in researching the constitutional arguments. Ruth delivered the rebuttal, which proved decisive.

  • martin ginsburg
  • courtroom
  • james bozarth
  • oral arguments
Q8

What did Ruth mean when she said the Constitution doesn't mention 'woman' or 'freedom'?

During oral arguments, when challenged about the Constitution's silence on women, Ruth responded that it also doesn't mention 'freedom.' She argued that the framers wrote the Constitution broadly enough to evolve with society, and that gender roles from 100 or even 20 years ago no longer applied to modern life.

  • constitution
  • oral arguments
  • equality
  • legal precedent
Q9

What happened after Ruth won the Moritz case?

After the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously in Moritz's favor, Ruth went on to co-found the ACLU's Women's Rights Project. Using the precedent she established, she successfully challenged numerous discriminatory laws across the country. The victory marked the beginning of her career as a leading constitutional lawyer fighting gender discrimination.

  • aclu women's rights project
  • tenth circuit
  • legal precedent
  • career
Q10

How did Ruth Bader Ginsburg become a Supreme Court justice?

Following her groundbreaking legal work with the ACLU, Ruth built a reputation as one of the nation's leading experts on gender discrimination law. In 1993, President Bill Clinton nominated her to the U.S. Supreme Court, where she served as an Associate Justice until her death in 2020.

  • supreme court
  • 1993
  • bill clinton
  • associate justice

Movie threads

More Movies Like On the Basis of Sex, by Mood & Story

Curated lists built around what makes On the Basis of Sex tick: the same mood, the same kind of story or the same emotional payoff. Each list explains why these movies belong together.

Inspiring legal underdog stories like On the Basis of Sex

Stories of determined individuals taking on the system for a greater cause. Find more movies like On the Basis of Sex that focus on determined individuals fighting systemic injustice through landmark court cases. These films share a steady, hopeful pace and deliver a satisfying, uplifting conclusion to their real-world legal battles.

  • inspiring
  • determined
  • tense
  • uplifting
  • resilient
  • serious
  • Tone: hopeful, determined, inspiring
  • Pacing: steady, procedural
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative typically follows a clear, straightforward arc: a protagonist identifies a legal injustice, gathers evidence and allies, and faces off against a powerful, indifferent system. The central conflict is intellectual and procedural, building tension through courtroom strategy and personal conviction rather than physical action.

Why they belong together: Movies are grouped here for their shared focus on a single, pivotal legal case as a vehicle for social change, their inspiring tone, and their celebration of resilience and intellectual triumph over prejudice.

Biographies of quiet resilience like Ruth Bader Ginsburg in On the Basis of Sex

Character-driven stories of perseverance that change the world through steady conviction. If you liked the steady, determined journey of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in On the Basis of Sex, explore these other biographical dramas. They feature real-life figures who overcome obstacles not with flashy action, but with persistent intellect and unwavering principle.

  • inspiring
  • resilient
  • serious
  • optimistic
  • determined
  • grounded
  • Tone: hopeful, serious, optimistic
  • Pacing: steady, chronological
Why these movies?

The story pattern: The narrative pattern is a linear, chronological journey through key life events, highlighting personal sacrifices, professional rejections, and small victories that accumulate toward a larger legacy. The emotional journey is one of steadfastness, where the protagonist's internal strength is their primary weapon.

Why they belong together: These films are united by their straightforward biographical structure, their medium emotional weight, and their central theme of perseverance. They share a hopeful, steady vibe that focuses on character and conviction over fast-paced plot twists.

If you liked this

Movies Like On the Basis of Sex

Similar movies to On the Basis of Sex: the same genre, themes or kind of story. Each one comes with its own plot summary, timeline and ending explained.

Browse all movie summaries

Every angle

On the Basis of Sex (2018) Explained: Plot, Timeline & Characters

Everything about On the Basis of Sex in one place: what happens in the plot summary, the timeline in chronological order, the characters and meaning and a spoiler-free summary. What's After the Movie adds the cast, box office and post-credit scenes.

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

Plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Catch up on any movie in minutes, save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private, always.

Learn more about the app